Abstract
The inter-disciplinary approach to resolve issues baffling humankind has proven to be extremely beneficial. It allows a deeper understanding of the problems leading to better designing of solutions. It enables the researchers to have multiple perspectives around the same problem. In this direction, environmental harms, wrongs, and crimes were no more a problem only related to the nature. They also constituted a human rights issue. In the same vein, the human rights activists must be credited for the protection of human rights embedded in the enjoyment of a healthy environment.
Likewise, when feminism emerged as a means for the emancipation of women, protection of their rights and their empowerment, it swayed upon various other fields of study as well. This led to the generation of ecofeminism. Ecofeminism travelled through different phases just like the idea of feminism did. The oppression of women and exploitation of environment because of domination by ‘man’ and patriarchal thinking led to various theories leading to the proposition that these two entities share a lot of commonalities. Hence, there came up different waves of ecofeminism.
The need of sustainable solutions for the protection of environment also acted as an impetus to the use of restorative approach and philosophy. The restorative approach shares some essential ingredients with the feminist approach. This paper will discuss the triad of feminist approach, restorative approach, and the environment protection with the vision to make environmental protection sounder and more efficacious.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Morrow (2013), p. 377.
- 2.
Goodmark (2018).
- 3.
EFRJ (2021).
- 4.
Wijdekop (n.d.).
- 5.
Hadeel and Hamilton (2019).
- 6.
Preston (2011).
- 7.
Mika et al. (2004), p. 139.
- 8.
UN (2002).
- 9.
White (2014/2015), pp. 43–54.
- 10.
Preston (2011), p. 4.
- 11.
Johnstone and Ness (2013), p. 270.
- 12.
Hadeel and Hamilton (2019), p. 1464.
- 13.
Goodmark (2018), p. 374.
- 14.
White (2014), pp. 43–54.
- 15.
Goodmark (2018), p. 374.
- 16.
Ibid.
- 17.
Ibid.
- 18.
Pali and Biffi (2019), p. 18.
- 19.
Ibid.
- 20.
Ibid.
- 21.
Pali and Biffi (2019), p. 23.
- 22.
Ibid.
- 23.
Forest Research (n.d.).
- 24.
EFRJ (2021).
- 25.
Breuil et al. (2014).
- 26.
Goodmark (2018), p. 374.
- 27.
Pali and Biffi (2019), p. 11.
- 28.
White (2014), pp. 43–54.
- 29.
Garrett v. Williams, (2007) 151 LGERA 92.
- 30.
- 31.
CEJF (2012).
- 32.
Pali and Biffi (2019), pp. 68–71.
- 33.
Goodmark (2018), p. 374.
- 34.
Hadeel and Hamilton (2019), p. 1471.
- 35.
Ibid.
- 36.
Canterbury Regional Council v. Interflow (NZ) Ltd. (Interflow), [2015] NZDC 3323.
- 37.
- 38.
Rural Litigation and Environmental Kendra v. State, AIR 1988 SC 2187.
- 39.
Pali and Biffi (2019).
- 40.
Voice of Nature Kinstitute (n.d.).
- 41.
Larschan and Brennan (1983).
References
Breuil BO, Schuilenburg M, Steden R (2014) Positive criminology: reflections on care, belonging and security. Eleven International Publishing, Den Haag
CEJF (2012) Province of British Columbia. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/research-monitoring-and-reporting/reporting/reporting-documents/environmental-enforcement-docs/cejf-policy.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2021
EFRJ (2021) Comments on the EU Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on improving environmental protection through criminal law. https://www.euforumrj.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/EFRJ%20contribution%20EU%20Directive%20Environmental%20Criminal%20Law%203.05.2021%20%281%29.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2021
EPA Victoria (n.d.-a) “Enforceable Undertakings.” Environment Protection Authority Victoria. https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/about-epa/what-we-do/compliance-and-enforcement/enforceable-undertakings. Accessed 27 Nov 2021
EPA Victoria (n.d.-b) “Protecting Human Health.” Environment Protection Authority Victoria. https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/about-epa/what-we-do/protecting-human-health. Accessed 27 Nov 2021
Forest Research (n.d.) Evidence Base for ‘Offenders and Nature’ Schemes. https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/research/evaluation-of-forestry-commission-offenders-and-nature-on-schemes/evidence-base-for-offenders-and-nature-schemes/. Accessed 27 Nov 2021
Goodmark L (2018) Restorative justice as feminist practice. Int J Restorative Practice 1(3):373–384. https://doi.org/10.5553/IJRJ/258908912018001003003
Hadeel A, Hamilton M (2019) The ingredients of success for effective restorative justice conferencing in an environmental offending context. Univ N S W Law J 42(4):1460–1488. https://doi.org/10.53637/zean8618
Johnstone G, Ness D (2013) Handbook of restorative justice. Routledge, London
Larschan B, Brennan BC (1983) Common heritage of mankind principle in international law. Colum J Trans Law 21(2):305–338
Mika H, Achilles M, Halbert E, Amstutz LS, Zehr H (2004) Listening to victims - a critique of restorative justice policy and practice in the United States. Fed Probat 68(1):32–38
Morrow K (2013) Ecofeminism and the environment: international law and climate change. In: Munro VE, Davies M (eds) The Ashgate research companion to feminist legal theory, 1st edn. Routledge, London, pp 377–393
Pali B, Biffi E (2019) Environmental justice: restoring the future. European Forum for Restorative Justice
Preston BJ (2011) The use of restorative justice for environmental crime. The use of restorative justice for environmental crime _EP… (ssrn.com). Accessed 27 Nov 2021
UN (2002) ECOSOC Resolution 2002/12 https://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/2002/resolution%202002-12.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2021
Voice of Nature Kinstitute (n.d.) Restorative justice. https://voiceofnaturekinstitute.org/environmental_justice/restorative-justice. Accessed 27 2021
White R (2014/2015) Indigenous communities, environmental protection and restorative justice. Aust Indig Law Rev 18(2):43–54
Wijdekop F (n.d.) Restorative Justice: a suitable response to environmental crime? upload745.pdf (harmonywithnatureun.org). Accessed 5 July 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marwah, A. (2023). Environmental Justice: From the Bifocal Lens of Restorative Justice and the Feminist Approach. In: Talukdar, S., de Aquino, V.E. (eds) Judicial Responses to Climate Change in the Global South. Living Signs of Law, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46142-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46142-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46141-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46142-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)