Skip to main content

Nature of the Relationship Between the Brain and the Mind

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On the Origin and Nature of Cognition
  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

In spite of paradigmatic advances in cognitive science, there exists an unbridgeable gap between neurology and psychology. This can be directly traced back to Descartes. It is necessary to build a novel structural template to explain the relationship between the brain and the mind. In the accompanying chapters, a topological model of neuronal organization has been articulated. In this chapter, we deploy the same model to formally represent the relationship between the brain and the mind. The proposed topological model of the involuted manifold employs a higher dimensional manifold to represent the duality of the brain and the mind. Thus, this model explains why the Cartesian split must be treated as an artifact arising from the particular topological framework of the relationship between the brain and the mind. The human mind exists, even though we cannot have independent access to it. The modified operator of involution ensures that the mind has access to the information present in the brain without total reciprocity. This partial reciprocal information transfer between the brain and the mind also tells us why the computation paradigm of cognition is an inadequate template for cognitive science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M., 1992, “Intelligence and Development: Cognitive Theory.” John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axmacher, N., Rasch, B. (eds), 2017, “Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory Consolidation.” Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer, M., 2001, “Platonism and Anti Platonism in Mathematics.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, A. K., 2013, “Introduction To Programming Languages.” CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt, H. P., 1984, “The Lambda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics.” North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt, H. P., Dekkers, W., Statman, R., 2013, “Lambda Calculus With Types.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., 1989, “Quantum Theory.” Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldarelli, G., 2007, “Scale Free Networks: Complex Webs in Nature and Technology.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chhaya, P. N. [A], 2019, “The Universe Within: And A View From That Within.” Provisionally accepted, Universal Press, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhaya, P. N. [B], 2021a, “On The Origin and Nature of Mathematics.” Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhaya, P. N. [C], 2021b, “On The Origin and Nature of Spacetime.” Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhaya, P. N. [F], 2023, “The Computational Universe: In Search of A Universal Computation.” Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., 2007, “Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of A Classic Theory.” Sage Publications, Los Angeles.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, J., 2008, “Cartesian Reflections.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Decock, L., Horsten, L. (eds), 2000, “Quine: Naturalized Epistemology, Perceptual Knowledge and Ontology.” Rodopi Publications, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. J., 1979, “The Denotational Description of Programming Languages: An Introduction.” Springer, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., 2006, “The Measure of Man.” W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, Y., Amunts, K., 2006, “Broca’s Region.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, J. F., Holcomb, K. A., 2005, “Foundations of Modern Cosmology.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M., 2002, “The Essence of Truth: On Plato’s Parable of The Cave Allegory: Theaetetus.” Continuum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrlich, H., 2006, “Axiom of Choice.” Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P., 2014, “Compositional Semantics: An Introduction To Syntax/Semantics Interface.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kublik, S., Saboo, S., 2022, “GPT-3: Building Innovative NLP Products Using Large Language Models.” O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrios, M., Moulding, R., Doron, G., Bhar, S. S., Nedeljkovic, M., Mikulincer, M. (eds), 2016, “The Self In Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavitan, I. B., Kaczmarek, L. K., 1997, “The Neuron: Cell and Molecular Biology.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G., 2004, “One Hundred Years of Russell’s Paradox.” Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, P. 1990, “Realism in Mathematics.” Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F., Moses, L. J., Baldwin, D. A., 2001, “Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition.” MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I. L., 2010, “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. 10th Anniversary Edition.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrall, J., Currie, G., 1978, “Mathematics, Science and Epistemology: Philosophical Papers of Imre Lakatos. Volume 2.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portner, P., Partee, B. H. (eds), 2002, “Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings.” Blackwell Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle, F., Shiffrin, R. M., John Castellan, N., Pisoni, D. B. (eds), 2013, “Cognitive Theory. Volumes 1 and 2.” Psychology Press, Hove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller, R. 2008, “Some Aspects of Korsakoff-Wernicke’s Aphasia.” GRIN Verlag, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmer, J., 2019, “Synaesthesia.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smullyan, R. M., 1992, “Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swanston, M. T., Wade, N. J., 2013, “Visual Perception: An Introduction.” Psychology Press, Hove.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuti, G., Zaring, W. M., 2013, “Axiomatic Set Theory.” Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E., 1960, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in The Natural Science.” Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. (ed), 2008, “The Case For Qualia.” MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chhaya, P.J.N. (2024). Nature of the Relationship Between the Brain and the Mind. In: On the Origin and Nature of Cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51105-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics