Abstract
There is a lack of clarity about how to augment the human in manufacturing. For practitioners, this creates challenges in understanding which technologies to invest in for specific automation goals, and where the value-add exists.
A narrative review of the literature is conducted through which the relationship between augmentation and automation is clarified. Definitions for Augmentation, and the Augmented Human, and a new Taxonomy of Human Augmentation are proposed.
Five classes of augmentation are identified: Physical, Collaborative Physical, Sensory, Embedded Intelligence, and Collaborative Social Intelligence. How the Taxonomy is applied to each goal of automation is illustrated. Finally the value-add of the classes is explored through industrial use cases, and the potential impact on manufacturing key performance indicators is summarised.
This novel Taxonomy of Human Augmentation unifies the existing research, and provides a common description of each class of augmentation, which can assist practitioners in seeking and exploring augmentation solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fitts, P.: Human Engineering for an Effective Air-navigation and Traffic-control. National Research, London (1951)
de Winter, J.C.F., Dodou, D.: Why the fitts list has persisted throughout the history of function allocation. Cogn. Technol. Work 16, 1–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0188-1
Licklider JCR: Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Trans Hum Factors Electron HFE-1, 4–11 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
Moencks, M., Roth, E., Bohné, T., et al.: Augmented Workforce Canvas: a management tool for guiding human-centric, value-driven human-technology integration in industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 163, 107803 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107803
Zolotová, I., Papcun, P., Kajáti, E., et al.: Smart and cognitive solutions for Operator 4.0: Laboratory H-CPPS case studies. Comput Ind Eng 139, 105471 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.032
Fässberg, T., Fasth, Å., Stahre, J.: A classification of carrier and content of information. Proc 4th CIRP Conf Assem Technol Syst 1–4 (2012)
Krugh, M., Mears, L.: A complementary cyber-human systems framework for industry 4.0 cyber-physical systems. Manuf. Lett. 15, 89–92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.01.003
Maettig, B., Foot, H.: Approach to improving training of human workers in industrial applications through the use of Intelligence Augmentation and Human-in-the-Loop. In: 2020 15th International Conference on Computer Science & Educ. (ICCSE). IEEE, pp. 283–288 (2020)
Kadir, B.A., Broberg, O., Conceição, C.S. da: Current research and future perspectives on human factors and ergonomics in Industry 4.0. Comput Ind Eng 137, 106004 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106004
Pfeiffer, S (2016) Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work. Societies 6:16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020016
Su, Q., Liu, L., Whitney, D.E.: A systematic study of the prediction model for operator-induced assembly defects based on assembly complexity factors. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. - Part A Syst. Hum. 40, 107–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2033030
Zheng, N., Liu, Z., Ren, P., et al.: Hybrid-augmented intelligence: collaboration and cognition. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. 18, 153–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1700053
Neumann, W.P., Winkelhaus, S., Grosse, E.H., Glock, C.H.: Industry 4.0 and the human factor – a systems framework and analysis methodology for successful development. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 233, 107992 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107992
Fantini, P., Pinzone, M., Taisch, M.: Placing the operator at the centre of Industry 4.0 design: modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, 105058 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.025
Romero, D., Bernus, P., Noran, O., et al.: The operator 4.0: human cyber-physical systems, adaptive automation towards human-automation symbiosis work systems. In: Advances in Production Man. Systems. Initiatives for a Sustainable World, pp. 677–686 (2016)
Davenport, T.H., Kirby, J.: Only humans need apply: winners and losers in the age of smart machines. Harper Business (2016)
Mattsson, S., Fast-Berglund, Ã…., Li, D., Thorvald, P.: Forming a cognitive automation strategy for operator 4.0 in complex assembly. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.011
Dolgui, A., Sgarbossa, F., Simonetto, M.: Design and management of assembly systems 4.0: systematic literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Res. 60, 184–210 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1990433
Dornelles, J.de A., Ayala, N.F., Frank, A.G.: Smart working in industry 4.0: how digital technologies enhance manufacturing workers’ activities. Comput. Ind. Eng. 163, 107804 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107804
Engelbart, D.C.: Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework (1962)
Raisamo, R., Rakkolainen, I., Majaranta, P., et al.: Human augmentation: past, present and future. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 131, 131–143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.008
Romero, D., Stahre, J., Wuest, T., et al.: Towards an operator 4.0 typology: a human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, pp 1–11 (2016)
Raisch, S., Krakowski, S.: Artificial intelligence and management: the automation–augmentation paradox. Acad. Manag. Rev. 46, 192–210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Davenport, T.H., Kirby, J.: Beyond Automation. Harv. Bus. Rev (2015)
Pirmagomedov, R., Koucheryavy, Y.: IoT technologies for augmented human: a survey. Internet of Things 14, 100120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100120
De Boeck, M., Vaes, K.: Structuring human augmentation within product design. Proc. Des. Soc. 1, 2731–2740 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.534
Lee, J., Kim, E., Yu, J., et al.: Holistic quantified self framework for augmented human, pp 188–201 (2018)
Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Padovano, A.: New perspectives and results for smart operators in industry 4.0: a human-centered approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 163, 107824 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107824
Cimini, C., Pirola, F., Pinto, R., Cavalieri, S.: A human-in-the-loop manufacturing control architecture for the next generation of production systems. J. Manuf. Syst. 54, 258–271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.01.002
Wandke, H.: Assistance in human–machine interaction: a conceptual framework and a proposal for a taxonomy. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 6, 129–155 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922042000295669
Thorvald, P., Fast Berglund, Ã…., Romero, D.: The Cognitive Operator 4.0 (2021)
Casla, P., Larreina, J., Fletcher, S., et al.: Human-centered factories from theory to industrial practice. Lessons learned and recommendations (2019)
Jiao, J., Zhou, F., Gebraeel, N.Z., Duffy, V.: Towards augmenting cyber-physical-human collaborative cognition for human-automation interaction in complex manufacturing and operational environments. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58, 5089–5111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1722324
Huber, J., Shilkrot, R., Maes, P., Nanayakkara, S.: Assistive augmentation (Cognitive Science and Technology), 1st ed. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6404-3
Maier, M., Ebrahimzadeh, A., Chowdhury, M.: The tactile internet: automation or augmentation of the human? IEEE Access 6, 41607–41618 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2861768
Garcia, M.A.R., Rojas, R., Gualtieri, L., et al.: A human-in-the-loop cyber-physical system for collaborative assembly in smart manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 81, 600–605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.162
Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Padovano, A.: Smart operators in industry 4.0: a human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Comput. Ind. Eng. 113, 144–159 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.016
European Factories of the Future Research Association: HuMan Project Tests Exoskeletons (2017). https://www.effra.eu/project-news/human-project-tests-exoskeletons. Accessed 1 Nov 2022
Al-Amin, M., Qin, R., Tao, W., et al.: Fusing and refining convolutional neural network models for assembly action recognition in smart manufacturing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 236, 2046–2059 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406220931547
A4blue (2016). https://a4blue.eu/. Accessed 1 Nov 2022
Winkelhaus, S., Zhang, M., Grosse, E.H., Glock, C.H.: Hybrid order picking: a simulation model of a joint manual and autonomous order picking system. Comput. Ind. Eng. 167, 107981 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.107981
Burresi, G., Lorusso, M., Graziani, L., et al.: Image-based defect detection in assembly line with machine learning. In: 2021 10th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), pp 1–5. IEEE (2021)
Knoch, S., Herbig, N., Ponpathirkoottam, S., et al.: Sensor-based human-process interaction in discrete manufacturing. J. Data Semant. 9, 21–37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-019-00109-z
Kristiansen, E., Nielsen, E.K., Hansen, L., Bourne, D.: A novel strategy for automatic error classification and error recovery for robotic assembly in flexible production. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 100, 863–877 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01248-3
Hancock, P.A., Jagacinski, R.J., Parasuraman, R., et al.: Human-automation interaction research. Ergon. Des. Q. Hum. Fact. Appl. 21, 9–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804613477099
Bicho, E., Erlhagen, W., Louro, L., et al.: A dynamic field approach to goal inference, error detection and anticipatory action selection in human-robot collaboration. New Front. Hum.-Robot Interact., 135–164 (2011)
Frohm, J., Lindström, V., Stahre, J., Winroth, M.: Levels of automation in manufacturing. Ergon. Int. J. Ergon. Hum. factors 30(3) (2008)
Draper, J.V.: Teleoperators for advanced manufacturing: applications and human factors challenges. Int. J. Hum. Fact. Manuf. 5, 53–85 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.4530050105
Fereidunian, A., Lehtonen, M., Lesani, H., et al.: Adaptive autonomy: smart cooperative cybernetic systems for more humane automation solutions. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE, pp 202–207 (2007)
Vagia, M., Transeth, A.A., Fjerdingen, S.A.: A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed? Appl. Ergon. 53, 190–202 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., Wickens, C.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 286–297 (2000)
Afroz, A.S., Inglese, F., Stefanini, C., Milazzo, M.: STL_Process: A .STL-based preprocessor for robot path planning in manufacturing and quality control processes. SoftwareX 15, 100725 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2021.100725
Mittal, S., Khan, M.A., Romero, D., Wuest, T.: A critical review of smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0 maturity models: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). J. Manuf. Syst. 49, 194–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005
Gürerk, Ö., Bohné, T.M., Alvarez Alonso, G.: Productivity and learning effects of head-mounted AR displays on human-centered work. SSRN Electron. J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3264118
Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A., Gawankar, S.A.: Sustainable industry 4.0 framework: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 117, 408–425 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009
Liu, Z., Wang, J.: Human-cyber-physical systems: concepts, challenges, and research opportunities. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. 21, 1535–1553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2000537
Zhang, M., Liu, W., Tang, X., et al.: Human-cyber-physical automata and their synthesis, pp. 36–41 (2022)
Cunningham, J.: Human and not too human. In: Dharamsi, K., Clemis, D. (eds.) Liberal Education: Analog Dreams in a Digital Age, pp. 61–84. Vernon Press, Delaware, United States (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41245-023-00169-x
Acknowledgment
This research is co-funded by the Enterprise Ireland and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Ireland’s European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI) Programmes 2014–2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Humphries, J., Van de Ven, P., Ryan, A. (2023). Augmenting the Human in Industry 4.0 to Add Value: A Taxonomy of Human Augmentation Approach. In: da Silva, H.P., Cipresso, P. (eds) Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications. CHIRA 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1996. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49425-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49425-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49424-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49425-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)