Abstract
This paper is devoted to the study of the digital readiness of representatives of generation Z to interact with public authorities in the aspect of communication skills in the virtual space. This paper provides an overview of the concepts of “digital readiness” and “digital divide,” explores the various components of digital readiness, and analyzes the problem of digital readiness of young people for political participation. The study is based on empirical data obtained from a survey of various Generation Z cohorts (the eldest and the youngest) on topics such as the amount of time per day spent on the Internet, online communication style, the importance of approval of opinions and taking into account one’s own position in decision-making, the importance of likes, attitudes to anonymity on the Internet, trolling, extremist statements, violation of the moral boundaries of the interlocutor on the Internet, as well as themes of basic values and significant resources. Such a study was necessary not only to obtain factual data but also to study the dynamics of the transformation of the Internet communication style of Generation Z. As a result, the team of authors came to the conclusion that young people have a high level of digital readiness in the communicative aspect, but this readiness may vary depending on the skills, knowledge, and specific resources. In order to make it easier for developers of platforms for interaction between youth and public authorities to overcome communication barriers, the DIPENEM affordance model was proposed, which includes the affordances of discussion, perspectives, networking, and moderation. In conclusion, the results of the study are summarized and the prospects for further work are analyzed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Intel: Fully inclusive technologies and increased digital readiness. https://www.intel.ru/content/www/ru/ru/corporate/artificial-intelligence/ai-for-youth.html
OECD: Understanding the digital divide. https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf
Deloitte: The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2019. https://www2.deloitte.com/an/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/millennialsurvey2019.html
Pew Research Center: On the Cusp of adulthood and facing an uncertain future: what we know about Gen Z so far. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/05/14/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and-facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far-2/
Political indicators: Poll “FOMnibus” April 13–14, 2019. http://bd.fom.ru/pdf/d15pi2019.pdf
Tolstikova, I., Ignatjeva, O., Kondratenko, K., Pletnev, A.: Digital behaviour and personality traits of Generation Z in a global digitalization environment. In: Knowledge in the Information Society – Joint Conferences XII Communicative Strategies of the Information Society and XX Professional Culture of O. the Specialist of the Future, pp. 50–60 (2021)
Tolstikova, I., Ignatjeva, O., Kondratenko, K., Pletnev, A.: The specificity of the social capital of generation Z in the context of virtualization of the social construction of reality. In: Proceedings of International Conference “Internet and Modern Society” (IMS-2021), ITMO University, St. Petersburg, June 24–26 (2021). (in Russian)
Tolstikova, I., Ignatjeva, O., Kondratenko, K., Pletnev, A.: Gen Z blended learning: the technology of opportunity. Int. J. Open Inf. Technol. 9(12) (2021). https://doi.org/10.25559/INJOIT.2307-8162.09.202112.90-98
Brodovskaya, E., Huang, T.: Digital generation: civil mobilization and political protest of Russian youth. Public Opin. Monit.: Econ. Soc. Changes. 153(5), 3–18 (2019)
Trynov, D.: Youth political participation: support vs. protest. Sociodynamics. 12, 298–314 (2019)
Hamilton, J., Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S.: Teens and social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: staying socially connected while physically distant. PsyArXiv (2020, April 29). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5stx4
Koeze, E., Popper, N.: The virus changed the way we Internet. The New York Times (2020, April 7). www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/07/technology/coronavirus-internet-use.html
Granic, I., Morita, H., Scholten, H.: Young people’s digital interactions from a narrative identity perspective: implications for mental health and wellbeing. Psychol. Inq. 31(3), 258–270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820225
Wilson, S.: The Era of Antisocial Social Media. Harvard Business Review (2020) https://hbr.org/2020/02/the-era-of-antisocial-social-media
United nations e-government survey 2018. Earing e-government to support. Transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. http://www.tadviser.ru/images/a/a8/E-Government_Survey_2018_FINAL_for_web.pdf
Strategies for digital transformation of Russian regions. https://digital.gov.ru/uploaded/files/23082021150-95612sashin-avmincifry-rossii.pdf
Morozova, E., Plotichkina, N., Popova, K.: State as an agent of digital socialization. Bulletin of the Perm University. Polit. Sci. 13(2), 5–16 (2019)
Soldatova, G.U.: Digital socialization in the cultural-historical paradigm: a changing child in a changing world. Soc. Psychol. Soc. 9(3), 71–80 (2018)
Guzhavina, T.: Young people’s readiness to life in an age of digitalization. Territ. Dev. Issues. 8(4) (2020). https://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2020.4.54.4
Berger, P., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books (1966)
Castells, M.: The Power of Communication. HSE, Moscow (2020)
Borzel, T.: Organizing Babylon – on the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Adm. 76(2), 253–273 (1998)
The population of Russia by sex and age 2022 (as of 2021): statistics, distribution. http://www.statdata.ru/nasel_pol_vozr (in Russian)
Murzina, Y., Poznyakov, V.: Digital behavior and personal characteristics of Internet users. Soc. Econ. Psychol. 3(3), 6–21 (2018)
Acknowledgments
The study was conducted under support the “Center for Sociological and Internet Research at SPBU Science Park” resource center (the project No. 106-14771). This work was financially supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation, grant No. 19-18-00210 “Political ontology of digitalization: a study of the institutional foundations of digital formats of state governance.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tolstikova, I., Ignatjeva, O., Kondratenko, K., Pletnev, A. (2024). Digital Readiness of Young People to Interact with the State: Aspects of the Culture of Communication in the Virtual Space of Generation Z. In: Bolgov, R., Mukhamediev, R., Pereira, R., Mityagin, S. (eds) Digital Geography. IMS 2022. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50609-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50609-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50608-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50609-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)