Skip to main content

Rethinking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprises: A Three-Dimensional Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Entrepreneurship

Part of the book series: International Studies in Entrepreneurship ((volume 29))

Abstract

This chapter enriches the theory of social entrepreneurship by rethinking social entrepreneurship in a three-dimensional disciplinary perspective. In order to confirm the extraordinary features of social entrepreneurship and social enterprises in creating social value and achieving social outcomes, a three-dimensional development and value view of social enterprises are proposed. Entrepreneurship is held to be a family of three dimensions, consisting of commercial entrepreneurship, humanistic entrepreneurship, and social entrepreneurship. In the chapter we argue that such an approach could bring fresh development to social entrepreneurship as well as to commercial entrepreneurship, not only for a deeper understanding of different parts of social entrepreneurship, but also as a basis for understanding that the model presented could influence the future work of institutions, the policy measures to be taken, and the fact that this model will make possible a better understanding of the phenomena. In fact, the model, which integrates commercial entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship and humanistic entrepreneurship, is a tool for describing these three different dimensions. In this chapter, the model is developed, while its policy implications will be considered later in the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashoka (1996). Rodrigo Baggio Barreto. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://ashoka.org/node/3396.

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2009). Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(10), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDI (2013). Center for Digital Inclusion. Retrieved April 8, 2013, http://www.cdi.org.br/?lang=en.

  • Chand, V. S., & Misra, S. (2009). Teachers as educational—social entrepreneurs: The innovation—social entrepreneurship spiral. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chell, E., Nicolopoulou, K., & Karatas-Ozkan, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: International and innovation perspectives. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(6), 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner, P. D., & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship, draft 31 October 1998, revised 30 May 2001. Retrieved May 29, 2013, from http://www.caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf.

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2010). The politics of narrating social entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 4(1), 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: a conceptual and policy primer. Harvard: HUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, T. (2010), ‘What are the characteristics of an entrepreneur? Retrieved July 1, from http://tgopinathan.suite101.com/what-are-the-characteristics-of-an-entrepreneur-a256810.

  • Haugh, H. (2007). New strategies for a sustainable society: The growing contribution of social entrepreneurship’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 743–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, O., Brown, B., & Gordon, T. (1966). Social technology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K. (2008). Managerial perceptions of the business case for corporate social responsibility (CBSCSR Working Paper Series; Copenhagen Business School).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K., & Wustenhagen, R. (2010). Greening goliaths versus emerging Davids—theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K., Mair, J., & Robinson, J. (2010). Values and opportunities in social entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IBJ (2012). International Bridges to Justice. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.ibj.org/Mission.html.

  • Kabir, S. M. H. (2007). Strategic planning in municipal government: The case of City of Ottawa. Canadian Social Science, 3(5), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiva (2005–2013). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.kiva.org/about.

  • Kneiding, C., & Tracey, P. (2009). Towards a performance measurement framework for community development finance institutions in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, O. M. & Kansikas, J. (2011). Social entrepreneurship research across disciplines: paradigmatic and methodological considerations, paper given at the 3rd EMES International Research Conference, Roskilde University, 4–7 July. Retrieved May 29, 2013, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1896380.

  • Light, P. C. (2008). The search for social entrepreneurship. Washington: Brookings Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundström, A., & Zhou, C. (2011). Promoting innovation based on social sciences and technologies: the prospect of a social innovation park. European Journal of Social Science Research, 24(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K., & Walls, J. (2009). Mission, Inc.: the practitioner’s guide to social enterprise. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and technology-specific. Research Policy, 25(3), 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyskens, M., Robb-Post, C., Stamp, J. A., Carsrud, A. L., & Reynolds, P. D. (2010). Social ventures from a resource-based perspective: An exploratory study assessing global Ashoka fellows. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 661–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T. W., Lumpkin, G. T. & Short, J. (2008), ‘The dependent variables of social entrepreneurship research’, paper given at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference (BCERC), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 5–7 June. Retrieved May 29, 2013, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1348117.

  • Nicholls, A. (2009). We do good things, don’t we? ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 755–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. & Cho, A. H. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: the structuration of a field. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change (pp. 99–118). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A. C. & Santos, F. (2009). Damned if we do, damned if we don’t: organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands (INSEAD Working Paper 2009/12/EFE/OB/ISIC).

    Google Scholar 

  • PLAN (2011). Planned Lifetime Advocacy Network. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from plan.ca.

  • Water for People (2013). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.waterforpeople.org/extras/playpumps/update-on-playpumps.html.

  • Porter, M. & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth, Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Room to Read (2012). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.roomtoread.org/AboutUs.

  • Santos, Filipe M. (2010). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship, 15 February, INSEAD Working Paper 2009/23/EFE/INSEAD. Retrieved May 29, 2013, fromhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1553072.

  • Saúde Criança (2013). Associação Saúde Criança. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.saudecrianca.org.br/en/quem-somos/.

  • SIP (2008). Social Innovation Park, Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.socialinnovationpark.org.

  • Smallbone, D., Evans, M., Ekanem, I. & Butters, S. (2001). Researching social enterprise: final report to the small business service, July, Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surie, G., & Ashley, A. (2008). Integrating pragmatism and ethics in entrepreneurial leadership for sustainable value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. A., & Zhang, D. D. (2010). The social entrepreneurship zone. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 22(2), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tactics of Hope (2008). The social engineers. Retrieved May 29, 2013, from http://www.tacticsofhope.org/social_entrepreneurs.

  • The Economist (2008). Doing good by doing very nicely indeed, 26 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship—a new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38(5), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Post, J. E. (1991). Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change. Public Administration Review, 51(5), 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a world without poverty: social business and the future of capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Lundström .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lundström, A., Zhou, C. (2014). Rethinking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprises: A Three-Dimensional Perspective. In: Lundström, A., Zhou, C., von Friedrichs, Y., Sundin, E. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01396-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics