Skip to main content

Post-Earthquake Risk-Based Decision Making Methodology for Turkish School Buildings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Structures

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 26))

Abstract

Safety assessment of damaged school buildings is one of the challenging tasks after damaging earthquakes. In this study, a new post-earthquake safety assessment method is proposed for school buildings. The method enables researchers to evaluate the level of risk and to judge the safety of the school building by taking into account the observed level of structural and non-structural damage. First, the vulnerability of the building is identified by considering the relevant damage indicators. Subsequently, the likely consequences of the various performance levels of the school building are identified. The likelihood of a specific consequence is evaluated by jointly considering all failure mechanisms that can lead to the considered consequence. Critical decisions regarding the school are made based on the level of risk and the available resources for risk mitigation. The methodology is expected to be a useful supporting tool for the post-earthquake decision-making process. Using the proposed method, critical decisions, such as continued use, strengthening or decommissioning school buildings can be handled in a rational and consistent way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aslani H, Miranda E (2005) Probability-based seismic response analysis. Eng Struct 27:1151–1163. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA, Krawinkler H (2000) Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News. http://peer.berkeley.edu/news/2000spring/index.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2012

  • Gülkan P (2004) Obstacles to improving seismic safety of school buildings in Turkey. In: Yelland H, Tucker B (eds) Keeping schools safe in earthquakes. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Gür T, Pay AC, Ramirez JA, Sözen MA, Johnson AM, İrfanoğlu A, Bobet A (2009) Performance of school buildings in Turkey during the 1999 Düzce and the 2003 Bingöl earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 25:239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinidis D, Makris A (2009) Experimental and analytical studies on the response of freestanding laboratory equipment to earthquake shaking. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:827–848. doi:10.1002/eqe.871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunnath SK (2007) Application of the PEER PBEE methodology to the I-880 viaduct. PEER 2006/10, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Earthquake Code (1975) Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Earthquake Code (1998) Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Earthquake Code (2007) Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazgan U, Dazio A (2012) Post-earthquake damage assessment using residual displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:1257–1276. doi:10.1002/eqe.1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüzügüllü Ö, Barbarosoglu G, Erdik M (2004) Seismic risk mitigation practices of school buildings in Istanbul. In: Yelland H, Tucker B (eds) Keeping schools safe in earthquakes. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the devoted educators in Van who guided the authors in the region after the 2011 earthquake disaster for their helpful support. In addition, the support provided by the Ministry of Education and Istanbul Technical University, which enabled the authors to observe the post-earthquake states of the affected schools, is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ufuk Yazgan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yazgan, U., Oyguç, R.A. (2014). Post-Earthquake Risk-Based Decision Making Methodology for Turkish School Buildings. In: Ilki, A., Fardis, M. (eds) Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Structures. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00458-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics