Skip to main content

Control Plane Comparison of OpenDayLight and Open Network Operating System Controllers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Asia Pacific Advanced Network (APANConf 2023)

Abstract

Software-Defined Networks (SDN) provide a new networking solution that decouples the control and data planes. The SDN controller as core component of the control plane manages and governs devices in the topology using the OpenFlow signalling protocol. The centralized construction of SDN leads to scalability issues. This paper analysis the number of switches impact on SDN controller performance. The performance metrics considered to measure the control plane quality of SDN controller are Topology Discovery Time (TDT) and Number of Overhead Messages (NOM). The paper focuses on two java based controllers which are OpenDaylight (ODL) and Open Network Operating System (ONOS). The simulation results show that increasing of openFlow switches number impacted on SDN performance of ODL and ONOS. However, the results show that ONOS outperform ODL in terms of performance metrics when the number of switches increases.

Supported by Misurata University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alatersh, F.M., Sati, S., Sullabi, M.: Impact of network topologies on RPL performance. In: 22nd International Arab Conference on Information Technology, ACIT 2021, Muscat, Oman, 21–23 December 2021, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alzarog, J., Almhishi, A., Alsunousi, A., Abulifa, T.A., Eltarjaman, W., Sati, S.O.: Pox controller evaluation based on tree topology for data centers. In: 2022 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI), pp. 67–71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDABI56818.2022.10041622

  3. Alzarog, J., Almhishi, A., Alsunousi, A., Elasaifer, A., Eltarjaman, W., Sati, S.O.: SDN controllers comparison based on network topology. In: 2022 Workshop on Microwave Theory and Techniques in Wireless Communications (MTTW), pp. 204–209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/MTTW56973.2022.9942565

  4. Badotra, S., Panda, S.N.: Evaluation and comparison of OpenDayLight and open networking operating system in software-defined networking. Clust. Comput. 23(2), 1281–1291 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berde, P., et al.: ONOS: towards an open, distributed SDN OS. In: Akella, A., Greenberg, A.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking, HotSDN 2014, Chicago, Illinois, USA, August 22, 2014, pp. 1–6. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhardwaj, S., Panda, S.N.: Performance evaluation using RYU SDN controller in software-defined networking environment. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 122(1), 701–723 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, X., Guo, D., Ma, W., He, L.: FloodSight: a visual-aided floodlight controller extension for SDN networks. In: Chen, Y., Christie, M., Tan, W. (eds.) SG 2015. LNCS, vol. 9317, pp. 75–86. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53838-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan, W., Yang, F.: Centralized trust-based in-band control for SDN control channel. IEEE Access 8, 4289–4300 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jmal, R., Fourati, L.C.: Implementing shortest path routing mechanism using OpenFlow POX controller. In: The International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications, ISNCC 2014, Hammamet, Tunisia, June 17–19, 2014, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumazoe, K., Shibata, M., Tsuru, M.: A P4 BMv2-based feasibility study on a dynamic in-band control channel for SDN. In: Barolli, L., Miwa, H. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems. INCoS 2022. LNNS, vol. 527. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14627-5_45

  11. Medved, J., Varga, R., Tkacik, A., Gray, K.: OpenDayLight: towards a model-driven SDN controller architecture. In: Proceeding of IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, WoWMoM 2014, Sydney, Australia, 19 June 2014, pp. 1–6. IEEE Computer Society (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Narisetty, R., et al.: OpenFlow configuration protocol: implementation for the of management plane. In: 2013 Second GENI Research and Educational Experiment Workshop, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 20–22 March 2013, pp. 66–67. IEEE Computer Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raza, A., Lee, S.: Gate switch selection for in-band controlling in software defined networking. IEEE Access 7, 5671–5681 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vengainathan, B., Basil, A., Tassinari, M., Manral, V., Banks, S.: Benchmarking methodology for software-defined networking (SDN) controller performance. RFC 8456, 1–64 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, N., Dong, C., Liu, L., Mian, W., Liang, B.: An SDN based highly reliable in-band control framework for LEO mega-constellations. In: 6th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems, ICCCS 2021, Chengdu, China, 23–26 April 2021, pp. 970–975. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, F., He, J., Wu, X.: First study on supply and demand network with multi-functional and opening characteristics for enterprise (SDN). In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics: The Hague, Netherlands, 10–13 October 2004, pp. 2108–2113. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yao, G., Bi, J., Xiao, P.: Source address validation solution with OpenFlow/NOX architecture. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 17–20 October 2011, pp. 7–12. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salem Omar Sati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sati, M., Emshiheet, M., Majouk, A., Sati, S.O. (2024). Control Plane Comparison of OpenDayLight and Open Network Operating System Controllers. In: Herath, D., Date, S., Jayasinghe, U., Narayanan, V., Ragel, R., Wang, J. (eds) Asia Pacific Advanced Network. APANConf 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1995. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51135-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51135-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51134-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51135-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics