Abstract
In the concluding chapter, we address the critical question of what has changed and what has remained the same for the past 100 years since universal suffrage was adopted. Bringing together the findings provided in the individual chapters, here we discuss similarities and differences across time, especially in respect to gendered obstacles and feminist strategies for women’s political inclusion. This historical perspective enables us to see how women’s political inclusion is a multilayered concept; at different points in time, different aspects of women’s political inclusion has been brought to the fore and challenged; such as the formal right to vote, the right to stand for election, but also actual possibilities to exercise (different aspects of) these rights in practice. On the basis of these insights, we seek to develop the feminist institutional perspective on the conditions for gendered institutional change, by developing two analytical typologies: (1) on different types of gendered institutional constraints, and (2) on feminist institutional strategies used to counter them. Finally, we highlight the need to look beyond the category of gender and discuss the methodological contributions provided by a historical perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong, E. A. and Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1):74–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x.
Bergqvist, C., Bjarnegård, E. and Zetterberg, P. (2013). Analysing Failure, Understanding Success: A Research Strategy for Explaining Gender Equality Policy Adoption. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(4):280–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2013.855661.
Casson, M. C., Della Giusta, M. and Kambhampati, U. S. (2010). Formal and Informal Institutions and Development. World Development, 38(2):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.008.
Chappell, L. and Mackay, F. (2017). “What’s in a Name? Mapping the Terrain of Informal Institutions and Gender Politics”. In G. Waylen (Ed.), Gender and Informal Institutions (pp. 23–44). Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield International.
Diletti, M. (2022). Bringing the History Back into Social and Political Sciences. US Abroad–Journal of American History and Politics, 5(1):43–48. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-2752/14654.
Erikson, J. (2017). Criminalising the Client: Institutional Change, Gendered Ideas and Feminist Strategies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Erikson, J. (2019). Institutions, Gendered Perceptions, and Frames of Meaning: Explaining Strategic Choices of Women MPs in Swedish Prostitution Policy. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 40(2):263–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2019.1536599.
Freidenvall, L. (2021). Equal Representation Without Legislation: Gender, Power and Institutions in Sweden. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Gains, F. and Lowndes, V. (2014). How Is Institutional Formation Gendered, and Does It Make a Difference? A New Conceptual Framework and a Case Study of Police and Crime Commissioners in England and Wales. Politics & Gender, 10(4):524–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000403.
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4):725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472.
Hughes, M. M. (2011). Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women’s Political Representation Worldwide. American Political Science Review, 105(3):604–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000293.
Katz, E. D. (2021). Sex, Suffrage, and State Constitutional Law: Women’s Legal Right to Hold Public Office. 33 Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 110, Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 21-07-02. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3896499.
Krook, M. L. F. and Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism (Vol. 1). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lowndes, V. (2020). How Are Political Institutions Gendered? Political Studies, 68(3):543–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719867667.
Miller, S. (2019). “Social Institutions”. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/social-institutions/.
Murray, R. (2016). The Political Representation of Ethnic Minority Women in France. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(3):586–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv064.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5):1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.2307/1864376.
Scott, W. J. (1999). Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tosh, J. (2015). The Pursuit of History. Aims, Methods and New Directions in the Study of History. New York: Routledge.
Waylen, G. (2014). Informal Institutions, Institutional Change, and Gender Equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1):212–223. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23612047.
Waylen, G. (2017). Gender and Informal Institutions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erikson, J., Freidenvall, L. (2024). Conclusions: Theorising Gendered Institutional Constraints and Feminist Strategies for Institutional Change. In: Erikson, J., Freidenvall, L. (eds) Suffrage and Its Legacy in the Nordics and Beyond. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52359-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52359-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52358-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52359-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)