Abstract
Many teachers, learners, and parents are already immersed in countless digital technologies, including hardware (e.g. smartphones, tablets, augmented reality (AR) tools, virtual reality (VR) glasses, holography, etc.) and software (e.g. apps, online platforms, artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, etc.). Many of these technologies were not originally designed for educational purposes (e.g. holography, VR glasses, etc.), but most of them are gradually being applied in educational contexts. This raises several opportunities and challenges; for instance, it is a common assumption among teachers, learners, and parents that if digital technologies function efficiently in various other contexts, they should also be able to facilitate teaching and learning when implemented for educational purposes. However, the quality and suitability of integrating digital technologies into the field of education warrant further examination – the current enthusiasm outpaces the empirical evidence available in this area. Against this background, this chapter aims to provide an understanding of how transformative and innovative mathematics learning experiences could be facilitated by such resources, mainly in AR and AI which will be our focus area, while also presenting the main challenges. In particular, we propose some of the potential implementations of AR in mathematics education while also discussing how AI-based tools can enhance the teaching and learning experience in this subject. Inspired by cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT), we present a framework offering research-based principles for designing digital resources for effective learning with emerging technologies and highlight main challenges faced by various stakeholders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This section is developed from Li, (2023).
References
Abdullah, M. R. T. L., Hussin, Z., Asra, Z., & Zakaria, A. R. (2013). mLearning scaffolding model for undergraduate English language learning: Bridging formal and informal learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 217–233.
Apple. (2018). Augmented reality in education: Lesson ideas. Apple https://www.apple.com/uk/education/docs/ar-in-edu-lesson-ideas.pdf
Arvanitis, T. N., Petrou, A., Knight, J. F., Savas, S., Sotiriou, S., Gargalakos, M., & Gialouri, E. (2009). Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0187-7
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Barohny, E. (2019). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941
Bellas, F., Guerreiro-Santalla, S., Naya, M., & Duro, R. J. (2023). AI curriculum for European high schools: An embedded intelligence approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33, 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00315-0
Blayone, T. J. B. (2019). Theorising effective uses of digital technology with activity theory. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1645728
Bødker, S. (1990). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Routledge.
Bodrova, E., Leong, D. J., & Akhutina, T. V. (2011). When everything new is well-forgotten old: Vygotsky/Luria insights in the development of executive functions. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(133), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.301
Boston University. (n.d.). Social wellbeing. https://www.bu.edu/studentwellbeing/what-is-wellbeing/social-wellbeing/
Bronack, S. C. (2011). The role of immersive media in online education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2011.583186
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900000866
Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Ramaswamy, S., Chui, M., Allas, T., Dahlström, P., Henke, N., & Trench, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The next digital frontier? McKinsey Global Institute.
Cambridge Mathematics. (n.d.). Key terms in framework documentation. https://www.cambridgemaths.org/research/key-terms-in-framework-documentation/
Cambridge University Press. (2017). Artificial intelligence. In Cambridge academic content dictionary.
Carbonell Carrera, C., & Bermejo Asensio, L. A. (2017). Augmented reality as a digital teaching environment to develop spatial thinking. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1145556
Caridade, C. M. R. (2022). GeoGebra augmented reality: Ideas for teaching and learning math. In F. Yilmaz, A. Queiruga-Dios, M. J. Santos Sánchez, D. Rasteiro, V. Gayoso Martínez, & J. Martín Vaquero (Eds.), Mathematical methods for engineering applications. ICMASE 2021 (Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics) (Vol. 384, pp. 235–244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96401-6_22
Carr, M. (2000). Technological affordance, social practice and learning narratives in an early childhood setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008986002620
Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 505–528.
Cazden, C. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at home and at school (Papers and reports on child language development, No. 17, pp. 1–29). Stanford University, Department of Linguistics. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED191274
Chen, Y. C., Chi, H. L., Hung, W. H., & Kang, S. C. (2011). Use of tangible and augmented reality models in engineering graphics courses. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 137(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000078
Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A. M. DiBiase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 267–297). Routledge.
Clemmensen, T., Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2016). Making HCI theory work: An analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behaviour and Information Technology, 35(8), 608–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1175507
Craig, S. D., Hu, X., Graesser, A. C., Bargagliotti, A. E., Sterbinsky, A., Cheney, K. R., & Okwumabua, T. (2013). The impact of a technology-based mathematics after-school program using ALEKS on student’s knowledge and behaviors. Computers & Education, 68, 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.010
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. Routledge.
Department for Education. (2019). Realising the potential of technology in education: A strategy for education providers and the technology industry. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/realising-the-potential-of-technology-in-education
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology & Office for artificial intelligence. (2023). AI regulation: A pro-innovation approach. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-regulation-a-pro-innovation-approach
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation (CHAT technical reports #1). Centre for Human Activity Theory/Kansai University.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211–224). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.ch16
European Commission. (2021). Regulatory framework proposal on artificial intelligence. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
European Parliament. (2023, June 6). What is artificial intelligence and how is it used? https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20200827STO85804/what-is-artificial-intelligence-and-how-is-it-used
Firschein, O., Fischler, M. A., Coles, L. S., & Tenenbaum, J. M. (1973). Forecasting and assessing the impact of artificial intelligence on society. In IJCAI’73: Proceedings of the 3rd international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 105–120). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1624775.1624789
Foot, K. A. (2014). Cultural-historical activity theory: Exploring a theory to inform practice and research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(3), 329–347. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10911359.2013.831011
Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Chevalier, A., Griffiths, R.-R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P. C., & Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical capabilities of ChatGPT. arXiv:2301.13867.
Future of Life Institute. (2023, March 22). Pause giant AI experiments: An open letter. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/
Geary, D. C., Human-Computer Interaction Institute, & Educational Testing Service. (2021). Preparation for success in algebra: Exploring math education relationships by analyzing large data sets (EMERALDS). Student Achievement Partners. https://achievethecore.org/file/6020
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Griffin, T. A., Green, B. P., & Welie, J. V. M. (2023). The ethical agency of AI developers. AI and Ethics, 2023, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00256-3
Hasan, H., & Kazlauskas, A. (2014). Activity theory: Who is doing what, why and how. In H. Hasan (Ed.), Being practical with theory: A window into business research (pp. 9–14). University of Wollongong. https://ro.uow.edu.au/buspapers/403
Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Educational technology: The influence of theory. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2002(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.5334/2002-6
Jacobs, G., & Asokan, N. (1999). Towards a comprehensive theory of social development. In Human choice. World Academy of Art & Science.
Jeon, J., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2022). Enhancing EFL pre-service teachers’ affordance noticing and utilizing with the synthesis of qualitative evidence strategies: An exploratory study of a customizable virtual environment platform. Computers & Education, 190, 104620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104620
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2009). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.
Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4
Klopfer, E., & Sheldon, J. (2010). Augmenting your own reality: Student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New Directions for Youth Development, 2010(128), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.378
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives – The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228.
Kounlaxay, K., Shim, Y., Kang, S. J., Kwak, H. Y., & Kim, S. K. (2021). Learning media on mathematical education based on augmented reality. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS), 15(3), 1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2021.03.011
Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007
Krouska, A., Troussas, C., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2022). Mobile game-based learning as a solution in COVID-19 era: Modeling the pedagogical affordance and student interactions. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10672-3
Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Adoption of virtual and augmented reality for mathematics education: A scoping review. IEEE Access, 10, 13693–13703. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3145991
Lainema, K., Syynimaa, K., Lainema, T., & Hämäläinen, R. (2021). Organizing for collaboration in simulation-based environments: An affordance perspective. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1962451
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2014). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning (pp. 141–158). Routledge.
Lee, W. H., & Lee, H. K. (2016). The usability attributes and evaluation measurements of mobile media AR (augmented reality). Cogent Arts & Humanities, 3(1), 1241171. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1241171
Leont´ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.
Li, X. (2023). Transformative implications and evidence-based principles for creating content for mathematics learning in the metaverse. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on education and new learning technologies, EDULEARN 23 (pp. 1994–2003). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2023.0602.
Li, X., & Taber, K. S. (2022). The future of interaction: Augmented reality, holography and artificial intelligence in early childhood science education. In M. Kalogiannakis & S. Papadakis (Eds.), STEM, robotics, Mobile apps in early childhood and primary education (pp. 415–442). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0568-1_18
Lievens, J., & Van Daele, T. (2015). Touch teach learn. Unlocking the potential of touch enabled mobile devices for higher education. In 9th International technology, education and development conference (INTED) proceedings (pp. 5298–5304). IATED.
Major, L., Smørdal, O., Warwick, P., Rasmussen, I., Cook, V., & Vrikki, M. (2022). Investigating digital technology’s role in supporting classroom dialogue: Integrating enacted affordance into analysis across a complex dataset. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2032632
Manolova, M., Sheombar, H., & Surana, J. (Eds.) (2023). The digital compact consultation. Digital literacy: The great divide. UN. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/GDC-submission_Digital-National-Alliance-Bulgaria.pdf.
McIntyre, R. (2017, September 17). Learn from failures to boost your self-confidence. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/learn-from-failures-boost-your-self-confidence-ron-mcintyre.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters.
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Proceedings of SPIE: Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies (Vol. 2351, pp. 282–292).
Minsky, M. (Ed.). (1968). Semantic information processing. MIT Press.
Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf.
Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022). Blueprint for an AI bill of rights. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
Oliver, M. (2013). Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01283.x
OpenAI. (2023a). GPT-4 (June 21 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/
OpenAI. (2023b). ChatGPT (September 29 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/
Park, S., & Kim, S. (2021). Leaderboard design principles to enhance learning and motivation in a gamified educational environment: Development study. JMIR Serious Games, 9(2), e14746. https://doi.org/10.2196/14746
Park, J., Kim, S., Kim, A., & Mun, Y. Y. (2019). Learning to be better at the game: Performance vs. completion contingent reward for game-based learning. Computers & Education, 139, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.016
Perset, K., Nishigata, N., & Carblanc, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence in society: Phase 1. Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation Committee on Digital Economy Policy. OECD.
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596
Pucillo, F., & Cascini, G. (2014). A framework for user experience, needs and affordances. Design Studies, 35(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.001
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1
PWC. (2017). Bot.Me: A revolutionary partnership. How AI is pushing man and machine closer together. https://www.pwc.com/it/it/publications/assets/docs/PwC_botme-booklet.pdf
Rober, M. (2019). The super Mario effect: Tricking your brain into learning more. TEDxPenn. https://ted.com/talks/mark_rober_the_super_mario_effect_tricking_your_brain_into_learning_more?language=en.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, M., & Stahl, B. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: Clarifying their content and normative implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2019-0138
Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ChatGPT-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_EN_FINAL.pdf
Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence. (2023). National artificial intelligence research and development strategic plan: 2023 update. National Science and Technology Council. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/National-Artificial-Intelligence-Research-and-Development-Strategic-Plan-2023-Update.pdf
Shakarian, P., Koyyalamudi, A., Ngu, N., & Mareedu, L. (2023). An independent evaluation of ChatGPT on mathematical word problems (MWP). In A. Martin, K. Hinkelmann, H.-G. Fill, A. Gerber, D. Lenat, R. Stolle, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), Proceedings of the AAAI 2023 spring symposium on challenges requiring the combination of machine learning and knowledge engineering (AAAI-MAKE 2023). AAAI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13814
Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820600996972
Shute, R., & Miksad, J. (1997). Computer assisted instruction and cognitive development in preschoolers. Child Study Journal, 27(3), 237–253. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ554378
Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers and Education, 79, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013
Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: Augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2008.012
Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-006-9037-Z
Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
Taber, K. S. (2018). Scaffolding learning: Principles for effective teaching and the design of classroom resources. In M. Abend (Ed.), Effective teaching and learning: Perspectives, strategies and implementation (pp. 1–43). Nova Science Publishers.
Taber, K. S. (2020). Mediated learning leading development – The social development theory of lev Vygotsky. In B. Akpan & T. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 277–291). Springer.
Taber, K. S., & Brock, R. (2018). A study to explore the potential of designing teaching activities to scaffold learning: Understanding circular motion. In M. Abend (Ed.), Effective teaching and learning: Perspectives, strategies and implementation (pp. 45–85). Nova Science Publishers.
Taber, K. S., & Li, X. (2021). The vicarious and the virtual: A Vygotskian perspective on digital learning resources as tools for scaffolding conceptual development. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 143). Nova Science Publishers.
Thorpe, M. (2002). From independent learning to collaborative learning. In M. R. Lea & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed learning (pp. 131–151). Routledge.
Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800032000038822
Tu, Y. C., Tempero, E., & Thomborson, C. (2016). An experiment on the impact of transparency on the effectiveness of requirements documents. Empirical Software Engineering, 21, 1035–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9374-8
Tyson, M. M., & Sauers, N. J. (2021). School leaders' adoption and implementation of artificial intelligence. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2020-0221
UNESCO. (2022). K-12 AI curricula. A mapping of government-endorsed AI curricula. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380602
UNESCO. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics.
Uz-Bilgin, C., & Thompson, M. (2022). Processing presence: How users develop spatial presence through an immersive virtual reality game. Virtual Reality, 26(2), 649–658. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10055-021-00528-z
van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). Equinox.
Verenikina, I. (2010). Vygotsky in twenty-first-century research. In Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. AACE. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/35264/
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wong, W. H., & Kindarji, V. (2023, March 11). Digital literacy will be key in a world transformed by AI. The Global and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-digital-literacy-will-be-key-in-a-world-transformed-by-ai/.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9034-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, X., Zaki, R. (2024). Harnessing the Power of Digital Resources in Mathematics Education: The Potential of Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence. In: Papadakis, S. (eds) IoT, AI, and ICT for Educational Applications. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50139-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50139-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50138-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50139-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)