Abstract
In the architecture of Sinan, the most important element is the dome, which forms the central point of the whole structure; therefore the overall structure of the building is oriented towards carrying and supporting the dome. The system of relationships between the elements establishing the dimensions and constituting the buildings has been based upon the dimensions of the human body. These dimensions were observed in storey layers related to the façade, in the choice of the proportions of building elements such as windows and doors, and in calculating the proportional relations of such elements/details. Sinan, who was called “the Euclid of his age”, developed a system of forms through an understanding of architecture based on geometry, and through the consideration of functions. Examples of Sinan’s use of mathematical principles are found on the Suleymaniye Mosque, whose huge dome placed at the epicenter of the complex design.
First published as: Zafer Sagdic, “Ottoman Architecture: Relationships between Architectural Design and Mathematics in Architect Sinan ’s Works”, pp. 123–132 in Nexus III: Architecture and Mathematics, ed. Kim Williams, Ospedaletto (Pisa): Pacini Editore, 2000.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Namaz is originally from Persian; it is salat in Arabic. In a general view it means praying and giving greetings to Allah, the one and the only creator, the God.
References
Arpat, Atilla. 1981. Osmanli Dini Mimarisi’nde Modul ve Duzenleyici Geometri. MTRE Bulteni 13-14 (1981): 29–35.
———. 1984. Osmanli Camileri’nde Modüler Düzen ve Boyutsal Sembolizm. Yapi 54, 2 (1984): 40–42.
Beardsley, Monroe. 1958. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Michigan: Harcourt College Publishers.
De Launay, Marie, Boghoz Chachian, Em Maillard, P. Montani, and Pascal Sebah. 1873. L'architecture Ottomane/Die Ottomanische Baukunst. Constantinople.
Egli, E. 1954. Sinan der Baumeister Ossmanischer Glanzzeit. Stuttgart: Verlag für Architektur Erlenbach.
Freely, J. and A. Burelli. 1992. Sinan. New York and London: Thames and Hudson.
Goodwin, G. 1997. Ottoman Architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.
Haidar S and H. Yazar. 1986. Implict Intentions and Explicit Order in Sinan’s Work, II. Pp. 29–42 in Uluslararasi Turk ve Islam Tarihi Kongresi, Cilt no. 2. Istanbul: Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
King, Jerry. 1997. Matematik Sanati. 2nd edn. Ankara: Tubitak.
Kuban, D. 1988. Sinan’in Dünya Mimarisindeki Yeri. Pp 581–624 in Mimarbagi Koca Sinan. Istanbul: Vgmy.
Sağdiç, Z. 1998. Mathematics and Design Relationship in Architecture. Pp. 383–391 in Mathematics & Design 98. Proceedings of the Second International Conference. Javier Barrallo ed. San Sebastian, Spain: The University of the Basque Country.
Schemmel, A. 1998. Saylarin Gizemi. Istanbul: Kabalci.
Soylemezoglu, K. 1986. Istanbul Rustem Pasa Camii. Pp. 105-114 in Uluslararasi Turk ve Islam Tarihi Kongresi, Cilt no.2. Istanbul: Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
Tuncer, N. 1997. Klasik Dönem Osmanli Mimarisi’nde Iç mekan ve Cephelerde Oran. Ph.D. thesis. Yildiz Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sağdiç, Z. (2015). Ottoman Architecture: Relationships between Architectural Design and Mathematics in Sinan’s Works. In: Williams, K., Ostwald, M. (eds) Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00143-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00143-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00142-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00143-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)