Abstract
In this chapter, we explore the ultimate specific causes of the failure of the projects promoted by public actors, in particular town councils, within the framework of the LEADER neo-endogenous rural development programme. To this end, we analysed the project proposals presented by public bodies in each Local Action Group (LAG) area in Andalusia during the 2007–2013(+2) programming period, focusing on those in which the project was ultimately not carried out with LEADER funds and/or in which the project application was abandoned at some stage of the procedure. We began by analysing the regional government’s official internal database, created by the LAGs. This was followed by a series of semi-structured interviews. The results revealed the following: the official reasons for abandoning the project, opinions about the LEADER approach and the LAGs and the deep underlying causes for abandoning or withdrawing these initiatives. The complexity of the process is causing a regression in the essential principles of the LEADER approach, which makes public actors reluctant to participate, to such an extent that some see the LAGs as just another public body, as “inhibitors” rather than as “facilitators”. Unfortunately, the result is that half of the projects become little more than files which lie forgotten in drawers or heaps of paper. In addition, the role of these public actors appears to be limited to that of promoters and other types of involvement are difficult to discern. Our results also indicate that size matters. The villages with the smallest number of inhabitants often do not have the resources, technical personnel and capacity to carry out rural development projects. For their part, the provincial councils have played a largely irrelevant role as creators of initiatives or as providers of economic support for these small municipalities. It is therefore necessary to simplify the bureaucratic process, reduce the waiting time and advance payment of at least part of the grant.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Belliggiano, A., Sturla, A., Vassallo, M., & Viganò, L. (2020). Neo-endogenous rural development in favor of organic farming: two case studies from Italian fragile areas. European Countryside, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0001
Biczkowski, M. (2020). LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: The case of Poland. Miscellanea Geographica—Regional Studies on Development, 24(4)(4), 232–244
Bosworth, G., Price, L., Hakulinen, V., & Marango, S. (2020). Rural Social Innovation and Neo-endogenous Rural Development. In E. Cejudo & F. Navarro (Eds.), Neoendogenous development in european rural areas. Results and lessons (pp. 21–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33463-5_2
Bowden, A., & Liddle, J. (2018). Evolving public sector roles in the leadership of place-based partnerships: From controlling to influencing policy? Regional Studies, 52(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1346369
Cejudo-García, E., Navarro-Valverde, F., Cañete-Pérez, J. A., & Ruiz-Moya, N. (2021). The third sector: The “other” actors of rural development, Andalusia 2000–2015. Sustainability, 13(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413976
Cejudo-García, E., Navarro-Valverde, F., & Cañete-Pérez, J. A. (2022). Who decides and who invests? the role of the public, private and third sectors in rural development according to geographical contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015. Sustainability, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073853
Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemberton, S., & Woods, M. (2001). Partnerships, power, and scale in rural governance. Environment and Planning c: Government and Policy, 19(2), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12m
Fałkowski, J. (2013). Political accountability and governance in rural areas: Some evidence from the Pilot Programme LEADER+ in Poland. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.008
Furmankiewicz, M., Krolikowska, K., & Przybyła, K. (2020). Goals of elites and local communities in the European Union neo-endogenous development: differences as the constraints on Europeanisation? Hradec Economic Days, 10(1), 176–187. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12603/221
Furmankiewicz, M., & Macken-Walsh, Á. (2016). Government within governance? Polish rural development partnerships through the lens of functional representation. Journal of Rural Studies, 46, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.004
Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N., & Zielińska, M. (2010). Area-based partnerships in rural Poland: The post-accession experience. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001
Georgios, C., Nikolaos, N., & Michalis, P. (2021). Neo-endogenous rural development: A path toward reviving Rural Europe*. Rural Sociology, 86(4), 911–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12380
High, C., & Nemes, G. (2007). Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x
Konečný, O. (2019). The leader approach across the European Union: one method of rural development many forms of implementation. European Countryside, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0001
Marquardt, D., Möllers, J., & Buchenrieder, G. (2012). Social networks and rural development: LEADER in Romania. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(4), 398–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00571.x
Maurel, M. C. (2008). Local development stakeholders and the European model: Learning the LEADER approach in the new member states. Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 44(3), 511–529. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41132598
Munro, H. A. D., Roberts, M., & Skelcher, C. (2008). Partnership governance and democratic effectiveness: Community leaders and public managers as dual intermediaries. Public Policy and Administration, 23(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076707083286
Nordberg, K., Mariussen, Å., & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001
Olmedo, L., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2022). Community-based social enterprises as actors for neo-endogenous rural development: A multi-stakeholder approach. Rural Sociology, 87, 1191–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12462
Ray, C. (2000). The EU LEADER programme: rural development laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00138
Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. The Handbook of Rural Studies, 1, 278–291. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016
Shucksmith, M. (2010). Disintegrated rural development? neo-endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the following research projects: “Successes and failures in the practice of neo-endogenous rural development in the European Union (1991–2014). RURALWIN” funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness within its Excellence Programme, CSO2014-56 223-P; “Tackling depopulation and ageing in rural areas of Andalusia: challenges and opportunities” funded by the ERDF Operational Programme for the Andalusia Region 2014–2020, B-HUM-460-UGR20 and “Resiliencia de los espacios rurales ante la despoblación en la era COVID PID2021-128699NB-I00”.
We are most grateful for the invaluable support provided by the promoters, mainly local council employees, for their answers and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Navarro-Valverde, F.A., Ríos-Martín, M.J., Portillo-Robles, M.Á., Cañete-Pérez, J.A. (2024). The Difficult, Limited Involvement of Public Actors in the LEADER Programme. Initiatives Which Got Left Behind in the Rural Areas of Andalusia. In: Cejudo-García, E., Navarro-Valverde, F.A., Cañete-Pérez, J.A. (eds) Win or Lose in Rural Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48675-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48675-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48674-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48675-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)