Skip to main content

Simulation Studies of Hybrid Pull Systems of Kanban and CONWIP in an Assembly Line

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Pull system is an important component of lean manufacturing that can effectively reduce typical wastes associated with push production systems, such as overproduction. Using Toyota’s Kanban system, a production line can be configured as a pull system to avoid unnecessary accumulation of Work in Process (WIP). Another common method to carry out a pull concept is the CONWIP line, which maintains a constant WIP level within a segment of production line. Both methods have proven effective, but they may have different characteristics. The objective of this paper is to explore the potential to combine Kanban and CONWIP methods into a robust hybrid pull system that preserves the advantages of both methods while minimizing the disadvantages of each individual method. A simulation study has been carried out based on a real-world assembly line. Various pull system configurations of the assembly line have been evaluated and compared in terms of WIP level, number of Kanban cards in system, and throughput. The study shows that the productivity of CONWIP configuration outperforms Kanban configuration in majority of scenarios; and the performance of a well designed hybrid system can be more robust to various scenarios, compared to Kanban and CONWIP system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Spearman LM, Woodruff LD, Hopp JW (1990) CONWIP: a pull alternative to Kanban. Int J Prod Res 28(5):879–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugimori Y, Kusunoki K, Cho F, Uchikawa K (1977) Toyota production system and Kanban system materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. Int J Prod Res 15(6):553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schonberger RJ (1986) World class manufacturing: the lessons of simplicity applied. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, University Park, IL

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pascal D (2007) Lean production simplified. Productivity Press, University Park, IL

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hopp JW, Spearman LM (2008) Factory physics, 3rd edn. Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall WR (1981) Driving the productivity machine: production planning and control in Japan. American Production and Inventory Control Society, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sato R, Khojasteh-Ghamari Y (2012) An integrated framework for card-based production control systems. J Intell Manuf 23(3):717–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khojasteh-Ghamari Y (2009) A performance comparison between Kanban and CONWIP controlled assembly systems. J Intell Manuf 20(6):750–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakhardande RA (2011) Performance comparison between Kanban and CONWIP through simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2011 industrial engineering research conference, Reno, NV

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghrayeb O, Phojanamongkolkij N, Tan BA (2009) A hybrid push/pull system in assemble-to-order manufacturing environment. Intell Manuf 20(4):379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olhager J, Oestlund B (1990) An integrated push/pull manufacturing strategy. Eur J Oper Res 45(2):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee CY (1993) A recent development of the integrated manufacturing system: a hybrid of MRP and JIT. Int J Oper Prod Manage 13(4):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beamon BM, Bermudo JM (2000) A hybrid push/pull control algorithm for multi-stage, multi-line production systems. Prod Plan Control 11(4):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takahashi K, Nakamura N (2004) Push pull, or hybrid control in supply chain management. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 17(2):126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cochran JK, Kaylani HA (2008) Optimal design of a hybrid push/pull serial manufacturing system with multiple part types. Int J Prod Res 46(4):949–965

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hung-da Wan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huang, Y., Wan, Hd., Kuriger, G., Chen, F.F. (2013). Simulation Studies of Hybrid Pull Systems of Kanban and CONWIP in an Assembly Line. In: Azevedo, A. (eds) Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_125

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_125

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00557-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics