Abstract
The context of the health emergency caused by the Covid-19 pandemic led museums to adopt visitor management measures and interpretation techniques, which would lead to a closer relationship with the public and encourage visits. The heritage interpretation is more than transmitting information, and it is an educational activity, which can contribute to improve the visitor’s experience and to the sustainable development of local territories. The development and growing use of information technologies and multimedia techniques has boosted the use of digital media as a way of interpreting heritage. These techniques are crucial tools for museum management. However, digital interpretation is more than just a selection of technologies. It requires an integrated interpretive framework. This paper intends to understand how digital interpretation may be implemented in the scope of archeological heritage. In order to achieve the research objectives, besides a brief literature review, the Côa Valley Archeological Park and Museum is analyzed as a case study. This attraction was selected since the Côa Valley Archeological Park is classified as a UNESCO World Heritage Site and is an open-air gallery of Paleolithic carvings, which was born from the strength and perseverance of civil society, revolting against the construction of the dam in the Baixo Côa, and which became the main theme of the Côa Museum. The case study was analyzed through observation and an interview carried out with the representative of the Archeological Park under analysis. It was found that hard and soft strategies are being adopted for visitor management, and that various kinds of digital interpretation techniques are used, allowing great interactivity with the visitor. However, after the diagnosis, suggestions for improvement were proposed at this level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69–72.
Aldeias da Montanha. (2023). Descobrir e visitar Vila Nova de Foz Côa. Retrieved February 11, from http://aldeiasdemontanha.com/vila-nova-de-foz-coa
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
Ballart, J. (1997). El Patrimonio Histórico y Arquológico: Valor y Uso. Ariel Patrimonio.
Beck, L., & Cable, T. T. (2011). The gifts of interpretation: Fifteen guiding principles for interpreting nature and culture (3rd ed.). Sagamore Publishing.
Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.213a
Bradburne, J. M. (2019). Editorial. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2019.1560952
Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (1993). Interpretation and sustainable tourism: The potential and the pitfalls. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1(2), 71–80.
byAir. (2021). Museu do Côa. Retrieved August 10, from https://www.byar.pt/projecto/120-museu-do-coa/
Cáceres-Criado, I., Triviño-Tarradas, P., Valderrama-Zafra, J. M., & García-Molina, D. F. (2022). Digital preservation and virtual 3D reconstruction of “The Baker’s house” in the archaeological site of Torreparedones (Baena, Cordoba-Spain). Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 24.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2022.e00218
Çakar, K., & Aykol, S. (2021). Case study as a research method in hospitality and tourism research: A systematic literature review (1974–2020). Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520971281
Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6
Cassidy, B., Sim, G., Robinson, D. W., & Gandy, D. (2019). A virtual reality platform for analyzing remote archaeological sites. Interacting with Computers, 31(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz011
Chotrov, D., & Bachvarov, A. (2021). A flexible framework for web-based virtual reality presentation of cultural heritage. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2333(March), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0042542
Côa Parque. (2018). Plano Estratégico 2018–2022. Retrieved July 15, from https://arte-coa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Plano-Estrate%CC%81gico-2018-2022.pdf
Côa Parque. (2020a). O Côa—Museu. Retrieved July 15, from https://arte-coa.pt/museu/
Côa Parque. (2020b). Regulamento do Museu do Côa. Retrieved July 13, from https://arte-coa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Regulamento-do-Museu-do-Co%CC%82a.pdf
Côa Parque. (2020c). Visita ao Museu—Planear Visita. Retrieved August 10, from https://arte-coa.pt/visitas/visita-ao-museu/
Côa Parque. (2023). A Região—O Côa. Retrieved February 11, from https://arte-coa.pt/a-regiao-2/
Comissão Nacional da UNESCO. (2022). Côa e Siega Verde. Retrieved July 03, from https://unescoportugal.mne.gov.pt/pt/temas/proteger-o-nosso-patrimonio-e-promover-acriatividade/patrimonio-mundial-em-portugal/coa-e-siega-verde
De Ascaniis, S., & Cantoni, L. (2022). Handbook on heritage, sustainable tourism and digital media. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Fernandes, A. B., Pereira, P. D., Aubry, T., & Santos, A. T. (2021). “Qual é o teu legado?” A renovação digital do Museu do Côa como instrumento de aproximação às suas comunidades. In memoriam Bruno José Navarro Marça. In P. M. Homem (Ed.), Museus e Formação: Novas Competências para a Transformação Digital (pp. 58–83). FLUP/DCTP. https://doi.org/10.21747/978-989-9082-07-6/musa5
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
Gatelier, E., Ross, D., Phillips, L., & Suquet, J.-B. (2022). A business model innovation methodology for implementing digital interpretation experiences in European cultural heritage attractions. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 17(4), 391–408.
Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. Continuum.
Gonçalves, A., Costa, J., & Martins, P. (n.d). O Algarve: A Interpretação do Seu Património Arqueológico. Revista dos Algarves, 13, 14–20.
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies versus multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1064378/FULLTEXT01.pdf%20(10
Hancock, D., & Algozzine, B. (2011). Designing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers (2nd ed). Teachers College Press.
Haugstvedt, A. C., & Krogstie, J. (2012). Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Atlanta, GA, USA (pp. 247–255).
ICOMOS. (2008). ICOMOS_Interpretation_Charter_ENG_04_10_08.
Jung, T. H., & tom Dieck, M. C. (2017). Augmented reality, virtual reality and 3D printing for the co-creation of value for the visitor experience at cultural heritage places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 10(2), 140–151.https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-07-2016-0045
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Lercari, A., Shiferaw, N., & Forte, E. (2017). Immersive visualization and curation of archaeological heritage data: Çatalhöyük and the Dig@IT App P. UC Merced.https://doi.org/10.6075/J0CN71VP
Liarokapis, F., Voulodimos, A., Doulamis, N., & Doulamis, A. (Eds.). (2020). Visual computing for cultural heritage. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37191-3
Liu, Y. (2020). Evaluating visitor experience of digital interpretation and presentation technologies at cultural heritage sites: A case study of the old town, Zuoying. Built Heritage, 4(1), 14.
MacWhite, E. (1956). On the interpretation of archeological evidence in historical and sociological terms. American Anthropologist, 58(1), 3–25.
Magliacani, M., & Sorrentino, D. (2021). Reinterpreting museums’ intended experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Italian University Museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.1954984
Maietti, F., Medici, M., & Ferrari, F. (2021). From semantic-aware digital models to augmented reality applications for architectural heritage conservation and restoration. Disegnarecon, 14(26). https://doi.org/10.20365/disegnarecon.26.2021.17
Manuel, V., Bendicho, L.-M., & Grande, A. (2011). Hacia una Carta Internacional de Arqueología Virtual. El Borrador SEAV. http://www.londoncharter.org
McCrary, Q. (2011). The political nature of digital cultural heritage. LIBER Quarterly, 20(3–4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8000
Murta, S. M., & Goodey, B. (2002) Interpretação do Patrimônio para Visitantes: um quadro conceitual. In Murta, S. M., & Albano, C. (org.), Interpretar o patrimônio: um exercício do olhar. UFMG.
Noor, K. (2008). Case study: A strategic research methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602–1604.
Okanovic, V., Ivkovic-Kihic, I., Boskovic, D., Mijatovic, B., Prazina, I., Skaljo, E., & Rizvic, S. (2022). Interaction in eXtended reality applications for cultural heritage. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031241
Portugal-Patrimônios da Humanidade. (2018). Museu do Côa. Retrieved July 03, from: https://portugalpatrimonios.com/2018/05/31/museu-do-coa-2/
Puig, A., Rodríguez, I., Arcos, J. L., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., Cebrián, S., Bogdanovych, A., & Piqué, R. (2020). Lessons learned from supplementing archaeological museum exhibitions with virtual reality. Virtual Reality: The Journal of the Virtual Reality Society, 24(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00391-z
Reilly, P. (1990). Towards a virtual archaeology scenario analysis for strategic digital archaeological knowledge management view project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235902686
Rizvić, S. (2017). How to breathe life into cultural heritage 3D reconstructions. European Review, 25(1), 39–50.
Roche, D., & Quinn, B. (2017). Heritage sites and schoolchildren: Insights from the Battle of the Boyne. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(1), 7–20.
Samaroudi, M., Echavarria, K. R., & Perry, L. (2020). Heritage in lockdown: Digital provision of memory institutions in the UK and US of America during the COVID-19 pandemic. Museum Management and Curatorship, 35(4), 337– 361.
Silva, E. (2000). Património e Identidade. Os Desafios do Turismo Cultural. Antropológicas, 218–224.
Smith, T. A., Dunkley, R. A., & Jones, S. (2022). Storying wild landscapes: Multimodal interactions with digital app-based heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(7), 803–819.
Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013
Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage (3rd ed.). The University Of North Carolina Press.
Van Winkle, C. M., & Backman, K. (2011). Designing interpretive audio tours to enhance meaningful learning transfer at a historic site. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 6(1), 29–43.
Yin, R. K. (1994a). Case study research. Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (1994b). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage
Zafra De La Torre, N. (2017). El registro arqueológico como patrimonio histórico. Complutum, 28(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.5209/CMPL.58421
Acknowledgements
This work was financially support by the research unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policy (UIDB/04058/2020), funded by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dinis, G., Carneiro, M.J., Maiurro, M., Mota, M., Abrunhosa, R. (2024). Digital Interpretation as a Visitor Management Strategy: The Case of Côa Valley Archeological Park and Museum. In: Chica-Olmo, J., Vujičić, M., Castanho, R.A., Stankov, U., Martinelli, E. (eds) Sustainable Tourism, Culture and Heritage Promotion. CST 2022. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49536-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49536-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49535-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49536-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)