Skip to main content

Gas-Liquid-Solid Volumetric Phase Distribution Estimation in a Cold Slurry Bubble Column System for Hydro-Conversion Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational and Experimental Fluid Mechanics with Applications to Physics, Engineering and the Environment

Abstract

Hydro-cracking slurry bubble column design, scale-up, and operation are strongly influenced by a fluid-dynamic parameter known as volumetric phase distribution. This parameter depends on the operating conditions (gas flow, liquid flow, pressure, and temperature) as well as on the gas, liquid, and solid physical properties. Experiments were carried out at ambient temperature and atmosphere pressure (cold conditions) in a 120 mm inner diameter plexiglas column (without any gas sparger) with air and \(\mathrm{{CO}}_{2}\), mineral oil, and coke with average particle sizes of 630 microns. The column was operated to up-flow continuous recirculation with superficial gas velocities ranging from 3 to 10 cm/s and a constant liquid-solid flow about 29 l/h. Experimental measurements were done by two methods: direct phase trapping and pressure drop. Measurement results indicate that the volumetric gas phase is highly affected by the superficial gas velocity. However, the superficial gas velocity effect on solid concentration is negligible. The experimental results were also compared with experimental data from other authors, obtaining a good agreement. A gas volumetric phase correlation was proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akita K, Yoshida F (1973) Gas holdup and volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 12:76–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs HD, Brill J (1973) A study of two-phase flow in inclined pipes. J Petrol Technol 25:607–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Behkish A, Lemoine R, Sehabiague L, Oukaci R, Morsi BI (2007) Gas holdup and bubble size behavior in a large-slurry bubble column reactor operating with an organic liquid under elevated pressure and temperatures. Chem Eng J 128:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chengtian W, Kelsey S, Muthanna H (2008) Bubble dynamics investigation in a slurry bubble column. American Ins Chem Eng 54:1203–1212

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu T-M, Hoh Y-C, Wang W-K (1987) Dispersed-phase hydrodynamic characteristics and mass transfer in three-phase (liquid-liquid) fluidized beds. Ind Eng Chem Res 26:712–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dargar P, Macchi A (2006) Effect of surface-active agents on the phase holdups of three-phase fluidized beds. Chem Eng Process 45:764–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan L-S, Yang GQM, Lee DJ, Tsuchiya K, Luo X (1999) Some aspects of high-pressure phenomena of bubble in liquids and liquid-solid suspensions. Chem Eng Sci 54:4681–4709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith P, Woou LC, Cheong HP, Pearson JF (1975) Two phase pressure drop in inclined and vertical oil wells. M.I.T. Cambrige, USA (SPE 5667-MS), p 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Guitian J, Joseph D (1997) How bubbly mixture foam and foam control using a fluidized bed. Int J Multiph Flow 21:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn AR, Brown KE (1965) Experimental study of pressure gradients occurring during continuous two-phase flow in small-diameter vertical conduits. J Petroleum Tech 17:475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hikita H, Asai K, Tanigawa K, Segawa K, Kitao M (1980) Gas hold-up in bubble columns. Chem Eng J 20:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hikita H, Asai K, Tanigawa K, Segawa K, Kitao M (1981) The volumetric liquid-phase mass transfer coeficient in bubble colums. Chem Eng J 22:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefsloot H, Krishna R (1993) Influence of gas density on the stability of homogeneous flow in bubble columns. Ind Eng Chem Res 32:747–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inga J, Morsi B (1999) Effect of operating variables on the gas holdup in a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor operating with an organic liquid mixture. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:928–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jena H, Sahho B, Roy G, Meikap B (2008) Prediction of gas holdup in a three-phase fluidized bed from bed pressure drop measurement. Chem Eng Res Des 86:1301–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantarci N, Borak F, Ulgen KO (2005) Bubble column reactors. Process Biochem 40:2263–2283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna R, Wilkinson PM, van Dierendock LL (1991) A model for gas holdup in bubble columns incorporating the influence of gas density on flow regine transitions. Chem Eng Sci 46:2491–2496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra-Majumadar D, Farouk D, Shah T, Macken N, Oh Y (1998) Two- and three-phase flows in bubble columns: tumerical predictions and measurements. Ind Eng Chem Res 37:2284–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray P, Fan L (1989) Axial solid distribution in slurry bubble columns. Ind Eng Chem Res 28:1697–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino LZ, Yépez MM, Sáez AE, De Drago G (1990) An experimental study of gas holdup in two-phase bubble columns with foaming liquids. Chem Eng Comm 89:155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino LZ, Yépez MM, Sáez AE (1990) Hydrodynamics of a semi-batch slurry bubble column a foaming liquid. AIChE J 36:1758–1962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino LZ, Solari RB, Siquier S, Estévez LA, Yépez MM, Saez AE (1992) Effect of operating conditions on gas holdup in slurry bubble columns with a foaming liquid. Chem Eng Comm 177:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah YT, Kelkar BG, Godbole SP (1982) Design parameters estimations for bubble column reactors. AlChE J 28(3):353–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DN, Fuchs W, Lynn RJ, Smith DH, Hess M (1984) Bubble behavior in a slurry column reactor model. Chemical and catalytic reactor modeling. ACS Symp Ser 237:125–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai-Ming C, Ying C, Wai Ko W (1987) Dispersed-phase hydrodynamic characteritics and mass transfer in three-phase (liquid-liquid) fluidized beds. Ind Eng Chem Res 26:712–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Urseanu M, Guit RPM, Stankiewicz A, van Kranenburg G, Lommen JHGM (2003) Influence of operating pressure on the gas hold-up in bubble columns for high viscous media. Chem Eng Sci 58:697–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenge F, Yusuf C, Murray M (1995) A new method for the measurement of solids holdup in gas-liquid-solid three-phase systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 34:928–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel V. Paiva-Rojas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paiva-Rojas, M.V., Contreras-Andrade, V., Araujo, S.C. (2014). Gas-Liquid-Solid Volumetric Phase Distribution Estimation in a Cold Slurry Bubble Column System for Hydro-Conversion Processes. In: Sigalotti, L., Klapp, J., Sira, E. (eds) Computational and Experimental Fluid Mechanics with Applications to Physics, Engineering and the Environment. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00191-3_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics