Abstract
Online aggressions have been widely reported worldwide and referenced as great harm since they bring immeasurable negative repercussions to those involved. Although social media websites’ official policy prohibits hate speech, the literature shows that aggressive content is still noticeable among the comments and disseminated publications in many online social networks. Meanwhile, the aggressive posts’ contents have yet to be explored in detail, including those associated with Portuguese social media groups. This paper aims to provide information on how aggression translates and is expressed online, considering two sources. The first sample is taken from eight transcribed interviews with Portuguese university students who have already been involved in aggressive online situations and shared the exact text content of the attacks. The second source was a series of posts from 151 Portuguese university student open groups on Facebook and Instagram that presented aggressive comments. A content analysis was performed with both samples separated for comparison, seeking similarities and patterns in both aggressive text analyses. Moreover, a thematic analysis was conducted to gather knowledge regarding the most frequent subjects among the aggressive content posted. While communications reported in interviews focus on image and body, death, and gender identity, themes such as immigrants, politics, lack of university support, and academic traditions emerged in the social network. The findings enhance knowledge regarding linguistics on cyberaggression and provide parameters for future research on detecting aggression situations online.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The approval of the Ethics Committee can be found at the following link: https://zenodo.org/record/8199478.
References
Bardin L (2009) Análise de Conteúdo Edições 70 (ed) Persona
Ben-David A, Matamoros-Fernández A (2016) Hate speech and covert discrimination on social media: Monitoring the Facebook pages of extreme-right political parties in Spain. Int J Commun 10:1167–1193
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Psychiatr Q 3(2): 77–101. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11752478
Costa AP, Amado J (2018) Análise de Conteúdo suportada com software. Ludomedia
Cunningham CE et al (2015) Modeling the anti-cyberbullying preferences of university students: Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Aggressive Behav 41(4):369–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21560
D’Angelo E, Ferrero F, Scioneri V (2018) eMORE webapp for monitoring and reporting online hate speech: a cross-cutting analysis of data collected using the eMORE webapp in 9 EU countries. 1–104. https://www.rissc.it/homepage/our-projects/emore-project/
eMORE (2017) An overview on hate crime and hate speech in 9 EU countries. 1–42
Ernst J, Schmitt JB, Rieger D, Beier AK, Bente G, Roth H (2017) Hate beneath the counter speech? A qualitative content analysis of user comments on YouTube related to counter speech videos. J. Deradicalization 10:1–49
Fortuna P (2017) Automatic detection of hate speech in text: an overview of the topic and dataset annotation with hierarchical classes [University of Porto]. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/106028
Gonçalves L, Oliveira L (2021) When knowledge meets digital: a systematic literature review about digital platforms and knowledge flow. Springer Series Design Innov. 8:35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49647-0_3
Gonçalves SP, Gonçalves JP, Marques CG (2021). Manual de Investigação Qualitativa. In Manual de Investigação Qualitativa, p. 300. PACTOR
Hosseinmardi H, Mattson SA, Rafiq RI, Han R, Lv Q, Mishra S (2015) Analyzing labeled cyberbullying incidents on the instagram social network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9471:49–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27433-1_4
Infopédia (2023) Vergonha
Lusa (2020)Covid-19: Maioria dos estudantes foi vitima de bullying durante pandemia, diz estudo. 1. https://www.iscte-iul.pt/noticias/1706/maioria-estudantes-vitima-de-cyberbullying-durante-pandemia
Malmasi S, Zampieri M (2018) Challenges in discriminating profanity from hate speech. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 30(2):187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2017.1409284
Müller K, Schwarz C (2017) Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime. Ssrnhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082972
Neves F (2016) 10 a 20% dos jovens são vítimas de cyberbullying. https://www.dn.pt/sociedade/10-a-20-dos-jovens-sao-vitimas-de-cyberbullying-5141247.html
Oliveira E, Baldi V (2022) Systematic Review on Cybersecurity Risks and Behaviours: Methodological Approaches [Paper presentation]. COMPLEXIS 2022: 7th International Conference on Complexity, Future Information Systems and Risk. https://www.scitepress.org/PublicationsDetail.aspx?ID=J1bkQc7t494=&t=1
Ponte C, Batista S (2019) EU Kids Online Portugal. Usos, competências, riscos e mediações da internet reportados por crianças e jovens (9–17 anos). http://fabricadesites.fcsh.unl.pt/eukidsonline/documentos/
PORDATA (2021) Indivíduos com 16 e mais anos que utilizam computador e Internet em % do total de indivíduos: por nível de escolaridade mais elevado completo. https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Indivíduos+com+16+e+mais+anos+que+utilizam+computador+e+Internet+em+percentagem+do+total+de+indivíduos+por+nível+de+escolaridade+mais+elevado+completo-1141
Van Schaik P, Jeske D, Onibokun J, Coventry L, Jansen J, Kusev P (2017) Risk perceptions of cyber-security and precautionary behaviour. Comput Human Behav 75(May 2017): 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.038
WHO (1998) WHOQOL User Manual (Issue January)
Young R, Miles S, Alhabash S (2018) Attacks by anons: a content analysis of aggressive posts, victim responses, and bystander interventions on a social media site. social media and society 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118762444
Zhong H et al (2016) Content-driven detection of cyberbullying on the instagram social network. IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2016-Janua: 3952–3958. https://doi.org/10.1145/2742647.2745908
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported by national funds through FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., under the project UIDB/05460/2020, and through the FCT fellowship 2020.04575.BD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Oliveira, E., Oliveira, L., Baldi, V. (2024). Analysis of Cyberaggression in Social Networks Involving Students and University Environments. In: Martins, N., Brandão, D. (eds) Advances in Design and Digital Communication IV. DIGICOM 2023. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47281-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47281-7_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47280-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47281-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)