Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Interoperability for Digital Twins

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2023 Workshops (EDOC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 498))

  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of Digital Twin (DT) has gained popularity as a digital representation of physical entities that interact with their real-world counterparts in (near) real-time through sensors and actuators. DTs can be applied across different sectors, offering benefits like simulation, remote monitoring, and predictive maintenance, which are relevant capabilities of smart systems. However, achieving the full potential of DTs requires addressing interoperability challenges posed by the complex networks of devices and systems that play different roles in DTs. This paper presents a research agenda aimed at enhancing DT interoperability grounded in four perspectives, which reflect knowledge fields in computer/information science, i.e., architecture of distributed systems, model-based system engineering, ontology-driven conceptual modeling, and linked data with semantic web. This paper highlights how leveraging on existing standards, such as modelling languages and ontologies, is important for improved DT interoperability. This becomes increasingly relevant for driving research directions related to ongoing initiatives such as the International Data Spaces and the Digital Product Passport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_2311.

  2. 2.

    https://www.opentripmodel.org/.

  3. 3.

    https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/.

  4. 4.

    https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/interoperable-europe.

  5. 5.

    https://www.omg.org/spec/SysML.

  6. 6.

    https://saref.etsi.org/core/v3.1.1/.

  7. 7.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/.

  8. 8.

    https://www.hl7.org/fhir/rdf.html.

  9. 9.

    https://www.fairdatapoint.org/.

  10. 10.

    https://rml.io/specs/rml/.

  11. 11.

    https://nemo-ufes.github.io/gufo/.

  12. 12.

    https://github.com/OntoUML/ontouml-models.

  13. 13.

    https://github.com/OntoUML/ontouml-vp-plugin.

  14. 14.

    https://saref.etsi.org/saref4ehaw/.

  15. 15.

    https://www.fiware.org/smart-data-models/.

  16. 16.

    https://unece.org/trade/uncefact/introducing-unedifact.

  17. 17.

    https://www.contact-software.com/.

References

  1. Pessoa, M.V.P., Pires, L.F., Moreira, J.L.R., Wu, C.: Model-based digital threads for socio-technical systems. In: Marques, G., Gonzalez-Briones, A., Molina Lopez, J.M. (eds.) Machine Learning for Smart Environments/Cities. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 121, pp. 27–52. Springer, Cham (2022). ISBN 978-3-030-97516-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97516-6_2

  2. Naderi, H., Shojaei, A.: Digital twinning of civil infrastructures: current state of model architectures, interoperability solutions, and future prospects. Autom. Constr. 149 (2023). ISSN 0926–5805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104785

  3. Böttjer, T., et al.: A review of unit level digital twin applications in the manufacturing industry. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 45, 162–189 (2023). ISSN 1755–5817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.06.011

  4. Jeddoub, I., Nys, G.A., Hajji, R., Billen, R.: Digital twins for cities: analyzing the gap between concepts and current implementations with a specific focus on data integration. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 122 (2023). ISSN 1569–8432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103440

  5. Walden, J., Steinbrecher, A., Marinkovic, M.: Digital product passports as enabler of the circular economy. Chem. Ing. Tech. 93(11), 1717–1727 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202100121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Firdausy, D.R., de Alencar Silva, P., van Sinderen, M., Iacob, M.E.: A data connector store for international data spaces. In: Sellami, M., Ceravolo, P., Reijers, H.A., Gaaloul, W., Panetto, H. (eds.) Cooperative Information Systems. CoopIS 2022. LNCS, vol. 13591, pp. 242–258. Springer, Cham (2022). ISBN 978-3-031-17834-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17834-4_14

  7. Wieringa, R.J.: The Design Cycle, pp. 27–34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2014). ISBN 978-3-662-43839-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_3

  8. Moreira, J., Pires, L.F., Van Sinderen, M., Daniele, L., Girod-Genet, M.: Saref4health: towards IoT standard-based ontology-driven cardiac e-health systems. Appl. Ontol. 15(3), 385–410 (2020). ISSN 1570–5838. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-200232

  9. Tuhaise, V.V., Tah, J.H.M., Abanda, F.H.: Technologies for digital twin applications in construction. Autom. Constr. 152, 104931 (2023). ISSN 0926–5805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104931

  10. Gaebel, J., Keller, J., Schneider, D., Lindenmeyer, A., Neumuth, T., Franke, S.: The digital twin: modular model-based approach to personalized medicine. Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 7(2), 223–226 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2021-2057

  11. Richardson, C.: Benefits and drawbacks of the microservice architecture. Manning Publications (2017). ISBN 978-1617294549

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Wimmer, M.: MDSE Principles. In: Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice. SLSE. Springer, Cham (2017). ISBN 978-3-031-02549-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02549-5_2

  13. Guizzardi, G., Botti Benevides, A., Fonseca, C.M., Porello, D., Almeida, J.P.A., Prince Sales, T.: UFO: unified foundational ontology. Appl. Ontol. 17(1), 167–210 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-210256

  14. Pfeiffer, J., Lehner, D., Wortmann, A., Wimmer, M.: Modeling capabilities of digital twin platforms - old wine in new bottles? J. Object Technol. 21(3), 3:1–14 (2022). ISSN 1660–1769. https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2022.21.3.a10. The 18th European Conference on Modelling Foundations and Applications (ECMFA 2022)

  15. Guizzardi, G.: Ontology, ontologies and the I of FAIR. Data Intell. 2(1–2), 181–191 (2020). ISSN 2641–435X. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00040

  16. Benhamed, O.M., et al.: The FAIR data point: interfaces and tooling. Data Intell. 5(1), 184–201 (2023). ISSN 2641–435X. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00161

  17. Sales, T.P., et al.: A fair catalog of ontology-driven conceptual models. Data Knowl. Eng. (2023). ISSN 0169–023X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2023.102210

  18. Moreira, J., Cordeiro, K., Campos, M.L., Borges, M.: Ontowarehousing – multidimensional design supported by a foundational ontology: a temporal perspective. In: Bellatreche, L., Mohania, M.K. (eds.) Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2014. LNCS, vol. 8646, pp. 35–44. Springer, Cham (2014). ISBN 978-3-319-10160-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10160-6_4

  19. Nakagawa, P.I., Pires, L.F., Moreira, J.L.R., Bonino da Silva Santos, L.O., Bukhsh, F.: Semantic description of explainable machine learning workflows for improving trust. Appl. Sci. 11(22) (2021). ISSN 2076–3417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210804. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10804

  20. Yadav, G., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Kumar, V., Batista, L.: A framework to achieve sustainability in manufacturing organisations of developing economies using industry 4.0 technologies’ enablers. Comput. Ind. (2020). ISSN 0166–3615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103280

  21. Barcelos, P.P.F., et al.: Inferring ontological categories of owl classes using foundational rules. In: 13th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2023) (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guizzardi, G., Guarino, N.: Semantics, ontology and explanation. CoRR, abs/2304.11124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11124

  23. Romanenko, E., Calvanese, D., Guizzardi, G.: Towards pragmatic explanations for domain ontologies. In: Corcho, O., Hollink, L., Kutz, O., Troquard, N., Ekaputra, F.J. (eds.) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. EKAW 2022. LNCS, vol. 13514, pp. 201–208. Springer, Cham (2022). ISBN 978-3-031-17105-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_15

  24. Almeida, J.P.A., Costa, P.D., Guizzardi, G.: Towards an ontology of scenes and situations. In: Rogova, G.L., Lebiere, C., Gundersen, O.E., Salfinger, A., Baclawski, K. (eds.), IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management, CogSIMA 2018, Boston, MA, USA, 11–14 June 2018, pp. 29–35. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423994

  25. de Souza, P.L., et al.: Ontology-driven IoT system for monitoring hypertension. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, pp. 757–767. INSTICC, SciTePress (2023). ISBN 978-989-758-648-4. https://doi.org/10.5220/0011989100003467

  26. Trojahn, C., Vieira, R., Schmidt, D., Pease, A., Guizzardi, G.: Foundational ontologies meet ontology matching: a survey. Semant. Web 13(4), 685–704 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-210447

  27. Azevedo, C.L., Iacob, M.E., Almeida, J.P.A., van Sinderen, M., Pires, L.F., Guizzardi, G.: Modeling resources and capabilities in enterprise architecture: a well-founded ontology-based proposal for archimate. Inf. Syst. 54, 235–262 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.04.008

  28. Amaral, G., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Porello, D.: Modeling trust in enterprise architecture: a pattern language for ArchiMate. In: Grabis, J., Bork, D. (eds.) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. PoEM 2020. LNBIP, vol. 400, pp. 73–89. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63479-7_6

  29. Oliveira, I., Sales, T.P., Almeida, J.P.A., Baratella, R., Fumagalli, M., Guizzardi, G.: Ontological analysis and redesign of security modeling in ArchiMate. In: Barn, B.S., Sandkuhl, K. (eds.) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. PoEM 2022. LNBIP, vol. 456, pp. 82–98. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21488-2_6

  30. Nardi, J.C., et al.: Service commitments and capabilities across the archimate architectural layers. In: 2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), pp. 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2016.7584386

  31. Griffo, C., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G., Nardi, J.C.: Service contract modeling in enterprise architecture: an ontology-based approach. Inf. Syst. 101, 101454 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.101454

  32. Saraiva, L., Silva, P., Castro, A., Ribeiro, C., Moreira, J.: Ontology of product provenance for value networks. In: Nurcan, S., Opdahl, A.L., Mouratidis, H., Tsohou, A. (eds.) Research Challenges in Information Science: Information Science and the Connected World. RCIS 2023. LNBIP, vol. 476, pp. 577–584. Springer, Cham (2023). ISBN 978-3-031-33080-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33080-3_40

  33. Celebi, R., et al.: Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the openpredict use case. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 6, e281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.281

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Twente - Semantics, Cybersecurity & Services (SCS) group, AE Enschede, 7500, Enschede, The Netherlands

    João Luiz Rebelo Moreira

Authors
  1. João Luiz Rebelo Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Luiz Rebelo Moreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Tiago Prince Sales

  2. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Sybren de Kinderen

  3. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria

    Henderik A. Proper

  4. Technical University of Munich, Heilbronn, Germany

    Luise Pufahl

  5. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Dimka Karastoyanova

  6. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Marten van Sinderen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rebelo Moreira, J.L. (2024). The Role of Interoperability for Digital Twins. In: Sales, T.P., de Kinderen, S., Proper, H.A., Pufahl, L., Karastoyanova, D., van Sinderen, M. (eds) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2023 Workshops . EDOC 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 498. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54712-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54712-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54711-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54712-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation