Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reinvigorating Rural Values and Action—The Shift Towards New Perspectives on Rural Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Win or Lose in Rural Development

  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a synthesis of the increasing number of rural studies and policy assessment processes on rural development over the last decades. It focuses particularly on the implementation by EU Member States of the CAP since it first incorporated specific action on rural development. While highlighting the widespread concern amongst analysts and experts regarding balanced and sustainable territorial development, it assesses the limited success of the different policies and highlights the inherent failures of policy outlines, as manifested above all in the persistent “cleavages” between rural and urban areas. The main aim is therefore to explore the changes required in underlying policy narratives in order to reflect rural values and instigate rural action that seeks to identify and exploit the opportunities inherent in remote areas and place-specific natural assets. From this perspective, we also analyze ongoing discussions amongst research and policy actors in favour of a shift towards a long-term vision that departs from “business-as-usual” frameworks. Given the spatial diversity, legacy and institutional contexts, we believe that a fine geographical scale is of great importance and that local development will play an essential role in future transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Previous research collaboration and programme work on “rural research” issues included in that review cannot be repeated here for reasons of space. Among others, these include national research programmes or sub-programmes, SCAR reports and Foresight studies, comparative assessment studies (such as REAPER in the 1990s) and COST Actions (Rural Innovation) to instigate rural research, and literature reviews covering the main thematic journals and thematic analyses.

References

  • Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artaraz, K., Calestani, M., & Trueba, M. L. (2021). Introduction: Vivir bien/Buen vivir and post-neoliberal development paths in Latin America: scope, strategies, and the realities of implementation. Latin American Perspectives, 48(3), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211009461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, G., & Venhorst, V. (2018). Economic linkages between urban and rural regions—what’s in it for the rural? Regional Studies, 52(8), 1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1339868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryden, J. M., Efstratoglou, S., Ferenczi, T., Knickel, K., Johnson, T., Refsgaard, K., & Thomson, K. J. (Eds.). (2011). Towards sustainable rural regions in Europe: exploring inter-relationships between rural policies, farming, environment, demographics, regional economies and quality of life using system dynamics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203831403

  • Buch-Hansen, H., & Nesterova, I. (2023). Less and more: Conceptualising degrowth transformations. Ecological Economics, 205, 107731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckwell, A., Blom, J., Commins, P., Hervieu, B., Hofreither, M., von Meyer, H., Rabinowicz, E., Sotte, F., & Sumpsi Viñas, J. M. (1997). Towards a common agricultural and rural policy for Europe. Report of an Expert Group. European Commission. https://www.europeansources.info/record/towards-a-common-agricultural-and-rural-policy-for-europe/

  • Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copus, A., & Dax, T. (2010). Conceptual background and priorities of European rural development policy, deliverable 1.2, EU-project “assessing the impact of rural development policies” (RuDI), FP7—213034. 73. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.613.5207&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Copus, A., & de Lima, P. (2015). Territorial cohesion in rural Europe: The relational turn in rural development (p. 254). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F., & Kallis, G. (Eds.). (2015). DEGROWTH: A vocabulary for a new era. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dax, T. (2014). Shaping rural development research in Europe: Acknowledging the interrelationships between agriculture, regional and ecological development—An enhanced research strategy supported by the ERA-NET RURAGRI. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 116, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dax, T. (2015). The evolution of European Rural Policy. In A. Copus & P. de Lima (Eds.), Territorial cohesion in Rural Europe, The relational turn in rural development (pp. 35–52). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dax, T., & Copus, A. (2016). The future of rural development. In European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies (Ed.), Research for AGRI Committee—CAP Reform Post-2020—Challenges in Agriculture, Workshop Documentation, IP/B/AGRI/IC/2015-195 (Brussels: Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Agriculture and Rural Development, pp. 221–303). https://doi.org/10.2861/719222

  • Dax, T., & Copus, A. (2018). Towards vibrant, inclusive and sustainable rural regions: Orientations for a future rural cohesion policy. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 6(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dax, T., & Copus, A. (2022). European rural demographic strategies: Foreshadowing Post-lisbon rural development policy? World, 3(4), 938–956. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3040053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Souza, P. (2018). The rural and peripheral in regional development: An alternative perspective. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Toni, A., Di Martino, P., & Dax, T. (2021). Location matters. Are science and policy arenas facing the Inner Peripheries challenges in EU? Land Use Policy, 100, 105111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105111

  • Dwyer, J., Ward, N., Lowe, P., & Baldock, D. (2007). European rural development under the common agricultural policy’s ‘second pillar’: institutional conservatism and innovation. Regional Studies, 41(7), 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601142795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC—DG Agri. (2015). Research workshop on Empowerment of rural areas: A research agenda for Horizon 2020 [Workshop].

    Google Scholar 

  • EC—European Commission. (2022). Rural Pact. Proposals for conference on 15–16 June 2022. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-07/rural-pact-proposal_en.pdf

  • Ellis, F., & Biggs, S. (2001). Evolving themes in rural development 1950s–2000s. Development Policy Review, 19, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1988). The future of rural society. COM(88)501. Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 4/88. http://aei.pitt.edu/5214/1/5214.pdf

  • European Commission. (2021). A long-term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas—Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2021), 345 Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S., Lasen, M., & Tsey, K. (2014). A systematic search of trends in rural development research: Type of research, originating region and engagement with sustainability. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability: Annual Review, 9(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forum Synergies. (2022). Rural Europe Takes Action|No more business as usual. ARC2020, Brussels. https://www.arc2020.eu/search/Rural Europe Takes Action|No more business as usual/

  • Irwin, E. G., Isserman, A. M., Kilkenny, M., & Partridge, M. D. (2010). A century of research on rural development and regional issues. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(2), 522–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S., Loetscher, M., Gennaio, M. P., Dreger, F., Brouwer, F., Dax, T., Meredith, D., Dernfalk, J., & Ohlson, B. (2012). Strategic research agenda. Deliverable 3.2 of the ERA-NET RURAGRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knickel, K., Redman, M., Darnhofer, I., Ashkenazy, A., Calvão Chebach, T., Šūmane, S., Tisenkopfs, T., Zemeckis, R., Atkociuniene, V., Rivera, M., Strauss, A., Kristensen, L. S., Schiller, S., Koopmans, M. E., & Rogge, E. (2018). Between aspirations and reality: Making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, I., Dubois, A. & Teräs, J. (Eds.). (2019). Strategic approaches to regional development, smart experimentation in less-favoured regions. Series Regions and Cities. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhmonen, T. (2021). Summary report of the foresight analysis: Trends, dreams and assessments, D5.4 report. RURALIZATION H2020 Project “The Opening of Rural Areas to Renew Rural Generations, Jobs and Farms” (Grant No. 817642). Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Westlund, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P., & Brouwer, F. (2000). Agenda 2000: A wasted opportunity? In P. Lowe & F. Brower (Eds.), CAP regimes and the European countryside: Prospects for integration between agricultural, regional, and environmental policies (pp. 321–334). CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A., Shucksmith, M., & Brooks, E. (2022). The concept of spatial justice and the European Union’s territorial cohesion. European Planning Studies, 30(5), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Lamine, C., & Schneider, S. (2020). A research agenda for global rural development. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Martinelli, F., & Clifton, J. (2022). Rethinking spatial policy in an era of multiple crises. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, E. (2022). Development clusters for small places and rural development for territorial cohesion? Sustainability, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010084

  • Meredith, D., Arriaza, M., Salas Olmedo, M., & Dax, T. (2012). Identifying Priority Themes and Topics to be funded through the RURAGRI Research Call, Final report, Deliverables 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, ERA-Net RURAGRI (p. 129).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Cultivating rural amenities: An economic development perspective (p. 109). OECD Publications Service. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264173941-en

  • OECD. (2006a). The new rural paradigm: Policies and governance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264023918-en

  • OECD. (2006b). Coherence of agricultural and rural development policies. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). OECD principles on rural policy. www.oecd.org/rural/

  • OECD. (2022). Fostering agricultural and rural policy dialogue. Working party on agricultural policies and markets, working party on rural policy. OECD; Document COM/TAD/CA/APM/WP/CFE/RDPC/RUR(2022)1.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, M., Christmann, G., & Richter, R. (2023). Introduction. Dynamics of social innovations in rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2017). Uneven regional development. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. Goodchild, W. Liu, A. Kobayashi, & R. Marston (Eds.), The Wiley—AAG international encyclopedia of geography (pp. 1–13). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0721

  • Pipa, A. F., & Geismar, N. (2020). Reimagining rural policy: Organizing federal assistance to maximize rural prosperity. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Rural-Dev-Assistance-Brief.pdf

  • Scoones, I., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Wolford, W., & White, B. (2018). Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (Eds.). (2020). The politics of uncertainty: Challenges of transformation. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shucksmith, M., Brooks, E., & Madanipour, A. (2021). LEADER and spatial justice. Sociologia Ruralis, 61(2), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shucksmith, M., Brown, D. L., Shortall, S., Vergunst, J., & Warner, M. E. (2012). Rural transformations and rural policies in the US and UK. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slee, B., Lukesch, R., & Ravazzoli, E. (2022). Social innovation: The promise and the reality in marginalised rural areas in Europe. World, 3(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3020013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaney, J. (2015). Region and place II: Belonging. Progress in Human Geography, 39(4), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514539210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert, P., Tuana, N., Westskog, H., Koelle, B., & Afrika, A. (2016). TCHANGE: The role of values and visioning in transformation science. Sustainability Challenges, 20, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, J. D., Jingzhong, Y., & Schneider, S. (2012). Rural development through the construction of new, nested, markets: Comparative perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(1), 133–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.652619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visvizi, A., Lytras, M. D., & Mudri, G. (2019). Smart villages: Relevance, approaches, policymaking implications. In A. Visvizi, M. D. Lytras, & G. Mudri (Eds.), Smart villages in the EU and beyond (pp. 1–12). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-845-120191002

  • Willett, J. (2021). Affective assemblages and local economies. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://books.google.es/books?id=aJhFEAAAQBAJ

  • Wittmayer, J. M., Backhaus, J., Avelino, F., Pel, B., Strasser, T., Kunze, I., & Zuijderwijk, L. (2019). Narratives of change: How social innovation initiatives construct societal transformation. Futures, 112, 102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Institute of Agricultural Economics, Rural and Mountain Research (BAB), Vienna, Austria

    Thomas Dax & Ingrid Machold

Authors
  1. Thomas Dax
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingrid Machold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Dax .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Eugenio Cejudo-García

  2. University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Francisco Antonio Navarro-Valverde

  3. Department of Human Geography, University of Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain

    José Antonio Cañete-Pérez

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dax, T., Machold, I. (2024). Reinvigorating Rural Values and Action—The Shift Towards New Perspectives on Rural Development. In: Cejudo-García, E., Navarro-Valverde, F.A., Cañete-Pérez, J.A. (eds) Win or Lose in Rural Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48675-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation