Skip to main content

The Phenomenon of “Social Responsibility” as a Construct of the Humanitarian Educational Ecosystem for the Training of Future Engineers: Perspectives, Forms, Approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The World of Games: Technologies for Experimenting, Thinking, Learning (PCSF 2023)

Abstract

The paper considers the results of a preliminary study conducted among the first-year students (N = 106) enrolled in various technical educational programs at Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. The study was designed to achieve three goals. The first goal was to find out the growing role of the phenomenon of “social responsibility” in the changing situation of the ongoing industrial and digital revolution and its impact on humanity as a whole and on everyday life of everyone. The second goal was to find out the respondents’ opinions and interpretations of the phenomenon of “social responsibility’ and to compare the answers of Russian and American students to analyze whether there is any difference in understanding this social issue and whether they are ready to except this responsibility on the personal level. The data were obtained from the students’ answers to the questionnaire. In general, the study revealed a not very high level of understanding of the investigated phenomenon, but we observed some inconsistency in its understanding by Russian and American students, especially in personal responsibility. And the third goal was to develop some new approaches and forms that appear in the modern educational ecosystem, integrating humanities and technical components of higher education, considering gamification as one of the innovative tools to stimulate students’ active participation and transform their perception and practice of social responsibility. The new concept of future engineers’ social responsibility formation in the context of a humanitarian educational ecosystem opens additional opportunities in practical and theoretical areas of modern education, has a high social significance, since it allows conceptually and practically solving the issue of developing unified approaches to the implementation of social responsibility formation tasks, which is extremely important both for existing and for future generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Canney, N.E., Bielefeldt, A.R.: A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 1(30), 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sakellariou, N.: A framework for social justice in renewable energy engineering. In: Engineering Education for Social Justice, pp. 243–267. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_12

  3. Apel, K.-O.: Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jonas, G.: Printsip otvetstvennosti. Opyt etiki dlia tekhnologicheskoi tsivilizatsii [The principle of responsibility. Experience of ethics for technological civilization]/transl. from German, foreword and notes by I. I. Makhankov. Airis-Press, Moscow (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchum, C.: Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Habermas, J.: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Polity, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. Open Road Media, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parsons, T.: The Social Systems. Psychology Press, Hove (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gadzhikurbanova, P.A.: Strakh i otvetstvennost’: etika tekhnolog- icheskoi tsivilizatsii Gansa Ionasa [Fear and responsibility: Ethics of the Techno-logical Civilization of Hans Jonas]. Institute of Philosophy, RAS, Moscow (2003). [in Russia]

    Google Scholar 

  10. Solodkaya, M.S.: Moral and ethical responsibility of the subject of management. Credo Orenburg. 6, 33–45 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frederic, R., Petri, E.: Business ethics and philosophical pragmatism. Quest. Philos. 3, 70–78 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kozlovsky, V.V.: Social Justice and Social Responsibility. Znanie, Moscow (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Speransky, V.I.: The Social Responsibility of the Individual: The Nature and Characteristics of the Formation. MSU, Moscow (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kolomak, A.I., Kolomak, N.S.: Etika otvetstvennosti k okru- zhaiushchei nas prirode [Ethics of responsibility towards nature around us]. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2(15), 117–121 (2008). [in Russia]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gelikh, O. Ya.: Sociological analysis of social attitudes of professional and career growth in the context of the digital economy and the knowledge society. Sociol. Law 3(49), 12–24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2020-3-12-24

  16. Sitkovskaya, O.D.: Psychology of guilt and responsibility. Bullet. Univ. Prosecutor’s Off. Russ. Feder. 1(69), 88–92 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Noskova, O.: Corporate social responsibility as a modern tool of social policy and its interpretation. In: Man, Societies, Culture, Socialization: Proceedings of the XV International Youth Scientific and Practical Conference 2019, vol. 1, pp. 178–183. Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla, Ufa (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bielefeldt, A.R.: Professional social responsibility in engineering. In: Muenstermann, I. (ed.) Social Responsibility, IntechOpen, London (2018). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73785

  19. Didier, C., Derouet, A.: Social responsibility in French engineering education: a historical and sociological analysis. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19(4), 1577–1588 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9340-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Canney, N., Russu, M., Bielefeldt, A.: How engineering students define ‘Social Responsibility’. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, El Paso (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344215

  21. Borsen, T., Antia, A.N., Glessmer, M.S.: A case study of teaching social responsibility to doctoral students in the climate sciences. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19(4), 1491–1504 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9485-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Voegtlin, C., Greenwood, M.: Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: a systematic review and conceptual analysis. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 26(3), 181–197 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, B., Hendry, D.G., Borning, A.: A survey of value sensitive design methods. Found. Trends Human Comput. Interact. 11(2), 63-125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015

  24. Burget, M., Bardone, E., Pedaste, M.: Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Sci. Eng. Ethics 23, 1–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thapa, R.K., Iakovleva, T., Foss, L.: Responsible research and innovation: a systematic review of the literature and its applications to regional studies. Eur. Plan. Stud. 12, 2470–2490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1625871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyon, A.R., Brewer, S.K., Areán, P.A.: Leveraging human-centered design to implement modern psychological science: return on an early investment. Am. Psychol. 75(8), 1067–1079 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamborini, M.: Philosophy of biorobotics: translating and composing bio-hybrid forms. Technol. Lang. 3(4), 143–159 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2022.04.10

  28. Ullmann, L.: The Quasi-other as a subject. Technol. Lang. 3(1), 76–81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2022.01.08

  29. Kiryakova, G., Angelova, N., Yordanova, L.: Gamification in Education (2014). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320234774_GAMIFICATION_IN_EDUCATION

  30. Maratou, V., et al.: Game-based learning in higher education using analogue games. Int. J. Film Media Arts 8(1), 68–83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24140/ijfma.v8.n2.00

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liudmila Khalyapina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Almazova, N., Khalyapina, L., Kolomeytsev, I., Noskova, O., Shostak, E. (2023). The Phenomenon of “Social Responsibility” as a Construct of the Humanitarian Educational Ecosystem for the Training of Future Engineers: Perspectives, Forms, Approaches. In: Bylieva, D., Nordmann, A. (eds) The World of Games: Technologies for Experimenting, Thinking, Learning. PCSF 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 829. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48016-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics