Abstract
Algorithm aversion, characterized by the tendency to distrust algorithmic advice despite its demonstrated superior or identical performance, has become an increasingly concerning issue as it reduces the practical utility of algorithms. To gain insights into this phenomenon, our research centers on individual traits, specifically focusing on familiarity with algorithms and familiarity with the task at hand, and their connections with attitudes toward algorithms. We construct a causal model to delve into these relationships and assess how attitudes, in turn, impact algorithm aversion. Our analysis draws upon data collected through an online survey involving 160 participants, and we employ PLS-SEM for our analysis. The results underscore a noteworthy positive correlation between familiarity with algorithms and attitudes toward algorithms. Interestingly, our findings indicate that familiarity with the task or domain knowledge does not significantly influence attitudes. Moreover, attitudes are demonstrated to have a negative impact on algorithm aversion. These discoveries hold significant implications for comprehending and addressing the issue of algorithm aversion. They shed light on the roles of individual traits and attitudes in shaping people's acceptance of algorithms, ultimately offering valuable insights for mitigating this phenomenon.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bailey, D., Faraj, S., Hinds, P., von Krogh, G., Leonardi, P.: Special issue of organization science: emerging technologies and organizing. Organ. Sci. 30(3), 642–646 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1299
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., Trichina, E.: Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 33, 1237–1266 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398
Dietvorst, B.J., Simmons, J.P., Massey, C.: Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 114–126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
Mahmud, H., Islam, A.K.M.N., Ahmed, S.I., Smolander, K.: What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 175, 121390 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121390
Filiz, I., René Judek, J., Lorenz, M., Spiwoks, M.: The Tragedy of Algorithm Aversion. Ostfalia Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Fakultät Wirtschaft (2021)
Fenneman, A., Sickmann, J., Pitz, T., Sanfey, A.G.: Two distinct and separable processes underlie individual differences in algorithm adherence: differences in predictions and differences in trust thresholds. PLOS ONE 16, e0247084 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247084
Kawaguchi, K.: When will workers follow an algorithm? a field experiment with a retail business. Manag. Sci. 67, 1670–1695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3599
Whitecotton, S.M.: The effects of experience and a decision aid on the slope, scatter, and bias of earnings forecasts. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 66, 111–121 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/OBHD.1996.0042
Allen, R.T., Choudhury, P.: Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: the countervailing forces of ability and aversion. Organ. Sci. 33, 149–169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1554
Logg, J.M., Minson, J.A., Moore, D.A.: Algorithm appreciation: people prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 151, 90–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Hilosophy Rhetor. 10, 130–132 (1977)
Wesche, J.S., Langer, M., Sonderegger, A., Landers, R.N.: Editorial to the virtual special issue: human-automation interaction in the workplace: a broadened scope of paradigms. Comput. Human Behav. 134, 107335 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107335
Mahmud, H., Islam, A.K.M.N., Mitra, R.K., Hasan, A.R.: The impact of functional and psychological barriers on algorithm aversion – an IRT perspective. In: Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Gupta, S., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.O. (eds.) The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World: 21st IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2022, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, September 13–14, 2022, Proceedings, pp. 95–108. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_8
Mahmud, H., Islam, A.K.M.N., Mitra, R.K.: What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 193, 122641 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122641
Gefen, D.: E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28, 725–737 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9
Komiak, S.Y.X., Benbasat, I.: The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30, 941–960 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148760
Sun, S., Wang, Y.: Familiarity, beliefs, attitudes, and consumer responses toward online advertising in China and the United States. J. Glob. Mark. 23, 127–138 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/08911761003673454
Chen, J., Dibb, S.: Consumer trust in the online retail context: exploring the antecedents and consequences. Psychol. Mark. 27, 323–346 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.20334
Husin, M.M., Aziz, S., Bhatti, T.: The impact of brand familiarity, perceived trust and attitude on investors’ decision-making in Islamic stock market. J. Islam. Mark. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2020-0093/FULL/HTML
Dawar, N., Lei, J.: Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. J. Bus. Res. 62, 509–516 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2008.02.001
Sharan, N.N., Romano, D.M.: The effects of personality and locus of control on trust in humans versus artificial intelligence. Heliyon. 6, e04572 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2020.E04572
Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J.S., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Understanding managers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making. Technovation 106, 102312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2021.102312
Berger, B., Adam, M., Rühr, A., Benlian, A.: Watch me improve—algorithm aversion and demonstrating the ability to learn. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63, 55–68 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00678-5
Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., Qu, Z.: Frontiers: machines vs. humans: the impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Mark. Sci. 38, 913–1084, ii–ii (2019). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1192
Gogoll, J., Uhl, M.: Rage against the machine: automation in the moral domain. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 74, 97–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCEC.2018.04.003
Prahl, A., Swol, L.V.: Out with the humans, in with the machines?: investigating the behavioral and psychological effects of replacing human advisors with a machine. Hum.-Mach. Commun. 2, 209–234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.2.11
Duan, Y., Edwards, J.S., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data – evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 48, 63–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2019.01.021
Breward, M., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Understanding consumers’ attitudes toward controversial information technologies: a contextualization approach. Inf. Syst. Res. 28, 760–774 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0706
Chau, P.Y.K., Lai, V.S.K.: An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 13, 123–145 (2003)
Morris, M.G., Venkatesh, V.: Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Pers. Psychol. 53, 375–403 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-6570.2000.TB00206.X
Whelan, E., Islam, A.K.M.N., Brooks, S.: Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance. Comput. Educ. 143, 103692 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.103692
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R.: The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol. Stud. 2, 285–309 (1995)
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19, 139–152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks (2017)
Kock, N.: One-tailed or two-tailed P values in PLS-SEM? Int. J. E-Collab. 11, 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEC.2015040101
Gefen, D., Straub, D., Gefen, D., Straub, D.: A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16, 91–109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01605
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32, 407–424 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OMEGA.2004.01.006
Copeland, L., Bhaduri, G.: Consumer relationship with pro-environmental apparel brands: effect of knowledge, skepticism and brand familiarity. J. Prod. Brand. Manag. 29, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2018-1794/FULL/HTML
Sieck, W.R., Arkes, H.R.: The recalcitrance of overconfidence and its contribution to decision aid neglect. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 18, 29–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/BDM.486
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mahmud, H., Islam, N. (2023). The Role of Algorithm and Task Familiarity in Algorithm Aversion: An Empirical Study. In: Janssen, M., et al. New Sustainable Horizons in Artificial Intelligence and Digital Solutions. I3E 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50040-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50040-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50039-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50040-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)