Skip to main content

Quantum Gravity: A Heretical Vision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Fundamental Physics and Physics Education Research

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 145))

Abstract

The goal of this work is to contribute to the development of a background-independent, non-perturbative approach to quantization of the gravitational field based on the conformal and projective structures of space-time. But first I attempt to dissipate some mystifications about the meaning of quantization, and foster an ecumenical, non-competitive approach to the problem of quantum gravity (QG), stressing the search for relations between different approaches in any overlapping regions of validity. Then I discuss some topics for further research based on the approach we call unimodular conformal and projective relativity (UCPR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amelino-Camelia G, Stachel J (2009) Measurement of the space-time interval between two events using the retarded and advanced times of each event with respect to a time-like world-line. GRG J Gen Relat Gravit 41:1107–1124

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashtekar A, Rovelli C (1992) A loop representation for the Quantum Maxwell field. Class Quan Gravit 9:1121–1150

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann P, Smith G (1982) Measurability analysis of the linearized gravitational field. Gen Relat Gravit 14:1131–1166

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohr N (1957) Atoms and human knowledge. A public lecture delivered on December 13, Holmberg Hall, Norman, Oklahoma. http://www.nhn.ou.edu/Bohr-lecture-OU-1957.shtml

  5. Bradonjić K, Stachel J (2012) Unimodular conformal and projective relativity. Euro Phys Lett 97:10001

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christian J (1997) Exactly soluble sector of quantum gravity, Phys Rev D56: 4844–4877

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crenshaw M, Bowden C (2002) On quantization of the fields in dielectrics. J Modern Optics 49:511–517

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeWitt B (2004) The global approach to quantum field theory, vol 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Einstein A (1952) Do gravitational fields play an essential part in the structure of the elementary particles of matter. The principle of relativity, Dover Publications, pp 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Einstein A (1956) Autobiographische Skizze. In: C. Seelig (ed) Helle Zeit-Dunkle Zeit, Euro Verlag, Zürich/Stuttgart/Wien, pp 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ginzburg V (1989) Applications of electrodynamics in theoretical physics and astrophysics, Chapter 7. The Cerenkov and Doppler effects, Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 123–158

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hadamard J (1952) Lectures on Cauchy’s problem in linear partial differential equations. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mehra J, Rechenberg H (2001) The historical development of quantum theory, Superconductivity, Superfluidity, and Further Progress in Condensed Matter Physics (Sect. 2.3), Part 2, vol 6. Springer, New York 1947–1974:1159–1184

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rovelli C (2004) Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Smolin L (2000) Three roads to quantum gravity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stachel J (1984) The generally covariant form of Maxwell’s equations. In: Berger MS (ed) J.C. Maxwell: the sesquicentennial symposium/ new vistas in mathematics, science and technology, North- Holland, 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stachel J (1986) Do quanta need a new logic?. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Philosophical problems of modern physics, From quarks to quasars, pp 349–385

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stachel J (2006) Einstein’s intuition and the post-Newtonian approximation. In Topics in mathematical physics, general relativity and cosmology in honor of Jerzy Plebanski, World Scientific, Singapore, pp 453–467

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stachel J (2011) Conformal and projective structures in general relativity. Gen Relat Gravit 43:3399–4309

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephani H (1990) General relativity: an introduction to the theory of the gravitational field, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Thorne K (1980) Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 52:299–339

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stachel, J. (2014). Quantum Gravity: A Heretical Vision. In: Sidharth, B., Michelini, M., Santi, L. (eds) Frontiers of Fundamental Physics and Physics Education Research. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00297-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics