Skip to main content

‘3D Printed Breast Phantoms Materials for X-ray Imaging Techniques’

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
MEDICON’23 and CMBEBIH’23 (MEDICON 2023, CMBEBIH 2023)

Abstract

Physical breast phantoms are crucial for the development, evaluation, and optimization of X-ray breast imaging systems, such as mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and breast computed tomography. Traditional manufacturing methods can be time-consuming and lack precision. This study investigates the use of thermoplastic filaments and photopolymer resins as 3D printing materials for fabricating physical breast phantoms. The linear attenuation coefficients (μ) of these materials were determined to establish a standard attenuation coefficient graph for future research in X-ray imaging. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Stereolithography (SLA) techniques were employed for 3D printing, using eight different materials. X-ray imaging experiments were performed using a spectral photon-counting µCT-scanner. Preliminary results indicate a mismatch between theoretical and measured spectral attenuation profiles, a number of possible reasons are discussed. Future research will explore alternative equipment and techniques to address these differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boone, J.M.: Dedicated breast CT: the past, present, and future of breast imaging. Med. Phys. 44(8), e110–e123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glick, S.J.: Phantom studies and receiver operating characteristic analysis in nuclear medicine. Semin. Nucl. Med. 44(3), 179–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruschin, M., Mainprize, J.G., Mawdsley, G.E., Yaffe, M.J., Jong, R.A.: Design and characterization of a 3D anthropomorphic breast phantom. Med. Phys. 38(7), 4226–4231 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3595689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu, C.M., Palmeri, M.L., Rosenzweig, S.J.: Fabrication of a tissue-mimicking breast phantom for combined ultrasound, elastography, and MRI. Med. Phys. 40(6), 063501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4803391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, Z., Migler, K.B.: 3D printing of interdigitating PLA-PCL structures with tunable mechanical properties. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 298(1), 83–91 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201200213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Solomon, J., Samei, E.: Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE. Medical Physics, 41(9), 091908 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4893500.

  7. Glick, S.J., Ikejimba, L.C.: Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x‐ray imaging. Med. Phy. 45(10), e870-e885 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chong, A., Weinstein, S.P., McDonald, E.S., Conant, E.F.: Digital breast tomosynthesis: concepts and clinical practice. Radiology 292(1), 1 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kudelski, R., Cieslik, J., Kulpa, M., Dudek, P., Zagorski, K., & Rumin, R.: Comparison of cost, material and time usage in FDM and SLS 3D printing methods. In 2017 XIIIth international conference on perspective technologies and methods in MEMS design (MEMSTECH) (pp. 12–14). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ivanov, D., Bliznakova, K., Buliev, I., Popov, P., Mettivier, G., Russo, P., ... & Bliznakov, Z.: Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms. Phys. Med. Biol. 63(17), 175020 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malliori, A., Daskalaki, A., Dermitzakis, A., & Pallikarakis, N.: Development of physical breast phantoms for X-ray imaging employing 3D printing techniques. Open Med. Imag. J. 12(1) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. NIST Homepage. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/chap2.html, last accessed 2023/02/20

  13. Ballabriga, R., Alozy, J., Campbell, M., Frojdh, E., Heijne, E. H. M., Koenig, T., Llopart, X., Marchal, J., Pennicard, D., Poikela, T., Tlustos, L., Valerio, P., Wong, W., & Zuber, M.: Review of hybrid pixel detector readout ASICs for spectroscopic X-ray imaging. In Journal of Instrumentation (Vol. 11, Issue 1). Institute of Physics Publishing (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/01/P01007

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aris Dermitzakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dermitzakis, A., Pichotka, M., Petrai, A., Weigt, M., Pallikarakis, N. (2024). ‘3D Printed Breast Phantoms Materials for X-ray Imaging Techniques’. In: Badnjević, A., Gurbeta Pokvić, L. (eds) MEDICON’23 and CMBEBIH’23. MEDICON CMBEBIH 2023 2023. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 93. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49062-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49062-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49061-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49062-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics