Skip to main content

Mathematics and Architecture Since 1960

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future

Abstract

This present survey, based on personal experiences, focuses on the role that mathematical thought plays in furthering generic knowledge of architectural form, and is organised around the three categories identified by Froebel’s proposal for the study of form—quantitative, qualitative and relational . Quantitative studies measure the various material dimensions of form: length, area, volume. The quantitative relationships between building forms, heights, areas of sites, road widths, open areas are examined in early “land use and built form studies”. Qualitative studies of form emphasize spatial transformations, the modern group theory of symmetry, and topological relations. Distinct architectural forms may well be equivalent under symmetry, or topology. An example is given of an application of Polya’s enumeration theorem. Relational studies of form were said, by Froebel, to be “forms of life”. Relations of dimensions, symmetries and topology are now addressed by advances in shape computation.

First published as: Lionel March , “Architecture and Mathematics Since 1960”, pp. 9–33 in Nexus IV: Architecture and Mathematics, Kim Williams and Jose Francisco Rodrigues, eds. Fucecchio (Florence): Kim Williams Books, 2002.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    First in architecture at Cambridge University, for two years in urban studies at Harvard and MIT, back at Cambridge as Director of the Centre for Land Use and Built Form Studies, then in systems engineering at the University of Waterloo, in design technology at The Open University, later at the Royal College of Art, London, and—for the last two decades—in architecture and urban design at the University of California, Los Angeles, with a 6-month stop-over as a consultant at The National University of Singapore.

  2. 2.

    For example, I co-authored a paper with the graph theorists Frank Harary in the USA and R. W. Robinson in Australia in 1978 entirely by correspondence. I met Harary some years later at a cocktail party in Cambridge, but Robinson, never.

  3. 3.

    Professor of Architecture, University of Cambridge. Best known in Portugal for his work at the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, but more widely for the Royal Festival Hall, London.

  4. 4.

    Friedrich Froebel (1782–1852) pioneered the modern study of form. He employed the three Aristotelian categories of quantity, quality and relation in structuring the educational content of his “gifts” which ran the gamut from solid, plane, line to point in descending order of concreteness, and ascending order of abstraction. His categories were “forms of knowledge” in which quantitative aspects are studied; “forms of beauty” in which the qualities of spatial transformations and symmetries come into play; and “forms of life” in which the forms are related to actual objects—a house, a bath, a chair, and so on. I use these categories to organize this chapter.

  5. 5.

    Engineer Sr. Luis Lobato was an enthusiastic protagonist of this work.

  6. 6.

    Information extracted from AAAS (2000a, b).

  7. 7.

    The unit of distance taken in this example is half a block length. The mathematical question of mean distances is addressed in Baglivo and Graver (1983: 98–111). An architectural investigation of built forms is found in Tabor (1971). On the assumption that all trips are equally likely, it should be noted that the compact city-section favors short trips over the other two configurations, whereas the annular form has an even distribution. In practice, trips are not likely to be equiprobable, and this needs to be factored in according to expectations.

  8. 8.

    For a practical application of these ideas to the Central Region of Chile, see Echenique (1994).

  9. 9.

    “Ruralize the urban, urbanize the rural…fill the earth.” I was first introduced to the works of Ildefons Cerdà by Dr. Marcial Echenique who had joined LUBFS from Barcelona to direct the urban systems study. A useful summary is Soria y Puig (1999).

  10. 10.

    The Sonoran Desert covers about 222,700 km2. in California and Arizona in the United States, and Baja California and Sonora in Mexico. It is the subject of a case study by the Nature Conservancy in AAAS (2000a: 188–89). In 1995 the regional population was 5.5 million, growing at the rate of 3.0 % per year.

  11. 11.

    Froebel had trained as an architect in Frankfurt, but became an assistant to Christian Samuel Weiss, one of the founders of the modern science of crystallography.

  12. 12.

    Joseph-Louis Lagrange (1736–1813) was the founding Professor of Mathematics at L’Ecole Polytecnique, Paris, during the tenure of the architect J. N. L Durand in the stereotomy department under Abbé Haüy—Weiss’s French rival in the architecture of crystal forms.

  13. 13.

    There are just seven non-infinite spherical groups in space, two each associated with the Platonic duals, the cube/octahedron and the dodecahedron/icosahedron, and three related to the self-dual tetrahedron.

  14. 14.

    The interior of La Rotonda has the subsymmetry D2.

  15. 15.

    This concept arose initially from Newman (1964). Newman had directed the effort to build the world’s first programmable, electronic computer at the University of Manchester, 21 June 1948. He is especially regarded for having recruited Alan Turing —of Turing Machine fame—to his staff.

  16. 16.

    This Boolean description of a building appears in March and Steadman (1971: 121–144). It was subsequently elaborated in March (1976).

  17. 17.

    See, for example, Steadman , P. (1983). Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans. London: Pion Ltd.

  18. 18.

    “Meng Ker introduced me to the book—(March 1972)—and from there we did some morphological studies together and he did his thesis on Woodlands, one neighbourhood of Woodlands. And he redesigned a neighbourhood, the typical HDB [Housing Development Board] neighbourhood which was 10, 12, storeys at that time. He redesigned it to 5, 6 storeys, with one-third of the dwellings having gardens. So, to answer your question, are there alternatives to HDB, there are plenty of alternatives” (Bay 1998).

  19. 19.

    See Pólya et al. (1983), where the lively “voice” of the nonagenarian Pólya can be heard still teaching at Stanford University, California.

  20. 20.

    For an excellent introduction to Polyá’s work in the design context, I recommend (Economou 1999).

  21. 21.

    See Duarte (2005a, b). Stiny and Knight were among Duarte’s Ph.D. advisors.

  22. 22.

    The work of Dr. Mário Júlio Teixeira Krüger, University of Coimbra, relates the space syntax tradition with the LUBFS approach. Dr. Nuno Portas was an important link with the Cambridge school following the 1974 Portuguese Revolution, as was Manuel Solá-Morales Rubó in Barcelona, who steered through the 1975 Spanish edition of Urban Space and Structures.

References

  • [AAAS] American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2000a. AAAS Atlas of Population and Environment. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000b. Millennium World Atlas. New York: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. 1964. Notes Towards a Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglivo, J. A. and Graver, J. E. 1983. Incidence and Symmetry in Design and Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, P. 1998. Interview with Philip Bay and Architecture Students from NUS on SPUR, transcribed by Dinesh Naidu. http://www.rubanisation.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=287:interview-with-philip-bay-and-architecture-students-from-nus-on-spur-transcribed-by-dinesh-naidu&catid=40:articles&Itemid=56. Accessed 27 November 2013.

  • Duarte, J. P. 2005a. A Discursive Grammar for Customizing Mass Housing: the case of Siza’s houses at Malagueira. Automation in Construction 14, 2 (March 2005): 265–275..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005b. Towards the Mass Customization of Housing: the grammar of Siza’s houses at Malagueira. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32, 3 (May 2005): 347–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, C. F. and March, L. 1979. Architectural applications of graph theory. In R. J. Wilson and L. W. Beineke, eds. Applications of Graph Theory. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echenique, M. 1994. ‘Let’s build in lines’ revisited. Planning and Design, 21, 7: pp. s95-s105. London: Pion Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economou, A. 1999. The symmetry lessons from Froebel building gifts. Planning and Design, 26, 13: pp. 75–90. London: Pion Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. W. 1994. Transformations in Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L. and Earl, C. F. 1977. On counting architectural plans. Environment and Planning B, 4: pp. 57–80. London: Pion Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L. and Steadman, P. 1971. The Geometry of Environment. London: RIBA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L. 1972. Elementary Models of Built Forms. Pp. 55–96 in L. Martin and L. March, Urban Space and Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. A Boolean description of a class of built forms. Pp. 41–73 in L. March, ed. The Architecture of Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. From sky-scraping to land-hugging. Commentary. Journal of The National University of Singapore Society, 10 (December): pp. 12–19. Singapore: National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. H. A. 1964. Elements of the Topology of Plane Sets of Points. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papalambros, P. Y. and Shea, K. 2001. Creating structural configurations. Pp. 93–125 in E. K. Antonsson and J. Cagan, eds. Formal Engineering Design Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. 1996. Schindler, symmetry and the Free Public Library, 1920. Architectural Research Quarterly, 2 (Winter): pp. 72–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G., Tarjan, R. E. and Woods, D. R. 1983. Notes on Introductory Combinatorics. Boston: Birkhaüser.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, K. 2000. Generating rational free-form structures. Pp. 118–128 in Proceedings: Digital Creativity Symposium. London: University of Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soria y, Puig, A., ed. 1999. Cerdà: The Five Bases of the General Theory of Urbanization. Madrid: Electa Espanã.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, P. 1983. Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans. London: Pion Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G. 1990. What is a design? Planning and Design, 17: pp. 97–103. London: Pion Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. How to calculate with shapes. Pp. 20–64 in E. K. Antonsson and J. Cagan, eds. Formal Engineering Design Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, P. 1971. Traffic in Buildings. Ph.D. Diss., University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I dedicate this chapter to the memory of Dr. John Ashby (1928–1999), a biochemist, and who, as a publisher with Pion Limited, London, had the foresight and courage to nurture and promote the journal Environment and Planning B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lionel March .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

March, L. (2015). Mathematics and Architecture Since 1960. In: Williams, K., Ostwald, M. (eds) Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00143-2_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics