Skip to main content

Hydrogen Content and Charpy Toughness of Pipeline Steels with Different Hydrogen Charging Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
TMS 2024 153rd Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings (TMS 2024)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 942 Accesses

Abstract

Hydrogen embrittlement of pipeline steels has become a major design concern for the transportation of pure hydrogen gas or hydrogen blends using pipeline, especially at high design stresses. Quantification of the effects requires measurement of hydrogen content in test samples and suitable test controls to simulate the practical service conditions. In this work, the total hydrogen content in pipeline steels pre-charged using electrolytic and gaseous methods was measured using the inert gas fusion (LECO) analysis. The analysis results showed that an average of approximately 0.2 ppm hydrogen existed in the as-received X65 steel specimens without either electrolytic or gaseous hydrogen charging. The electrolytic pre-charging in 0.1 M NaOH solution with 150 mg/L As2O3 was effective to introduce hydrogen into the X65 steel, and the highest total hydrogen content of 1.4 ppm was achieved at a charging current density of 2.5 mA/cm2 and charging time of one hour. The highest total hydrogen content achieved by the gaseous charging technique in pure H2 at 10.3 MPa pressure at room temperature for 15 days was 0.4 ppm. Pd surface coating promoted hydrogen absorption into the steel and led to almost doubled total hydrogen contents for both charging techniques. Ex-situ Charpy tests of electrolytically pre-charged X65 specimens at room temperature showed approximately maximum 20% reduction in Charpy absorbed energy (CVN) compared to uncharged specimens. The discrepancy in the pre-charging time needed to reach the saturation effect (i.e., one hour for LECO vs. five hours for Charpy) can be attributed to the different sample geometry and dimensions for the LECO and Charpy tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/climate-change-adapting-impacts-and-reducing-emissions/canadas-green-future/the-hydrogen-strategy/23080

  2. ASTM E23-18 (2018) Standard test methods for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Escobar DP, Minambres C, Duprez L, Verbeken K, Verhaege M (2011) Internal and surface damage of multiphase steels and pure iron after electrochemical hydrogen charging. Corros Sci 53:3166–3176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vucko F, Bosch C, Aoufi A, Delafosse D (2014) Palladium coating on quenched-tempered martensitic steel for hydrogen electrochemical permeation tests. Research report # ENSMSE-SMS-2014-01, http://hal-emse.ccsd.cnrs.fr/emse-00951142v2

  5. (2018) CSA Z245.1-18, Steel pipe. Canadian Standards Association

    Google Scholar 

  6. (2018) API specification 5L, line pipe, 46th edn. American Petroleum Institute

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rudomilova D, Prosek T, Luckeneder G (2018) Techniques for investigation of hydrogen embrittlement of advanced high strenght steels. Corros Rev 36:413–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gangloff RP Somerday BP (eds) (2012) Gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of materials in energy technologies. In: Volume 2: Mechanisms, modelling and future developments. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evers S, Senoz C, Rohwerder M (2013) Hydrogen detection in metals: a review and introduction of a Kelvin probe approach. Sci Technol Adv Mater 14:014201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ha HM, Ai J-H, Scally JR (2014) Effects of prior cold work on hydrogen trapping and diffusion in API X-70 line pipe steel during electrochemical charging. Corrosion 70(2):166–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hultquist G, Graham MJ, Smialek JL, Jonsson B (2015) Hydrogen in metals studied by Thermal Desorption Spectroscopy (TDS). Corros Sci 93:324–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishikawa N, Shimamura J, Izumi D, Okano H, Nishihara Y (2022) Hydrogen effect on linepipe steel and material compatibility to a high-pressure hydrogen pipeline. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 32(4):448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Atrens A, Mezzanotte D, Fiore NF, Genshaw MA (1980) Electrochemical studies of hydrogen diffusion and permeability in Ni. Corros Sci 20(5):673–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Q, Atrens AD, Shi Z, Verbeken K, Atrens A (2014) Determination of the hydrogen fugacity during electrolytic charging of steel. Corros Sci 87:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Conrad H, Ertl G, Latta EE (1974) Adsorpton of hydrogen on palladium single crystal surfaces. Surf Sci 41:435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwarzer M, Hertl N, Nitz F, Borodin D, Fingerhut J, Kitsopoulos TN, Wodtke AM (2022) Adsorption and absorption energies of hydrogen with palladium. J Phys Chem C 126:14500–14508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu K (2012) Hydrogen embrittlement of carbon steels and their welds. In: Gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of materials in energy technologies, vol 1. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, pp 526–561

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Hydrogen Codes and Standards R&D program, Office of Energy Research and Development (OERD), and Natural Resource of Canada (NRCan) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to express their appreciation to David Saleh, Jie Liang, Magdalene Matchim, Chao Shi, and Renata Zavadil of CanmetMATERIALS, NRCan for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Pang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pang, X., Xu, S. (2024). Hydrogen Content and Charpy Toughness of Pipeline Steels with Different Hydrogen Charging Processes. In: TMS 2024 153rd Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. TMS 2024. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50349-8_112

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics