Skip to main content

The Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Plant Emergence Parameters for Wheat

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
15th International Congress on Agricultural Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture (ANKAgEng 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 458))

  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Conventional tillage; it is an application where most of the plant residues are buried or burned under the ground, and the plant residues on the soil surface are less than 15% after planting. With the environmental awareness that developed after the 1970s, alternative methods have been developed that minimize the field traffic and soil tillage without overturning it. In this method, which is defined as conservation tillage, the main criterion is that the field surface is covered with at least 30% plant residue. Reduced tillage forms the subgroup of conservation tillage. In this system, chisel or disc tools are generally used for primary tillage, harrow disc or cultivators are used for secondary tillage and seedbed preparation. In tillage application, no-tillage is done before planting after the previous crop harvest. Sowing is done directly on the previous crop stubble without seedbed preparation. In this research; no-tillage (direct seeder), reduced tillage (rototiller) and conventional (moldboard plow + disc harrow + roller) tillage methods were tested in terms of plant distribution and plant emergence uniformity. The mean emergence date, emergence rate index and percentage of emergence values were calculated for that. In the research, the best mean emergence time value was determined in the reduced tillage method with 15.18 days, the highest emergence rate index and percentage of emergence value were determined in the conventional tillage method with 20.7 plants/day m2 and 70.4%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barut ZB (2006) Ekim Makinaları, Ed. Serdar Öztekin Tarım Makinaları 2. Nobel Kitapevi. s.408, Adana

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barut ZB, Çelik İ (2009) Tillage effects on soil quality indicators in the semi- arid mediterranean coastal plain of Turkey. Philipp Agric Scientist 92(3):290–300

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choudhury SG et al (2014) Tillage and residue management effects on soil aggregation organic carbon dynamics and yield attribute in rice–wheat cropping system under reclaimed sodic soil. Soil Tillage Res 136:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ASABE (2013) Terminology for Soil Engaging Components for Conservation. ASABE Standards S477:364–369

    Google Scholar 

  5. Köller K (2003) Conservation tillage-technical, ecological and economic aspects. Koruyucu Toprak İşleme ve Doğrudan Ekim Çalıştayı İzmir. Ss.9–34:23–24

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hobbs PR, Gupta RK (2004) Problems and challenges of no-till farming for the rice–wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains in South Asia. Sustain Agric Int Rice-Wheat Syst

    Google Scholar 

  7. Özdemir S, Barut ZB (2022) Türkiye’de Şeritvari Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Uygulamalarının Durumu. Tarımsal Mekanizasyonlar ve Enerji Üzerine Güncel Araştırmalar. 2:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korucu T (2011) Anız Yakmaya Alternatif Çözüm: Korumalı Toprak İşleme. KSÜ Çiftçi Köşesi Web sayfası. http://www.gencziraat.com/Toprak-Bilgisi/Aniz-Yakmaya-Altarnatif-cozum-Korumali-Toprak-isleme-10.html

  9. Aykanat S, Karaağaç HA, Barut H, Sevilmiş U (2019) Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin Buğdayda Bazı Agronomik Özellikler Üzerine Etkisi. Uluslararası Doğu Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2(2):136–144

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karaağaç HA, Barut ZB (2007) İkinci Ürün Silajlık Mısır Tarımında Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Sistemlerinin Teknik ve Ekonomik Yönden Karşılaştırılması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Makineleri Anabilim Dalı Adana. 3(1):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bayhan Y (2015) İkinci ürün ayçiçeği tarımında doğrudan ekim olanaklarının araştırılması. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 12(1):110–118

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yalçın H et al (2010) Ege Bölgesi’nde buğday ve arpa üretiminde koruyucu toprak işleme ve doğrudan ekim sistemleri. Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi. 2:8–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marakoğlu T, Çarman K (2008) Buğday üretiminde azaltılmış toprak işleme ve direk ekim uygulamaları. Selcuk J Agric Food Sci 22:46

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barut ZB, Celik I (2010) Different tillage systems affect plant emergence, stand establishment and yield in wheat-corn rotation. Philipp Agric Scientist 93(4):392–398

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kassam A, Friedrich T (2012) An ecologically sustainable approach to agricultural production intensification: global perspectives and developments. J Field Actions Sci Rep Special Issue (6):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erbach DC (1982) Tillage for continue corn and Soybean rotation. Trans ASAE 25(4):906–911

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serkan Ozdemir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Barut, Z.B., Ozdemir, S. (2024). The Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Plant Emergence Parameters for Wheat. In: Cavallo, E., Auat Cheein, F., Marinello, F., Saçılık, K., Muthukumarappan, K., Abhilash, P.C. (eds) 15th International Congress on Agricultural Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture. ANKAgEng 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 458. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51579-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51579-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51578-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51579-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics