Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Critical Appraisal of Batteries with Metal Phosphate Among Commercial Batteries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering to Adapt (TELAC 2023)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Energy ((SPE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

Power storage devices have been proven to be beneficial for electricity generation. A battery device is structured with an electronic element outside the cell and an electrolyte that transfers ionic element of the chemical reaction within the battery. On discharge, the output is an exterior electrical current at a certain voltage. When implementing a charging voltage and current, chemical reaction of a rechargeable battery must be reversible. Safety, energy density at a specific energy output, storage efficiency, shelf and cycle life, and fabrication cost are among the critical factors of rechargeable batteries. During charge and discharge, Li-ion power units are rechargeable battery types in which Li-ions flow from the negative to the positive electrode. Cost, performance, safety, and chemistry parameters change across Li-ion battery types. In consumer electronics, Li-ion batteries are widely used. Li-ion batteries, unlike Li main cells which are disposable, utilize an intervened Li combination as the electrode material rather than metallic Li. They have one of the best weight-to-power rates, no memory impact, a low self-discharge ratio, a considerable open circuit voltage, and slow loss of charge while not in utilization, making them one of the most comprehensive types of rechargeable power units for portable devices. Due to their high power density, Li-ion batteries are becoming more popular in military, aerospace implementations, and electric cars. In this study, an analysis is made using a multi-attribute decision-support technique for the rechargeable batteries available in the commercial market. A critical evaluation is carried out to determine the most efficient rechargeable battery by using the important parameters in terms of their efficiencies. Research findings on general and current developments in lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries with metal phosphate were compiled and its place among the suitable rechargeable batteries is determined with the help of mathematical analysis. The research aims to guide the relevant people on the selection of rechargeable batteries. The technical properties of batteries with metal phosphate among commercial batteries were investigated. A criteria set is developed for the assessment of rechargeable batteries. Six rechargeable battery alternatives are investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. https://www.cei.washington.edu/education/science-of-solar/battery-technology/

  2. B. Huang et al., Recycling of lithium-ion batteries: recent advances and perspectives. J. Power Sources 399, 274–286 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Lain, J. Brandon, E. Kendrick, Design strategies for high power vs. high energy lithium ion cells. Batteries 5(4), 64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5040064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Huang, G. Du, Nickel-based batteries for medium- and large-scale energy storage. Adv. Batteries Medium Large-Scale Energy Storage 73–90 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Innocenzi et al., A review of the processes and lab-scale techniques for the treatment of spent rechargeable NiMH batteries. J. Power Sourc. 362, 202–218 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Memory effect now also found in lithium-ion batteries. Retrieved 5 August 2022

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Koohi-Fayegh, M.A. Rosen, A review of energy storage types, applications, and recent developments. J Energy Storage 2020(27), 101047 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.O. Akinyele, R.K. Rayudu, Review of energy storage technologies for sustainable power networks. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Ziemba, Inter-criteria dependencies-based decision support in the sustainable wind energy management. Energies 12, 749 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Watróbski, J. Jankowski, P. Ziemba, A. Karczmarczyk, M. Zioło, Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86, 107–124 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. I.B. Huang, J. Keisler, I. Linkov, Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci. Total. Environ. 409(19), 3578–3594 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Belton, T. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach (Springer, US, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Talukder, K.W. Hipel, Review and Selection of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Technique for Sustainability Assessment, in BT—Energy Systems Evaluation, vol. 1 (2021), pp. 145–160

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Li, P. Liu, Z. Li, X. Wang, A multi-objective optimization approach for selection of energy storage systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 115, 213–225 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.G. Olabi, Renewable energy and energy storage systems. Energy 136, 1–6 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Dhundhara, Y.P. Verma, A. Williams, Techno-economic analysis of the lithium-ion and lead-acid battery in microgrid systems. Energy Convers. Manage. 177, 122–142 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Zhang, Y.-L. Wei, P.-F. Cao, M.-C. Lin, Energy storage system: Current studies on batteries and power condition system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 3091–3106 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Nikolaidis, A. Poullikkas, Cost metrics of electrical energy storage technologies in potential power system operations. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 25, 43–59 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Poullikkas, A comparative overview of large-scale battery systems for electricity storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 27, 778–788 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Yang, S. Bremner, C. Menictas, M. Kay, Battery energy storage system size determination in renewable energy systems: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91, 109–125 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. https://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/batteries/battery_characteristics.php#2

  22. N. Imanishi, O. Yamamoto, Rechargeable lithium-air batteries: characteristics and prospects. Mater. Today 17(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. https://www.mpoweruk.com/performance.htm

  24. J. Garche, C.K. Dyer, P.T. Moseley, Z. Ogumi, D.A.J. Rand, B. Scrosati, Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources. Newnes 407 (2013). ISBN 978-0-444-52745-5

    Google Scholar 

  25. https://www.large-battery.com/news/11.html

  26. A. Väyrynen, J. Salminen, Lithium-ion battery production. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 46, 80–85 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2011.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Linden, T.B. Reddy, (eds.), Handbook of Batteries, 3rd edn (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002). Chapter 35. ISBN 0-07-135978-8

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lithium-Ion Battery Charging Basics (PowerStream Technologies, 2010). Retrieved 4 December 2010

    Google Scholar 

  29. https://www.plarad.de/fileadmin/downloads/FAQ_related%20to%20lithium%20ion%20rechargeable%20battery%20care_DA1_en_0216.pdf

  30. D.H.P. Kang, M. Chen, O.A. Ogunseitan, Potential environmental and human health impacts of rechargeable lithium batteries in electronic waste. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47(10), 5495–5503 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/es400614y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. https://batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-808c-coulombic-and-energy-efficiency-with-the-battery

  32. P. Kurzweil, Gaston Planté and his invention of the lead–acid battery—the genesis of the first practical rechargeable battery. J. Power. Sourc. 195(14), 4424–4434 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Lyu, X. Liu, J. Qu, J. Zhao, Y. Huo, Z. Qu, Z. Rao, Recent advances of thermal safety of lithium-ion battery for energy storage. Energy Storage Mater. 31, 195–220 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. X. Liu, Y. Li, X. Xu, L. Zhou, L. Mai, Rechargeable metal (Li, Na, Mg, Al)-sulfur batteries: materials and advances. J. Energy Chem. 61, 104–134 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Oshima, M. Kajita, A. Okuno, Development of sodium-sulfur batteries. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 1(3), 269–276 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Yang, H. Yang, X. Wang, Y. Bai, C. Wu, Multivalent metal–sulfur batteries for green and cost-effective energy storage: current status and challenges. J. Energy Chem. 64, 144–165 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Assefi et al., Recycling of Ni-Cd batteries by selective isolation and hydrothermal synthesis of porous NiO nano cuboid. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6(4), 4671–4675 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. Bresser, E. Paillard, S. Passerini, Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for medium- and large-scale energy storage. Adv. Batter. Medium Large-Scale Energy Storage 125–211 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Perner, J. Vetter, Lithium-ion batteries for hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles. Adv. Battery Technol. Electric. Veh. 173–190 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Morris, S. Tosunoglu, Comparıson of rechargeable battery technologies, in ASME Early Career Technical Journal 2012 ASME Early Career Technical Conference (ASME ECT, Atlanta, Georgia USA)

    Google Scholar 

  41. E. Mu, M. Pereyra-Rojas, Practical Decision Making: An Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Using Super Decisions, vol. 2 (Springer, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of METE, Engineering Faculty, Firat University, Elazığ, Turkey

    Figen Balo

  2. Department of Management and Marketing, Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, USA

    Lutfu S. Sua

Authors
  1. Figen Balo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lutfu S. Sua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Figen Balo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical, Automotive and Materials Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada

    David S-K. Ting

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tennessee Technology University, Cookeville, TX, USA

    Ahmad Vasel-Be-Hagh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Balo, F., Sua, L.S. (2023). A Critical Appraisal of Batteries with Metal Phosphate Among Commercial Batteries. In: Ting, D.SK., Vasel-Be-Hagh, A. (eds) Engineering to Adapt. TELAC 2023. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47237-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation