Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Augmented Reality on Visuospatial Abilities of Males and Females

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computing, Internet of Things and Data Analytics (ICCIDA 2023)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1145))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

Males and females inherently perceive cognitive load differently due to their biological make-up. Research indicates that males outperform females in spatial tasks. There is an increased demand for solutions to minimise the gap in visuospatial abilities between sexes. Augmented reality (AR) techniques offer a range of options to minimise the inter-sex gap in visuospatial perception and cognitive processes. However, research on the causes of cognitive differences between sexes in visuospatial tasks is obscure. Studies have shown that males have better reaction time and accuracy than females when performing spatial visualisation and orientation tasks with AR. There are no investigations on the factor of sex-specific differences that might impact user performance. Hence, this research focuses on inter-sex differences in perceptions of AR solutions and their effect on user reaction time and accuracy. The study employs an alternative research design with spatial AR – involving object-identification processing and spatial processing – to research the design criteria for AR solutions. The goal is to reduce participants’ cognitive load and reaction time and, ultimately, increase their performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abramov, I., Gordon, J., Feldman, O., Chavarga, A.: Sex & vision I: spatio-temporal resolution. Biol. Sex Dif. 3, 20 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2042-6410-3-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, A.M., Goldiez, B.F., Hancock, P.A.: Gender differences in navigation and wayfinding using mobile augmented reality. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meeting 49, 1868–1872 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504902111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchner, J., Buntins, K., Kerres, M.: The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: a systematic review. Comput. Assisted Learn. 38, 285–303 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A., Keller, T.A., Eddy, W., Thulborn, K.: Graded functional activation in the visuospatial system with the amount of task demand. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 9–24 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A.: Linguistic influences on picture scanning. In: Monty, R., Senders, J. (eds.) Eye Movements and Psychological Processes, pp. 459–472. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casey, M.B.: Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: a nature/nurture interactionist framework. Dev. Rev. 16, 241–260 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1996.0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Casey, M.B., Nuttall, R.L., Pezaris, E.: Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. J. Res. Math. Educ. 32, 28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/749620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherney, I.D.: Mom, let me play more computer games: they improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles 59, 776–786 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9498-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colby, C.L.: Spatial cognition. In: Squire, L.R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, pp. 165–171. Academic Press (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045046-9.01120-7

  10. Cutmore, T.R.H., Hine, T.J., Maberly, K.J., Langford, N.M., Hawgood, G.: Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 53, 223–249 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dietrich, T., et al.: Effects of blood estrogen level on cortical activation patterns during cognitive activation as measured by functional MRI. Neuroimage 13, 425–432 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dirin, A., Alamäki, A., Suomala, J.: Gender differences in perceptions of conventional video, virtual reality and augmented reality. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 13, 93–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i06.10487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dünser, A., Steinbügl, K., Kaufmann, H., Glück, J.: Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools. Presented at the CHINZ 2006: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand Chapter’s International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design Centered HCI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Durlach, N., et al.: Virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial behavior: towards a comprehensive research agenda. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 9, 593–615 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600300040402

  15. Eme, P.-E., Marquer, J.: Individual strategies in a spatial task and how they relate to aptitudes. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 14, 89–108 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goswami, A., Dutta, S.: Gender differences in technology usage—a literature review. OJBM 04, 51–59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2016.41006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou, L., Wang, X.: A study on the benefits of augmented reality in retaining working memory in assembly tasks: a focus on differences in gender. Autom. Constr. 32, 38–45 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Heinze, H.J., Peters, M., Jäncke, L.: Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks. Neuropsychologia 40, 2397–2408 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00076-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychol. Rev. 92, 137–172 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.2.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 441–480 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimura, D.: Are men’s and women’s brains really different? Can. Psychol./Psychologie canadienne 28, 133–147 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Linn, M.C., Petersen, A.C.: Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev. 56(138–151), 1479–1498 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayer, R.E., Fiorella, L.: Principles for reducing extraneous processing: coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 279–315. Cambridge University Press (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139547369.015

  24. Newcombe, N.S., Mathason, L., Terlecki, M.: Maximization of spatial competence: more important than finding the cause of sex differences. In: McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A.V., De Lisi, R. (eds.) Biology, Society, and Behavior: The Development of Sex Differences in Cognition, Greenwood, Westport, pp. 183–206 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newcombe, N.S.: Taking science seriously: straight thinking about spatial sex differences. In: Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M. (eds.) Why aren’t There More Women in Science: Top Researchers Debate the Evidence, pp. 69–77. American Psychological Association, Washington DC (2007). https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-006

  26. Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., Richardson, C.: A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test - different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn. 28, 39–58 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ro, H., Byun, J.-H., Park, Y.J., Lee, N.K., Han, T.-D.: AR pointer: advanced ray-casting interface using laser pointer metaphor for object manipulation in 3D augmented reality environment. Appl. Sci. 9, 3078 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaqiri, A., et al.: Sex-related differences in vision are heterogeneous. Sci. Rep. 8, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25298-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stancey, H., Turner, M.: Close women, distant men: line bisection reveals sex-dimorphic patterns of visuomotor performance in near and far space. Br. J. Psychol. 101, 293–309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609x463679

  30. Tagaris, G.A., Kim, S.-G., Strupp, J.P., Andersen, P., Uürbil, K., Georgopoulos, A.P.: Quantitative relations between parietal activation and performance in mental rotation. NeuroReport 7, 773–776 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199602290-00022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomsen, T., Hugdahl, K., Ersland, L., et al.: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in a mental rotation task. Med. Sci. Monit. 6, 1186–1196 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tsai, C.-H., Huang, J.-Y.: Augmented reality display based on user behavior. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 55, 171–181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Unterrainer, J., Wranek, U., Staffen, W., Gruber, T., Ladurner, G.: Lateralized cognitive visuospatial processing: is it primarily gender-related or due to quality of performance? Neuropsychobiology 41, 95–101 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1159/000026639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., Bryden, M.P.: Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol. Bull. 117, 250–270 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Voyer, D., Voyer, S.D., Saint-Aubin, J.: Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: a meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 307–334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Waller, D., Hunt, E., Knapp, D.: The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence 7, 129–143 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wolfe, J.M., Horowitz, T.S.: Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0058

  38. Yan, Z., Shan, Y., Li, Y., Yin, K., Li, X.: Gender differences of cognitive loads in augmented reality-based warehouse, pp. 500–501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/vrw52623.2021.00132

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland

    Julia Bend & Anssi Öörni

Authors
  1. Julia Bend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anssi Öörni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Bend .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ingenium Research Group; Campus Universitario, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain

    Fausto Pedro García Márquez

  2. National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Akhtar Jamil

  3. Ingenium Research Group, Campus Universitario, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain

    Isaac Segovia Ramirez

  4. Information Systems Engineering, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Türkiye

    Süleyman Eken

  5. Department of Computer Engineering, Istinye University, Istanbul, Türkiye

    Alaa Ali Hameed

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bend, J., Öörni, A. (2024). Effects of Augmented Reality on Visuospatial Abilities of Males and Females. In: García Márquez, F.P., Jamil, A., Ramirez, I.S., Eken, S., Hameed, A.A. (eds) Computing, Internet of Things and Data Analytics. ICCIDA 2023. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53717-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53717-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53716-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53717-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation