Skip to main content

Environmental Justice: From the Bifocal Lens of Restorative Justice and the Feminist Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Judicial Responses to Climate Change in the Global South

Part of the book series: Living Signs of Law ((LSLAW,volume 2))

  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

The inter-disciplinary approach to resolve issues baffling humankind has proven to be extremely beneficial. It allows a deeper understanding of the problems leading to better designing of solutions. It enables the researchers to have multiple perspectives around the same problem. In this direction, environmental harms, wrongs, and crimes were no more a problem only related to the nature. They also constituted a human rights issue. In the same vein, the human rights activists must be credited for the protection of human rights embedded in the enjoyment of a healthy environment.

Likewise, when feminism emerged as a means for the emancipation of women, protection of their rights and their empowerment, it swayed upon various other fields of study as well. This led to the generation of ecofeminism. Ecofeminism travelled through different phases just like the idea of feminism did. The oppression of women and exploitation of environment because of domination by ‘man’ and patriarchal thinking led to various theories leading to the proposition that these two entities share a lot of commonalities. Hence, there came up different waves of ecofeminism.

The need of sustainable solutions for the protection of environment also acted as an impetus to the use of restorative approach and philosophy. The restorative approach shares some essential ingredients with the feminist approach. This paper will discuss the triad of feminist approach, restorative approach, and the environment protection with the vision to make environmental protection sounder and more efficacious.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Morrow (2013), p. 377.

  2. 2.

    Goodmark (2018).

  3. 3.

    EFRJ (2021).

  4. 4.

    Wijdekop (n.d.).

  5. 5.

    Hadeel and Hamilton (2019).

  6. 6.

    Preston (2011).

  7. 7.

    Mika et al. (2004), p. 139.

  8. 8.

    UN (2002).

  9. 9.

    White (2014/2015), pp. 43–54.

  10. 10.

    Preston (2011), p. 4.

  11. 11.

    Johnstone and Ness (2013), p. 270.

  12. 12.

    Hadeel and Hamilton (2019), p. 1464.

  13. 13.

    Goodmark (2018), p. 374.

  14. 14.

    White (2014), pp. 43–54.

  15. 15.

    Goodmark (2018), p. 374.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    Pali and Biffi (2019), p. 18.

  19. 19.

    Ibid.

  20. 20.

    Ibid.

  21. 21.

    Pali and Biffi (2019), p. 23.

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Forest Research (n.d.).

  24. 24.

    EFRJ (2021).

  25. 25.

    Breuil et al. (2014).

  26. 26.

    Goodmark (2018), p. 374.

  27. 27.

    Pali and Biffi (2019), p. 11.

  28. 28.

    White (2014), pp. 43–54.

  29. 29.

    Garrett v. Williams, (2007) 151 LGERA 92.

  30. 30.

    EPA Victoria (n.d.-a, n.d.-b).

  31. 31.

    CEJF (2012).

  32. 32.

    Pali and Biffi (2019), pp. 68–71.

  33. 33.

    Goodmark (2018), p. 374.

  34. 34.

    Hadeel and Hamilton (2019), p. 1471.

  35. 35.

    Ibid.

  36. 36.

    Canterbury Regional Council v. Interflow (NZ) Ltd. (Interflow), [2015] NZDC 3323.

  37. 37.

    EPA Victoria (n.d.-a, n.d.-b).

  38. 38.

    Rural Litigation and Environmental Kendra v. State, AIR 1988 SC 2187.

  39. 39.

    Pali and Biffi (2019).

  40. 40.

    Voice of Nature Kinstitute (n.d.).

  41. 41.

    Larschan and Brennan (1983).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marwah, A. (2023). Environmental Justice: From the Bifocal Lens of Restorative Justice and the Feminist Approach. In: Talukdar, S., de Aquino, V.E. (eds) Judicial Responses to Climate Change in the Global South. Living Signs of Law, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46142-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46142-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46141-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46142-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics