Skip to main content

Prospective Responsibility for Multi-agent Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence XL (SGAI 2023)

Abstract

The notion of ‘responsibility’ as a higher-level construct that dynamically impacts each agent’s goals, priorities and actions is very appealing, especially since humans regularly use such concepts in everyday reasoning. In this paper we describe a new model of responsibilities that is philosophically-grounded. We identify traits from the philosophical literature to model, focusing on prospective responsibility and task responsibility. These responsibilities comprise heterogeneous entities, including tasks to be completed, properties that need to be maintained, and sub-responsibilities that need to be fulfilled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Björnsson, G., Brülde, B.: Normative responsibilities: structure and sources. In: Hens, K., Cutas, D., Horstkötter, D. (eds.) Parental Responsibility in the Context of Neuroscience and Genetics. ILELNM, vol. 69, pp. 13–33. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42834-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Braham, M., Van Hees, M.: An anatomy of moral responsibility. Mind 121(483), 601–634 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzs081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calhoun, C.: XI-Responsibilities and Taking on Responsibility. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 119(3), pp. 231–251. Oxford University Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz017

  4. Derakhshan, F., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Dynamic assignment of roles, rights and responsibilities in normative multi-agent systems. J. Log. Comput. 23(2), 355–372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exr027

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: A logic of agent organizations. Logic J. IGPL 20(1), 283–316 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzr041

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Enoch, D.: Being Responsible, Taking Responsibility, and Penumbral Agency. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Feinberg, J.: Responsibility for the future. Philos. Res. Arch. 14, 93–113 (1988). https://doi.org/10.5840/pra1988/19891427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glavaničová, D., Pascucci, M.: Alternative semantics for normative reasoning with an application to regret and responsibility. Logic Logical Philos. 30(4), 653–679 (2021). https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2021.023

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Glavaničová, D., Pascucci, M.: Making sense of vicarious responsibility: moral philosophy meets legal theory. Erkenntnis, pp. 1–22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00525-x

  10. Goodin, R.E.: Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625053

  11. Hart, H.L.A.: Punishment and Responsibility : Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Cooperation, knowledge, and time: alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Stud. Logica. 75(1), 125–157 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026185103185

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Neuhäuser, C.: Structural injustice and the distribution of forward-looking responsibility. Midwest Studies Philos. 38, 232–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oddie, G., Tichỳ, P.: The logic of ability, freedom and responsibility. Stud. Logica. 41(2), 227–248 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370346

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidtz, D., Goodin, R.E., Goodin, R.E., et al.: Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Talbert, M.: Moral Responsibility: An Introduction. Polity Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising. All data supporting this study is provided in Sect. 3, and at the GitHub repository https://github.com/JoeCol/ResponsibilitySimulation This work is supported in the UK both by EPSRC, through the “Computational Agent Responsibility” project, and by the Royal Academy of Engineering, through its “Chair in Emerging Technologies” scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Collenette .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Collenette, J., Dennis, L., Fisher, M. (2023). Prospective Responsibility for Multi-agent Systems. In: Bramer, M., Stahl, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence XL. SGAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14381. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47994-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47994-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47993-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47994-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics