Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural Heritage and Conservation and Insecurity Paradigms: International Law in the Pursuit of Social Cohesion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heritage in War and Peace

Part of the book series: Law and Visual Jurisprudence ((LVJ,volume 12))

  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

Cultural heritage is integral to social cohesion and plays a key role in preventing or at least ameliorating the effects of massive change such as conflict, disasters, and mass migration, including contributing to the recovery, resilience and reconciliation of affected communities. The connection between cultural heritage and human suffering has been repeatedly highlighted in recent decades, including in the conflicts in ex-Yugoslavia, in the genocide in Cambodia, during contemporary armed conflicts in Syria and Mali, and following earthquakes in New Zealand, Italy, and Nepal. While legal frameworks that aim to protect cultural heritage do exist, they tend to focus on cultural heritage only in ‘normal’ times or during conflict. Conversely, norms of international law having to do with other forms of insecurity such as disasters and displacement tend not to consider cultural heritage at all. This contribution will focus on these divisions between a paradigm of insecurity that focuses on heritage as a secondary concern and legal frameworks that apply a paradigm of conservation and prioritise the protection of heritage separate from affected communities. In mapping these dissonances, we can identify significant gaps in our legal response to cultural heritage and call attention to the way in which international legal frameworks condition and shape the social cohesion that is essential to overcoming insecurity. We argue that both paradigms need to be extricated from our legal responses to harm to heritage and that heritage is better integrated into our overall responses to insecurity, using international criminal law as a case study of how to potentially bridge these two paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These are: Ong Chun/Wangchuan/Wangkang ceremony, rituals and related practices for maintaining the sustainable connection between man and the ocean (China and Malaysia), Inscribed in 2020 (15.COM) on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity; Yama, Hoko, Yatai, float festivals in Japan (Japan), Inscribed in 2016 (11.COM) on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity; Kyrgyz epic trilogy: Manas, Semetey, Seytek (Kyrgyzstan), Inscribed in 2013 (8.COM) on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity; and Gangneung Danoje festival (Republic of Korea), Inscribed in 2008 (3.COM) on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity (originally proclaimed in 2005 under a predecessor program, and incorporated into the list via Article 31 of the ICHC).

References

  • Amore A (2016) The governance of built heritage in the post-earthquake Christchurch CBD. In: Hall MC, Malinen S, Vosslamber R, Wordsworth R (eds) Business and post-disaster management: business, organisational and consumer resilience and the Christchurch earthquakes. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard C et al (2020) Disaster as opportunity? Cyclone pam and the transmission of cultural heritage. Anthropol Forum 30(1):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barakat S (2020) Necessary conditions for integrated approaches to the post-conflict recovery of cultural heritage in the Arab world. Int J Herit Stud 27(5):433–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1799061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini G (2020) Cultural heritage and disasters. In: Francioni F, Vrdoljak AF (eds) The Oxford handbook of international cultural heritage law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 145–168

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beazley O, Deacon H (2007) The safeguarding of intangible heritage values under the world heritage convention: Auschwitz, Hiroshima and Robben Island. In: Blake J (ed) Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: challenges and approaches. Institute of Art and Law, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell JS (2013) The politics of preservation: privileging one heritage over another. Int J Cult Prop 20(4):431–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammertz S et al (2016) Attacks against cultural heritage as a weapon of war: prosecutions at the ICTY. J Int Crim Justice 14(5):1143–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumann C, Berliner D (2016) Introduction UNESCO world heritage – grounded? In: Brumann C, Berliner D (eds) World heritage on the ground – ethnographic perspectives. Berghahn Books, New York, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Casaly P (2016) Al Mahdi before the ICC: cultural property and world heritage in international criminal law. J Int Criminal Justice 14(5):1199–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth H (2002) International law: a discipline of crisis. Mod Law Rev 65(3):377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commisso C (2015) The literary refugees of Timbuktu: how a Group of Unlikely Allies Thwarted Al Qaeda and Organized one of the Most brazen cultural heritage evacuations ever attempted. Preserv Digit Technol Cult 44(2):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2015-0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey J et al (2018) Social cohesion and its correlates: a comparison of Western and Asian societies. Comp Sociol 17(3–4):426–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fechner FC (1998) The fundamental aims of cultural property law. Int J Cult Prop 7(2):376–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giblin J (2015) Critical approaches to post-colonial (post-conflict) heritage. In: Waterton E, Watson S (eds) The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 313–328

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giustiniani FZ (2019) Protecting world cultural and natural heritage against climate change and disasters: an assessment of the effectiveness of the world heritage convention system. Yearbook of International Disaster Law 2:233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R (2013) Heritage: critical approaches. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • ICC (2016a) Prosecutor v Al Mahdi, ICC-01/12–01/15, Pre-Trial Chamber I, Decision on the confirmation of charges against Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, 16 March 2016, Available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2016_02424.PDF

  • ICC (2016b) Prosecutor v Al Mahdi, ICC-01/12–01/15, Trial Chamber, Judgment and Sentence, 27 September 2016, Available at https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2016_07244.PDF

  • ICC (2017), Prosecutor v Al Mahdi, ICC-01/12–01/15, Trial Chamber, Reparations Order, 17 August 2017. Available at https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2017_05117.PDF

  • ILC (2018) Draft articles on the protection of persons in the event of disasters, Adopted by the International Law Commission at its sixty-eighth session, in 2016, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session (A/71/10), para. 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Isakhan B, Meskell L (2019) UNESCO's project to 'revive the spirit of Mosul': Iraqi and Syrian opinion on heritage reconstruction after the Islamic state. Int J Herit Stud 25(11):1189–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannot-Gradis C (2015) Protecting the past for the future: how does law protect tangible and intangible cultural heritage in armed conflict? International Review of the Red Cross 97(900):1253–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekakis S, Shakya S, Kostakis V (2018) Bringing the community Back: a case study of the post-earthquake heritage restoration in Kathmandu Valley. Sustainability 10(8):2798–2814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lixinski L (2019) International heritage law for communities: exclusion and re-imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lixinski L (2021) Legalized identities: cultural heritage law and the shaping of transitional justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Long C, Reeves K (2009) ‘Dig a hole and bury the past in it’: reconciliation and the heritage of genocide in Cambodia. In: Logan W, Reeves K (eds) Places of pain and shame: dealing with ‘difficult heritage’. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal D (2005) Why sanctions seldom work: reflections on cultural property internationalism. Int J Cult Prop 12(3):393–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSCE (2020) High Commissioner on National Minorities and COVID-19. Available via OSCE, https://www.osce.org/hcnm/450529

  • OTP, Policy on Cultural Heritage (June 2021). Available at https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/itemsDocuments/20210614-otp-policy-cultural-heritage-eng.pdf

  • Paauwe J, Pittalwala J (2021) Cultural protection and mass atrocity crimes: strengthening protection of intangible cultural heritage. Global Responsibility to Protect 13:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldin M (2019) Heritage as resilience. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_3404-1

  • UNESCO (1968), Meeting of Experts to Co-ordinate With a View to Their International Adoption, the Principles and Scientific, Technical and Legal Criteria Which Would Make It Possible to Establish an Effective System for the Protection of Monuments and Sites, para. 14, U.N. Doc. No. SHC/CS/27/3 (Jan. 26, 1968) (prepared by G. De Angelis d’Ossat)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2020) COVID-19 Response. Available via UNESCO, https://en.unesco.org/coviF239

  • UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage, Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Adopted by the General Assembly of the States Parties to the Convention at its second session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 16 to 19 June 2008), amended at its third session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 22 to 24 June 2010), its fourth session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 4 to 8 June 2012), its fifth session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 2 to 4 June 2014), its sixth session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 30 May to 1 June 2016), its seventh session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 4 to 6 June 2018), its eighth session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 8 to 10 September 2020) and its ninth session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 5 to 7 July 2022)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO World Heritage Committee (2007) Strategy for Reducing Risks from Disasters at World Heritage Properties. (Doc WHC-07/31.COM/7.2), at https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2007/whc07-31com-72e.pdf

  • UNESCO World Heritage Committee, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, Doc. WHC.21/01 (31 July 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Law Commission (2018) Draft articles on the protection of persons in the event of disasters 2016. Yearbook of the International Law Commission II

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrdoljak AF (2018) Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi: judgment and Sentence & Reparations Order (Int'l Crim. Ct.). Int Leg Mater 57(1):17–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2018.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Heritage Committee (2022) UN Policies and UNESCO Strategy. Heritage in DRR policies – The Sendai Framework. Available via UNESCO, https://whc.unesco.org/en/disaster-risk-reduction/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Global and Public Law, Faculty of Law and Justice, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Lucas Lixinski & Sarah Williams

Authors
  1. Lucas Lixinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Lixinski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Gianluigi Mastandrea Bonaviri

  2. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

    Mirosław Michał Sadowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lixinski, L., Williams, S. (2024). Cultural Heritage and Conservation and Insecurity Paradigms: International Law in the Pursuit of Social Cohesion. In: Mastandrea Bonaviri, G., Sadowski, M.M. (eds) Heritage in War and Peace. Law and Visual Jurisprudence, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47347-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47347-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47346-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47347-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation