Skip to main content

Popularity and Similarity Among Friends: An Agent-Based Model for Friendship Development

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 743 Accesses

Abstract

This work investigates how local preferences, social structural constraints and randomness might affect the development of the friendship network in Facebook. We do this by analyzing a snapshot Facebook dataset of Princeton University’s students, and by building an agent-based simulation for comparison. Several different, but plausible, processes of friendship network development are proposed in which the structural information of the growing network and the student preferences are taken into account and then compared with the data. ‘Network formation based on personal preference and social structure with some randomness’ matches the data best, and is thus the preferred hypothesis for the way that students add “friends” on Facebook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbas S (2011) An agent-based model of the development of friendship links within Facebook. In: 7th European social simulation association conference, Montpellier, France

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbas S (2011) Ethnic diversity in Facebook. Methodology. Manchester. Retrieved from http://www.cfpm.org/~ali/FacebookReport/FacebookOnomapGroupReport.pdf

  3. Adamic L, Buyukkokten O, Adar E (2003) A social network caught in the web. First Monday 8:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agarwal A, Chakrabarti S (2007) Learning random walks to rank nodes in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning (ICML’07), pp 9–16. doi:10.1145/1273496.1273498

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Airoldi EM, Blei DM, Fienberg SE, Xing EP (2008) Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels. J Mach Learn Res 9:1981–2014. Retrieved from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3119541&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Backstrom L, Leskovec J (2011) Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pp 635–644. doi:10.1145/1935826.1935914

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007) The benefits of Facebook “Friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput-Mediat Commun 12(4):1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao B, Liu T, Wei W, Wang T (2011) Semi-supervised ranking on very large graphs with rich metadata. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, vol 49, pp 96–104. doi:10.1145/2020408.2020430

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gjoka M, Kurant M, Butts C (2009) Unbiased sampling of Facebook. Search, pp 1–15. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Unbiased+Sampling+of+Facebook#0

  12. Golder SA, Wilkinson D, Huberman BA (2007) Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network. In: Steinfield C, Pentland B, Lewis AK et al. (eds) Social networks, vol 30, pp 330–342

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamill L (2010) Communications, travel and social networks since 1840: a study using agent-based models. In: Social networks

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamill L, Gilbert N (2008) A simple but more realistic agent-based model of a social network. In: Proceedings of European social simulation association annual conference, Brescia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson MO, Rogers BW (2007) Meeting strangers and friends of friends: how random are social networks? Am Econ Rev 97(3):890–915. doi:10.1257/aer.97.3.890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim M (2010) Multiplicative attribute graph model of real-world networks. Internet Math 8(1–2):113–160. doi:10.1080/15427951.2012.625257

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krackhardt D, Stern RN (2011) Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation ∗. Soc Psychol Q 51(2):123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar R, Novak J (2010) Structure and evolution of online social networks. In: Link mining: models, algorithms, and applications, pp 337–357. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/X246586QW2477685.pdf

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurant M, Gjoka M, Butts C (2011) Walking on a graph with a magnifying glass: stratified sampling via weighted random walks. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 39:241–252. doi:10.1145/2007116.2007145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis K, Kaufman J, Gonzalez M, Wimmer A, Christakis N (2008) Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Soc Netw 30(4):330–342. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marmaros D, Sacerdote B (2006) How do friendships form? Q J Econ 121(1):79–119. doi:10.1162/003355306776083563

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer A (2009) Online social networks in economics. Decis Support Syst 47(3):169–184. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayer A, Puller SL (2008) The old boy (and girl) network: social network formation on university campuses. J Public Econ 92:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27(1):415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mislove A, Marcon M, Gummadi KP, Druschel P, Bhattacharjee S, Bhattacharjee B (2007) Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on internet measurement (IMC’07), p 29. doi:10.1145/1298306.1298311

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Mislove A, Viswanath B, Gummadi KP, Druschel P (2010) You are who you know: inferring user profiles in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on web search and data mining, pp 251–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Newman M (2003) Mixing patterns in networks. Phys Rev E 67:026126. Retrieved from http://pre.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v67/i2/e026126

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Panzarasa P, Opsahl T, Carley KM (2009) Patterns and dynamics of users’ behavior and interaction: network analysis of an online community. J Am Soc Inf Sci 60(5):911–932. doi:10.1002/asi.21015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pattison P (1996) Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks. Psychometrika 61(3):401–425. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/T2W46715636R2H11.pdf

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Singer HM, Singer I, Herrmann HJ (2009) Agent-based model for friendship in social networks. Phys Rev E, Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 80(2):026113. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19792206

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Traud A, Kelsic E, Mucha P (2008) Community structure in online collegiate social networks. Organization, pp 1–15. Retrieved from http://www.uvm.edu/~pdodds/files/papers/others/2008/traud2008a.pdf

  32. Wilson C, Boe B, Sala A, Puttaswamy KPN, Zhao BY (2009) User interactions in social networks and their implications. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM European conference on Computer systems (EuroSys’09), p 205. doi:10.1145/1519065.1519089

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would thank our colleagues at the Centre for Policy Modelling for their helpful comments and feedback. We also would like to thank Mason Porter of Oxford University, who shared the underlying dataset with us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sma Abbas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abbas, S. (2013). Popularity and Similarity Among Friends: An Agent-Based Model for Friendship Development. In: Gilbert, T., Kirkilionis, M., Nicolis, G. (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00395-5_77

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics