Skip to main content

Increasing Flexibility and Productivity in Small Assembly Operations: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Despite the high production rates required in the automotive industry, some small components are being produced manually in peripheral countries where the labor costs are lower than in the middle of the Europe. When the production must be highly flexible, new challenges are placed and, in these cases, some companies adopt intensive labor processes. This work is based on an industrial demand in order to become an intensive labor process in intensive technology process, minimizing human intervention (without removing it), increasing productivity ensuring the quality, and maintaining the high flexibility already achieved in the assembly process of drive systems for automotive windscreen wiper. The equipment developed uses intensive technology through automation systems, needing an operator who is responsible by the initial feeding process. After that, all the process is automatic. The production cycle time is reduced from 11 to 7 s and the quality is ensured. The equipment is very flexible, allowing to assembly 20 different kinds of sets for the same purpose, changing just the gig where the main component is assembled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakravarty AK, Balakrishnan N (2001) Achieving product variety through optimal choice of module variations. IIE Trans 33(7):587–598

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klapper D (2005) An econometric analysis of product variety impact on competitive market conduct in consumer goods markets. OR Spectrum 27(4):583–601

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjaafar S, Kim J, Vishwanadham N (2004) On the effect of product variety in production-inventory systems. Ann Oper Res 126(1–4):71–101

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahn B (1998) Dynamic relationship with customers: high-variety strategies. J Acad Mark Sci 26(1):45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holweg M, Greenwood A (2001) Product variety, life cycles and rates of innovation: trends in the UK automotive industry. World Automotive Manufacturing, pp 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carvalho E (2005) Globalização e estratégias competitivas na indústria automobilística: uma abordagem a partir das principais montadoras instaladas no Brasil. Gestão Produção 12(1):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lancaster K (1990) The economics of product variety: a survey. Marketing Sci 9(3):189–206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagorny K, Colombo AW, Schmidtmann U (2012) A service- and multi-agent- oriented manufacturing automation architecture: an IEC 62264 level 2 compliant implementation. Comput Ind 63:813–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carpanzano E, Jovane F (2007) Advanced automation solutions for future adaptive factories. Ann CIRP 56(1):435–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michalos G, Makris S, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2010) Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher M, Ittner C (1999) The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: empirical evidence and simulation analysis. Manage Sci 45(6):771–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salvador F, Forza C, Rungtusanatham M (2002) Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions. J Oper Manage 20(5):549–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thonemann UW, Bradley JR (2002) The effect of product variety on supply-chain performance. Eur J Oper Res 143(3):548–569

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribeiro L, Barata J (2011) Re-thinking diagnosis for future automation systems: an analysis of current diagnostic practices and their applicability in emerging IT based production paradigms. Comput Ind 62:639–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter SL (2001/2002) Ergonomic evaluation of manufacturing system designs. J Manuf Syst 20(6):429–444

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shikdar AA, Hadhrami MA (2005) Operator performance and satisfaction in an ergonomically designed assembly workstation. J Eng Res 2(1):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shikdar A, Al-Hadhrami M (2007) Smart workstation design: an ergonomics and methods engineering approach. Int J Ind Syst Eng 2(4):363–374

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shinde GV, Jadhav VS (2012) Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using application of motion study. Int J Eng Technol 4(4):220–227

    Google Scholar 

  19. Battini D, Faccio M (2011) New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design. Int J Ind Ergon 41:30–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thun J-H, Lehr CB, Bierwirth M (2011) Feel free to feel comfortable—an empirical analysis of ergonomics in the German automotive industry. Int J Prod Econ 133:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saptari A, Lai WS (2011) Jig design, assembly line design and work station design and their effect to productivity. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng 5(1):9–16

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deros BM, Khamis NK (2011) An ergonomics study on assembly line workstation design. Am J Appl Sci 8(11):1195–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Isidori A (2009) Automation is for humans and for our environment. In: Nof SY (ed) Handbook of automation. Springer, Berlin, pp 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williams TJ (2009) Advances in industrial automation: historical perspectives. In: Nof SY (ed) Handbook of automation. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Jenkins H (2005) Manufacturing automation. In: Kurfess TR (ed) Robotics and automation handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiendahl H-P, Rybarczy A (2003) Using air streams for part feeding systems. J Mater Process Technol 138:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks ISEP—Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto due to its support. The authors wish to thanks Ing. Elsa Vieira, Ing. Ricardo Macedo, and Dr. Manuela Cardoso from DELFINGEN PT—PORTO, S.A., for their collaboration and commitment in providing the necessary data when this project starts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. G. Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nunes, P.M.S., Silva, F.J.G. (2013). Increasing Flexibility and Productivity in Small Assembly Operations: A Case Study. In: Azevedo, A. (eds) Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00557-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics