Skip to main content

Joint Coordination to Maintain Postural Balance Differs Between Preferred and Non-preferred Lower Limbs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
IX Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering and XXVIII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CLAIB 2022, CBEB 2022)

Abstract

The maintenance of postural balance depends on coordinated actions between the joints on both sides of the body. Although biomechanical modeling studies assume symmetry between the sides of the body in the control of postural balance, it is known that lateral preference makes the lower limbs functionally asymmetric in people without neurological impairment. However, it remains inconclusive whether the coordination between joint and segmental angles to maintain balance differs between the lower limbs according to lateral preference. The study investigated the coordination of joint and segmental angles for preferred (right) and non-preferred (left) lower limb movement for static and dynamic tasks during a single-legged postural task. Eighteen healthy young adults in single-legged upright posture were evaluated. The angular variability was assessed by analyzing the first eight principal components. The cross-correlation analysis between the main components and the angles examined showed that when the support on the ground was on the non-preferred lower limb, there was greater participation of the upper segments compared to the support of the preferred limb. The preferred support of the lower limb on the ground generated angular variability among the participants in the hip, knee, and ankle joints, that is, the most distal part of the body. There is a wide range of strategies for distributing the variability of the principal components between the original angles on the left side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Winter, D.A.: Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 3(4), 193–214 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maurer, C., Mergner, T., Peterka, R.J.: Multisensory control of human upright stance. Exp. Brain Res. 171(2), 231–250 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sainburg, R.L.: Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization. Front Psychol. 5, 1–14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sainburg, R.L.: Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 33(4), 206–213 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tseng, Y., Scholz, J.P., Schöner, G.: Goal-equivalent joint coordination in pointing: affect of vision and arm dominance. Mot. Control 6(2), 183–207 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elias, L.J., Bryden, M.P., Bulman-Fleming, M.B.: Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia 36(1), 37–43 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barut, C., Ozer, C.M., Sevinc, O., Gumus, M., Yunten, Z.: Relationships between hand and foot preferences. Int. J. Neurosci. 117(2), 177–185 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalaycgǒlu, C., Kara, C., Atbasoǧflu, C., Nalçaci, E.: Aspects of foot preference: differential relationships of skilled and unskilled foot movements with motor asymmetry. Laterality 13(2), 124–142 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paillard, T., Noé, F.: Does monopedal postural balance differ between the dominant leg and the non-dominant leg? A review. Hum. Mov. Sci. [Internet]. 74, 102686 (2020). Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102686

  10. Marcori, A.J., Okazaki, V.H.A.: A historical, systematic review of handedness origins. Laterality [Internet] 25(1), 87–108 (2020). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1614597

  11. Hoffman, M., Schrader, J., Applegate, T., Koceja, D.: Unilateral postural control of the functionally dominant and nondominant extremities of healthy subjects. J. Athl. Train. 33(4), 319–322 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, W.H., Liu, Y.F., Hsieh, C.C.C., Lee, A.J.Y.: Ankle eversion to inversion strength ratio and static balance control in the dominant and non-dominant limbs of young adults. J. Sci. Med. Sport 12(1), 42–49 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Teixeira, L.A., de Oliveira, D.L., Romano, R.G., Correa, S.C.: Leg preference and interlateral asymmetry of balance stability in soccer players. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 82(1), 21–27 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. King, A.C., Wang, Z.: Asymmetrical stabilization and mobilization exploited during static single leg stance and goal directed kicking. Hum. Mov. Sci. [Internet. 54, 182–190 (2017). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.004

  15. Huurnink, A., Fransz, D.P., Kingma, I., Hupperets, M.D.W., Van Dieën, J.H.: The effect of leg preference on postural stability in healthy athletes. J. Biomech. [Internet] 47(1), 308–312 (2014). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.002

  16. Promsri, A., Haid, T., Federolf, P.: How does lower limb dominance influence postural control movements during single leg stance? Hum. Mov. Sci. [Internet] 58, 165–174 (2018). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2018.02.003

  17. Promsri, A., Haid, T., Werner, I., Federolf, P.: Leg Dominance Refects on Postural Control When (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oldfield, R.C.: The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1), 97–113 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Daffertshofer, A., Lamoth, C.J.C., Meijer, O.G., Beek, P.J.: PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. 19, 415–428 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Federolf, P., Roos, L., Nigg, B.M.: Analysis of the multi-segmental postural movement strategies utilized in bipedal, tandem and one-leg stance as quantified by a principal component decomposition of marker coordinates. J. Biomech. [Internet] 46(15), 2626–2633 (2013). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.008

  21. Federolf, P.A.: A novel approach to study human posture control: “principal movements” obtained from a principal component analysis of kinematic marker data. J. Biomech. [Internet] 49(3), 364–370 (2016). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.030

  22. Mukaka, M.M.: Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med. J. [Internet] 24, 69–71 (2012). Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/mmj/article/view/81576

  23. Noé, F., García-Massó, X., Paillard, T.: Inter-joint coordination of posture on a seesaw device. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 34, 72–79 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoogvliet, P., Van Duyl, W.A., De Bakker, J.V., Mulder, P.G.H., Stam, H.J.: Variations in foot breadth: effect on aspects of postural control during one-leg stance. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78(3), 284–289 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, W., Santos, M.J., McIntire, K., Loudon, J., Goist-Foley, H., Horton, G.: Patterns of inter-joint coordination during a single-limb standing. Gait Posture [Internet] 36(3), 614–618. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.005

  26. Reimann, H., Schöner, G.: A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance. Biol. Cybern. 111(5–6), 389–403 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Latash, M.: There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance. Mot. Control 4(3), 259–260 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The present work was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel Brazil (CAPES). Financing code 88887.501802/2020-00.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. D. P. Rinaldin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rinaldin, C.D.P., Silva, V.A., Campos, D.P., Manffra, E.F. (2024). Joint Coordination to Maintain Postural Balance Differs Between Preferred and Non-preferred Lower Limbs. In: Marques, J.L.B., Rodrigues, C.R., Suzuki, D.O.H., Marino Neto, J., García Ojeda, R. (eds) IX Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering and XXVIII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CLAIB CBEB 2022 2022. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49407-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49407-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49406-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49407-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics