Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Guidelines for Sustainable Online Behaviors. Green Computing Practices to Reduce the Digital Carbon Footprint

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design and Digital Communication IV (DIGICOM 2023)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Design and Innovation ((SSDI,volume 35))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

The current state of concern for the environment and awareness of the climate emergency have become prevalent issues. The environmental impact resulting from the use and expansion of digital infrastructure highlights the need for greater awareness and action on this topic. While the consumption of material resources can often be perceived through the associated financial cost, the energy consumption caused by the use of digital products, services, and systems remains invisible to users. This article proposes to focus on the area of Green Computing, as it is believed that this discipline can contribute to the reduction of the digital carbon footprint.

The aim of the study was to conduct a literature review and a critical and informed analysis of Sustainable Online Behaviors. Building upon the guidelines proposed by Elgaaïed-Gambier et al., 2020, we sought to extend their scope in order to derive an expanded set of Green Computing Practices aimed at mitigating the Digital Carbon Footprint.

Through the proposed guidelines, we believe that Green Computing practices can be disseminated and reach various layers of society, contributing to digital citizenship that can educate children and young people about the importance of this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Narang R, Tiwari S (2021) Antecedents and consequences of the growing popularity of digital consumption. In: Khosrow-Pour DBAM (ed) Encyclopedia of information science and technology. 5th edn. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 1066–1084. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch073

  2. Mairano MV (2021) Emotions and digital delivery platforms: an approach to the configuration of sensibilities during the isolation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Korstanje M (ed) Socio-economic effects and recovery efforts for the rental industry: post-COVID-19 strategies. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 178–193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7287-0.ch010

  3. Internet World Stats. Internet usage statistics. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.html. Accessed 27 May 2022

  4. Page Bloat Update. https://www.speedcurve.com/blog/ten-years-page-bloat/. Accessed 21 June 2022

  5. Parikka J (2021) Working for systems that do not do the work. Joana Moll’s the hidden life of an amazon user. Interface Critique 3:81–85. https://doi.org/10.11588/ic.2021.3.81325

  6. Preist C, Schien D, Shabajee P, Wood S, Hodgson C (2014) Analyzing end-to-end energy consumption for digital services. Computer 47(5):92–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2014.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gougis L. Les clés pour comprendre la pollution numérique. Science et Vie. https://www.science-et-vie.com/article-magazine/les-cles-pour-comprendre-la-pollution-numerique. Accessed 14 Apr 2022

  8. We Are Social. Percentage of all global web pages served to mobile phones from 2009 to 2018. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018/. Accessed 16 Jan 2023

  9. Digital 2021: Global Overview Report. DataReportal–Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-global-overview-report. Accessed 13 Dec 2022

  10. The Shift Project. https://theshiftproject.org/en/our-purpose/. Accessed 11 May 2022

  11. Monserrate SG (2022) The cloud is material: on the environmental impacts of computation and data storage. MIT case studies in social and ethical responsibilities of computing. https://doi.org/10.21428/2c646de5.031d4553

  12. Bridle J (2018) New dark age: technology and the end of the future. Verso, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suski P, Pohl J, Frick V (2020) All you can stream: investigating the role of user behavior for greenhouse gas intensity of video streaming. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on ICT for sustainability (ICT4S2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/3401335.3401709

  14. Suckling J, Lee J (2015) Redefining scope: the true environmental impact of smartphones? Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1181–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0909-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fehske A, Fettweis G, Malmodin J, Biczók G (2011) The global footprint of mobile communications: the ecological and economic perspective. IEEE Commun Mag

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bawden T. Global warming: data centres to consume three times as much energy in next decade, experts warn, independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/global-warming-data-centres-to-consume-three-times-as-much-energy-in-next-decade-experts-warn-a6830086.html. Accessed 28 June 2022

  17. Elgaaïed-Gambier L, Bertrandias L, Bernard Y (2020) Cutting the internet’s environmental footprint: an analysis of consumers’ self-attribution of responsibility. J Interact Mark 50:120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alcott B (2005) Jevons’ paradox. Ecol Econ 54(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones N (2018) How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. Nature, 561:163–166. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06610-y

  20. Belkhir L, Elmeligi A (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations. J Clean Prod 177:448–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Energuide. Consumption. https://www.energuide.be/en/consumption-and-rates/consumption/10/. Accessed 22 May 2022

  22. Griffiths S. Why your internet habits are not as clean as you think. BBC Future. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200305-why-your-internet-habits-are-not-as-clean-as-you-think. Accessed 11 July 2022

  23. Mills E, Bourassa N, Rainer L, Mai J, Shehabi A, Mills N (2019) Toward greener gaming: estimating national energy use and energy efficiency potential. Comput Games J 8(3–4):157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-019-00084-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holthaus E. Bitcoin could cost us our clean-energy future, Grist. https://grist.org/article/bitcoin-could-cost-us-our-clean-energy-future/. Accessed 27 July 2022

  25. Stoll C, Klaaßen L, Gallersdörfer U (2019) The carbon footprint of bitcoin. Joule 3(7): 1647–1661.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.012

  26. Masson-Delmotte V et al (2021) Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2021: the physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang P, Fan YV, Klemeš JJ (2021) Impacts of COVID-19 on energy demand and consumption: challenges, lessons and emerging opportunities. Appl Energy 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116441

  28. Climate change: is your netflix habit bad for the environment? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45798523. Accessed 03 Mar 2023

  29. Bartelmus P (2003) Dematerialization and capital maintenance: two sides of the sustainability coin. Ecol Econ 46(1):61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Institute of Energy Economics. Japan long-term energy outlook – a projection up to 2030 under environmental constraints and changing energy markets. www.neken.ieej.or.jp. Accessed 09 Feb 2023

  31. Microsoft Azure. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/services/cloud-services/. Accessed 12 Feb 2023

  32. Williams DR, Thomond P, Mackenzie I (2014) The greenhouse gas abatement potential of enterprise cloud computing. Environ Model Softw 56:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Foster ST, Sampson S, Wallin C, Webb S (2016) Managing supply chain and operations. Pearson, NY

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gui M, Fasoli M, Carradore R (2017) Digital well-being. Developing a new theoretical tool for media literacy research. Italian J Sociol Educ Padova (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mayers K, Koomey J, Hall R, Bauer M, France C, Webb A (2015) The carbon footprint of games distribution. J Ind Ecol 19(3):402–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gnanasekaran V et al (2021) Digital carbon footprint awareness among digital natives: an exploratory study. No. 1. NIK Norsk informatikkonferanse, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mittal B (1999) The advertising of services: meeting the challenge of intangibility. J Serv Res 2(1):98–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467059921008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mazaheri E, Richard MO, Laroche M, Ueltschy LC (2014) The influence of culture, emotions, intangibility, and atmospheric cues on online behavior. J Bus Res 67(3):253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahn M, Kang J, Hustvedt G (2015) A model of sustainable household technology acceptance: sustainable household technology acceptance model. Int J Consum Stud 40(1):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cerri D, Terzi S (2016) Proposal of a toolset for the improvement of industrial systems’ lifecycle sustainability through the utilization of ICT technologies. Comput Ind 81:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29(3):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hadler M, Haller M (2011) Global activism and nationally driven recycling: the influence of world society and national contexts on public and private environmental behavior. Int Sociol 26(3):315–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910392258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Venkadeshwaran K. Green technology and its effect on the modern world. Jetir. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIREW06032.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2023

  44. Røpke I, Christensen TH (2012) Energy impacts of ICT and Insights from an everyday life perspective. Telematics Inform 29(4):348–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Murugesan S, Gangadharan GR (2012) Harnessing green IT: principles and practices. Wiley, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Chugh R, Wibowo S, Grandh S (2016) Environmentally sustainable information and communication technology usage: awareness and practices of Indian information and communication technology professionals. J Clean Prod 131:435–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bose R, Luo X (2011) Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake green IT initiatives via virtualization – a theoretical perspective. J Strateg Inf Syst 20(1):38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2011.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Daly HE (1993) Sustainable development: an impossibility theorem. In: Daly HE, Townsend KN (eds) Valuing the earth. economics, ecology, ethics. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by ITI/LARSyS (Interactive Technologies Institute) – ITI-LX UIDP/50009/2020.X

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ITI/LARSyS, Faculty of Fine-Arts, University of Lisbon, Largo da Academia Nacional e Belas Artes, 1249-058, Lisbon, Portugal

    Sónia Rafael

  2. Faculty of Fine-Arts, University of Lisbon, Largo da Academia Nacional e Belas Artes, 1249-058, Lisbon, Portugal

    Matilde Reis

Authors
  1. Sónia Rafael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matilde Reis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sónia Rafael .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for Design, Media and Culture, School of Design, Polytechnic Institute of Cavado and Ave, Barcelos, Portugal

    Nuno Martins

  2. Communication and Society Research Centre, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Daniel Brandão

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rafael, S., Reis, M. (2024). Guidelines for Sustainable Online Behaviors. Green Computing Practices to Reduce the Digital Carbon Footprint. In: Martins, N., Brandão, D. (eds) Advances in Design and Digital Communication IV. DIGICOM 2023. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47281-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47281-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47281-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation