Skip to main content

Algorithm for Mapping Layout Grids in User Interfaces: Automating the “Squint Test”

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Tools and Methods of Program Analysis (TMPA 2021)

Abstract

Human-Computer Interaction sees increased application of AI methods, particularly for testing and assessing the characteristics of graphic user interfaces (UIs). For instance, target users’ subjective perceptions of visual complexity, aesthetic impression, trust, etc. can be predicted to some extend based on UI appearance. Buttons, text blocks, images and other elements in today’s UIs at all platforms are usually aligned to grids – i.e. regular vertical and horizontal lines – in order to decrease visual clutter. However, the grids are not apparent in the UI representations available for analysis (HTML/CSS, etc.), unlike in design mockups, and have to be reverse-engineered for the benefit of further UI assessment. In our paper we propose the algorithm for automated construction of layout grids on top of visual representations (screenshots) of existing UIs and demonstrate its work with various configuration parameters. The algorithm was inspired by the informal Squint Test known from Usability Engineering practice and is based on subsequent application of several computer vision techniques supported by OpenCV library. The main stages are edge detection, image pixelization, grid overlaying, and cell coding. The tuning of the algorithm’s configuration parameters can be performed to match the UI perception by representative users, as demonstrated in the paper. The outcome of the algorithm is a coded representation of graphical UI as a 2D matrix, which is a convenient medium for further processing. The automation of UI layouts coding can allow obtaining large datasets needed by up-to-date user behavior models that predict the quality of interaction with UIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Machado, P., et al.: Computerized measures of visual complexity. Acta Physiol (Oxf.) 160, 43–57 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miniukovich, A., Marchese, M.: Relationship between visual complexity and aesthetics of webpages. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer System, pp. 1–13 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stickel, C., Ebner, M., Holzinger, A.: The XAOS metric–understanding visual complexity as measure of usability. In: Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, pp. 278–290 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. King, A.J., Lazard, A.J., White, S.R.: The influence of visual complexity on initial user impressions: testing the persuasive model of web design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 39(5), 497–510 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakaev, M., Avdeenko, T.: A quantitative measure for information transfer in human-machine control systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON), pp. 1–4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, O., Hu, W., Shi, L.: Measuring the visual complexities of web pages. ACM Trans. Web (TWEB) 7(1), 1 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michailidou, E., et al.: Automated prediction of visual complexity of web pages: tools and evaluations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 145, 102523 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Donderi, D.C.: Visual complexity: a review. Psychol. Bull. 132(1), 73 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bakaev, M. et al.: Data compression algorithms in analysis of UI layouts visual complexity. In: Proceedings of the International Andrei Ershov Memorial Conference on Perspectives of System Informatics, pp. 167–184 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thielsch, M.T., Haines, R., Flacke, L.: Experimental investigation on the effects of website aesthetics on user performance in different virtual tasks. PeerJ 7, e6516 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alemerien, K., Magel, K. GUIEvaluator: A metric-tool for evaluating the complexity of graphical user interfaces. In: SEKE, pp. 13–18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miniukovich, A., de Angeli, A.: Quantification of interface visual complexity. In: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 153–160 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oulasvirta, A. et al.: Aalto interface metrics (AIM) a service and codebase for computational GUI evaluation. In: Adjunct Proceedings 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 16–19 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, N.W., et al.: BubbleView: an interface for crowdsourcing image importance maps and tracking visual attention. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI), 24(5), 36 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boychuk, E., Bakaev, M.: Entropy and compression based analysis of web user interfaces. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE), pp. 253–261 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim Bakaev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bakaev, M., Shirokov, M. (2024). Algorithm for Mapping Layout Grids in User Interfaces: Automating the “Squint Test”. In: Yavorskiy, R., Cavalli, A.R., Kalenkova, A. (eds) Tools and Methods of Program Analysis. TMPA 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1559. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50423-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50423-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50422-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50423-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics