Abstract
It is very unusual for a mathematical or physical idea to disseminate into the society at large. An interesting example is chaos theory, popularized by Lorenz’s butterfly effect: “does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?” A tiny cause can generate big consequences! Mathematicians (and non mathematicians) have known this fact for a long time! Can one adequately summarize chaos theory is such a simple minded way? In this review paper, I would like first of all to sketch some of the main steps in the historical development of the concept of chaos in dynamical systems, from the mathematical point of view. Then, I would like to present the present status of the Lorenz attractor in the panorama of the theory, as we see it Today.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. Abraham and S. Smale, Nongenericity of Ω-stability. Global Analysis (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIV, Berkeley, Calif., 1968) pp. 5–8 Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I. 1970.
V.S. Afraimovich, V.V. Bykov and L.P. Shil’nikov, The origin and structure of the Lorenz attractor. (En russe), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 234 no. 2, 336–339 (1977).
D.V. Anosov, Roughness of geodesic flows on compact Riemannian manifolds of negative curvature. (En russe), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 145, 707–709 (1962).
D.V. Anosov, Dynamical systems in the 1960s: the hyperbolic revolution. Mathematical events of the twentieth century, 1–17, Springer, Berlin, 2006.
A. Andronov. and L. Pontrjagin, Systèmes grossiers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 14 (1937).
V. Araújo, E.R. Pujals, M.J. Pacifico and M. Viana, Singular-hyperbolic attractors are chaotic. Transactions of the A.M.S. 361, 2431–2485 (2009).
V. Arnold, Sur la géométrie différentielle des groupes de Lie de dimension infinie et ses applications à l’hydrodynamique des fluides parfaits. Annales de l’institut Fourier 16 no. 1, 319–361 (1966).
D. Aubin and A. Dahan Dalmedico, Writing the history of dynamical systems and chaos: longue durée and revolution, disciplines and cultures. Historia Math. 29 no. 3, 273–339 (2002).
A. Arroyo and E. Pujals, Dynamical properties of singular-hyperbolic attractors. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 19 no. 1, 67–87 (2007).
A. Arroyo and F. Rodriguez Hertz, Homoclinic bifurcations and uniform hyperbolicity for three-dimensional flows. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 20 no. 5, 805–841 (2003).
J. Barrow-Green, Poincaré and the three body problem. History of Mathematics, 11. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; London Mathematical Society, London, 1997. xvi+272 pp.
F. Béguin, Le mémoire de Poincaré pour le prix du roi Oscar. In L’ héritage scientifique de Poincaré, éd. Charpentier, Ghys, Lesne, éditions Belin 2006.
G.D. Birkhoff, Nouvelles recherches sur les systèmes dynamiques. Mem. Pont. Acad. Sci. Nov. Lyncaei 53, 85–216 (1935).
J. Birman and I. Kofman, A new twist on Lorenz links. J. Topol. 2 no. 2, 227–248 (2009).
J. Birman and R.F. Williams, Knotted periodic orbits in dynamical systems, I. Lorenz’s equations. Topology 22 no. 1, 47–82 (1983).
C. Bonatti, L. Díaz and M. Viana, Dynamics beyond uniform hyperbolicity. A global geometric and probabilistic perspective. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 102. Mathematical Physics, III. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005.
R. Bowen, Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 470, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.
R. Bowen, On Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, No. 35. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1978. vii+45 pp.
R. Bowen and D. Ruelle, The ergodic theory of Axiom A flows. Invent. Math. 29 no. 3, 181–202 (1975).
G.L. Buffon, Du Soufre. Histoire Naturelle des minéraux, tome 2, 1783.
L.A. Bunimovich, Statistical properties of Lorenz attractors. Nonlinear dynamics and turbulence, Pitman, p. 7192, 1983.
P. Dehornoy, Les noeuds de Lorenz. to be published in L’Enseignement mathématique, arXiv:0904.2437
P. Duhem, La théorie physique; son objet, sa structure. 1906. English transl. by P.P. Wiener, The aim and structure of physical theory, Princeton University Press, 1954.
S. Galatolo and M.J. Pacifico, Lorenz-like flows: exponential decay of correlations for the Poincaré map, logarithm law, quantitative recurrence. Ergod. Th. Dynam. Sys. 30, 1703–1737 (2010).
R. Ghrist, Branched two-manifolds supporting all links. Topology 36 no. 2, 423–448 (1997).
E. Ghys, Knots and dynamics. International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. I, pp. 247–277, Eur. Math. Soc., Z¨urich, 2007.
E. Ghys, Right-handed vector fields & the Lorenz attractor. Jpn. J. Math 4 no. 1, 47–61 (2009).
E. Ghys and J. Leys, Lorenz and modular flows: a visual introduction. American Math. Soc. Feature Column, November 2006, www.ams.org/featurecolumn/archive/lorenz.html
J. Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science. Viking Penguin, 1987.
M. Gromov, Three remarks on geodesic dynamics and fundamental group. Enseign. Math. 46 no. 3–4, 391–402 (2002).
J. Guckenheimer, A strange, strange attractor. In The Hopf Bifurcation, Marsden and McCracken, eds. Appl. Math. Sci., Springer-Verlag, (1976).
J. Guckenheimer, The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors. Amer. Math. Monthly 91 no. 5, 325–326 (1984).
J. Guckenheimer and R.F. Williams, Structural stability of Lorenz attractors. Inst. Hautes études Sci. Publ. Math. 50, 59–72 (1979).
J. Hadamard, Les surfaces à courbures opposées et leurs lignes géodésiques. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées 5e série 4, 27–74 (1898).
J.T. Halbert and J.A. Yorke, Modeling a chaotic machine’s dynamics as a linear map on a “square sphere” . http://www.math.umd.edu/ halbert/taffy-paper-1.pdf
B. Hasselblatt, Hyperbolic dynamical systems. Handbook of dynamical systems, Vol. 1A, pp. 239–319, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.
M. Holland and I. Melbourne, Central limit theorems and invariance principles for Lorenz attractors. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 76 no. 2, 345–364 (2007).
J.-P. Kahane, Hasard et déterminisme chez Laplace. Les Cahiers Rationalistes 593 – mars–avril 2008.
S. Kuznetsov, Plykin-type attractor in nonautonomous coupled oscillators. Chaos 19, 013114 (2009).
O. Lanford, An introduction to the Lorenz system. Papers from the Duke Turbulence Conference (Duke Univ., Durham, N.C., 1976), Paper No. 4, i+21 pp. Duke Univ. Math. Ser., Vol. III, Duke Univ., Durham, N.C., 1977.
P.S. Laplace, Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. 1814. English transl. by A.I. Dale, Philosophical essay on probabilities, Springer, 1995
E.N. Lorenz, Maximum simplification of the dynamic equations. Tellus 12, 243–254 (1960).
E.N. Lorenz, The statistical prediction of solutions of dynamic equations. Proc. Internat. Sympos. Numerical Weather Prediction, Tokyo, pp. 629–635.
E.N. Lorenz, Deterministic non periodic flow. J. Atmosph. Sci. 20, 130–141 (1963).
E.N. Lorenz, Predictability: does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? 139th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (29 Dec. 1972), in Essence of Chaos (1995), Appendix 1, 181.
S. Luzzatto, I. Melbourne and F. Paccaut, The Lorenz attractor is mixing. Comm. Math. Phys. 260 no. 2, 393–401 (2005).
R. Mañé, An ergodic closing lemma. Ann. of Math. 116 no. 3, 503–540 (1982).
J.C. Maxwell, Matter and Motion. 1876, rééd. Dover (1952).
C.A. Morales, M.J. Pacifico and E.R. Pujals, Robust transitive singular sets for 3- flows are partially hyperbolic attractors or repellers. Ann. of Math. 160 no. 2, 375–432 (2004).
H.M. Morse, A one-to-one representation of geodesics on a surface of negative curvature. Amer. J. Math. 43 no. 1, 33–51 (1921).
J. Palis, A global view of dynamics and a conjecture on the denseness of finitude of attractors. Géométrie complexe et systèmes dynamiques (Orsay, 1995), Astérisque No. 261 (2000), xiii–xiv, pp. 335–347.
J. Palis, A global perspective for non-conservative dynamics. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 22 no. 4, 485–507 (2005).
J. Palis, Open questions leading to a global perspective in dynamics. Nonlinearity 21 no. 4, T37–T43 (2008).
J. Palis and F. Takens, Hyperbolicity and sensitive chaotic dynamics at homoclinic bifurcations. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993. x+234 pp.
M. Peixoto, Structural stability on two-dimensional manifolds. Topology 1, 101–120 (1962).
Ya.B. Pesin, Dynamical systems with generalized hyperbolic attractors: hyperbolic, ergodic and topological properties. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 12 no. 1, 123– 151 (1992).
H. Poincaré, Mémoire sur les courbes définies par une équation différentielle. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées 7, 375–422 (1881).
H. Poincaré, Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique. Acta Mathematica 13, 1–270 (1890).
H. Poincaré, Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, vol. 3, (1892–1899). English transl. New methods of celestial mechanics, D.L. Goroff (ed.), American Institute of Physics, 1993
H. Poincaré, Sur les lignes géodésiques des surfaces convexes. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 6, 237–274 (1905).
H. Poincaré, Le hasard. Revue du Mois 3, 257–276 (1907).
H. Poincaré, Science et méthode. Flammarion, (1908). English transl. by F. Maitland, Science and Method, T. Nelson and Sons, London, 1914.
A. Robadey, Différentes modalités de travail sur le général dans les recherches de Poincaré sur les systèmes dynamiques. Thèse, Paris 7, 2005.
R. Robert, L’effet papillon n’existe plus! Gaz. Math. 90, 11–25 (2001).
D. Ruelle, The Lorenz attractor and the problem of turbulence. Turbulence and Navier–Stokes equations (Proc. Conf., Univ. Paris-Sud, Orsay, 1975), pp. 146–158, Lecture Notes in Math., 565, Springer, Berlin, (1976).
D. Ruelle, A measure associated with axiom-A attractors, Amer. J. Math. 98 no. 3, 619–654 (1976).
D. Ruelle and F. Takens, On the nature of turbulence. Commun. Math. Phys. 20, 167–192 (1971).
L.P. Shil’nikov, Homoclinic trajectories: from Poincaré to the present. Mathematical events of the twentieth century, 347–370, Springer, Berlin, 2006.
M. Shub, What is \( \ldots \) a horseshoe?, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 52 no. 5, 516–517 (2005).
M. Shub, et S. Smale, Beyond hyperbolicity. Ann. of Math. (2) 96, 587–591(1972).
Ja.G. Sinai, Gibbs measures in ergodic theory. (En russe), Uspehi Mat. Nauk 27, no. 4(166), 21–64 (1972).
S. Smale, On dynamical systems. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana 5, 195–198 (1960).
S. Smale, A structurally stable differentiable homeomorphism with an infinite number of periodic points. Qualitative methods in the theory of non-linear vibrations (Proc. Internat. Sympos. Non-linear Vibrations, Vol. II, 1961) pp. 365–366 Izdat. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR, Kiev 1963.
S. Smale, Diffeomorphisms with many periodic points. Differential and Combinatorial Topology (A Symposium in Honor of Marston Morse) pp. 63–80, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J. 1965.
S. Smale, Structurally stable systems are not dense. Amer. J. Math. 88, 491–496 (1966).
S. Smale, Differentiable dynamical systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73, 747–817 (1967).
S. Smale, Finding a horseshoe on the beaches of Rio. Math. Intelligencer 20 no. 1, 39–44 (1998).
S. Smale, Mathematical problems for the next century. Math. Intelligencer 20 no. 2, 7–15 (1998).
C. Sparrow, The Lorenz equations: bifurcations, chaos, and strange attractors. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 41. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, (1982).
W. Tucker, A rigorous ODE solver and Smale’s 14th problem. Found. Comput. Math. 2 \( \spadesuit \), no. 1, 53–117 (2002).
M. Viana, What’s new on Lorenz strange attractors? Math. Intelligencer 22 no. 3, 6–19 (2000).
R.F. Williams, The structure of Lorenz attractors. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 50, 73–99 (1979).
R.F. Williams, Lorenz knots are prime. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 4 no. 1, 147–163 (1984).
L.S. Young, What are SRB measures, and which dynamical systems have them? . Dedicated to David Ruelle and Yasha Sinai on the occasion of their 65th birthdays. J. Statist. Phys. 108 no. 5–6, 733–754 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Basel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ghys, É. (2013). The Lorenz Attractor, a Paradigm for Chaos. In: Duplantier, B., Nonnenmacher, S., Rivasseau, V. (eds) Chaos. Progress in Mathematical Physics, vol 66. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0697-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0697-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-0696-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-0697-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)