Skip to main content

Research of the Correlation Between the Results of Detection the Liveliness of a Face and Its Identification by Facial Recognition Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Analytics in System Engineering (CoMeSySo 2023)

Abstract

In this paper, the hypothesis is investigated that a system capable of solving the problem of face-anti-spoofing with biometric authentication is capable of partially solving the recognition problem without additional recognition modules, by finding and excluding those persons who have a low probability of being successfully recognized. To do this, the paper considers the device of the basic facial recognition system, highlighting the role of the anti-spoofing module. Other approaches to face recognition and selection of images that do not contain faces have also been studied. The problem under study is formalized and presented in mathematical form for further experiments. During a series of experiments on selected data sets, the results were obtained and visualized, proving the absence of a relationship between the operation of the anti-spoofing module and the facial recognition module. In conclusion, plans for further work in this direction are also presented. #COMESYSO1120.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wang, M., Deng, W.: Deep face recognition: a survey. Neurocomputing 429, 215–244 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Firc, A., Malinka, K., Hanáček, P.: Deepfakes as a threat to a speaker and facial recognition: an overview of tools and attack vectors. Heliyon 9, e15090 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli-yon.2023.e15090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sivapriyan, R., Pavan, Kumar, N., Suresh, H.L.: Analysis of facial recognition techniques. In: Materials Today, Proceedings, vol. 57, pp. 2350–2354 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.296

  4. Hassani, A., Malik, H.: Securing facial recognition: the new spoofs and solutions. Biometric Technol. Today 2021, 5–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(21)00059-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, G., et al.: Silicone mask face anti–spoofing detection based on visual saliency and facial motion. Neurocomputing 458, 416–427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neu-com.2021.06.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng, W., Hu, J., Lu, J., Guo, J.: Transform–invariant PCA: a unified approach to fully automatic facealignment, representation, and recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. In-tell 36, 1275–1284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, X., et al.: Stable and compact face recognition via unlabeled data driven sparse repre-sentation–based classification. Signal Process. Image Commun. 111, 116889 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2022.116889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahonen, T., Hadid, A., Pietikainen, M.: Face description with local binary patterns: application to face recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 2037–2041 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2006.244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N., Zafeiriou, S.: ArcFace: additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition. In: IEEE/CVF Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4685–4694 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00482

  10. Liu, W., et al.: Sphereface: deep hypersphere embedding for face recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 212–220 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.713

  11. Wang, H., et al.: Cosface: large margin cosine loss for deep face recognition. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5265–5274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00552

  12. Wong, K.-W., et al.: A robust scheme for live detection of human faces in color images. Sign. Process. Image Commun. 18, 103–114 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-5965(02)00088-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, L., Ding, X., Fang, C.: Face live detection method based on physiological motion analysis. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 14, 685–690 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(09)70135-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shu, X., et al.: Face spoofing detection based on multi–scale color inversion dual–stream convolutional neural network. Expert Syst. Appl. 224, 119988 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pei, M., Yan, B., Hao, H., Zhao, M.: Person-specific face spoofing detection based on a siamese network. Pattern Recogn. 135, 109148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2022.109148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, H.–H., Yeh, C.–H.: Face anti–spoofing detection based on multi–scale image quality assessment. Image Vision Comput. 121, 104428 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ima-vis.2022.104428

  17. Chen, S., et al.: A simple and effective patch–based method for frame–level face anti–spoof-ing. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 171, 1–7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2023.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, S., Singh, S., Kumar, J.: A comparative study on face spoofing attacks. In: International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA), pp. 1104–1108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2017.8229961

  19. Boulkenafet, Z., Komulainen, J., Hadid A.: Face anti–spoofing based on color texture analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2636–2640 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351280

  20. Dear, M., Harrison, W.: The influence of visual distortion on face recognition. Cortex 146, 238–249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sandler, M., et al.: Mobilenetv2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4510–4520 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474

  22. Tan, X., et al.: Face liveness detection from a single image with sparse low rank bilinear discriminative model. Comput. Vis. ECCV 6316, 504–517 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15567-3_37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, Z., et al.: A face anti-spoofing database with diverse attacks. In: 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB), pp. 26–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB.2012.6199754

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergei A. Kesel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shnyrev, A.A. et al. (2024). Research of the Correlation Between the Results of Detection the Liveliness of a Face and Its Identification by Facial Recognition Systems. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P. (eds) Data Analytics in System Engineering. CoMeSySo 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 935. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54820-8_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics