Zusammenfassung
Die Blockchain-Technologie hat beispiellose Fortschritte im Energiesektor ermöglicht, den Weg zu einer kohlenstoffarmen Wirtschaft geebnet und sozioökonomische und ökologische Übergänge vorangetrieben. Dieses Kapitel untersucht die rechtlichen und regulatorischen Herausforderungen von Blockchain-Anwendungen, die auf drei Schlüsselbereichen basieren: Privatrecht, Strafrecht und öffentliches und Verwaltungsrecht. Da diese Herausforderungen globale Debatten prägen, bietet dieses Kapitel verfeinerte und systemische Diskussionen und trägt zu neuen Erkenntnissen und Nuancen der rechtlichen und regulatorischen Aspekte bei. Angesichts der Verbreitung von Blockchain diskutieren wir aufkommende regulatorische Trends und Dynamiken in mehreren Ländern, die wirtschaftliche und administrative Veränderungen durch eine Konstellation von regulatorischen Erlassen vorantreiben und die schnelle Einführung der Blockchain-Technologie erleichtern. Darüber hinaus bieten wir eine umfassende Diskussion über die Grenzen, Barrieren und technologischen und rechtlichen Herausforderungen von Blockchain-fähigen Smart Contracts, die ein besonders vielversprechender Weg in der Kohlenstoffwirtschaft sind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
5 U.S.C. § 552 (2018)
8 Del. Code Ann. § 219 (2017)
8 Del. Code Ann. § 224 (2017)
8 Del. Code Ann. § 232 (2017)
11 V.S.A. § 4172 (2018)
11 V.S.A. § 4173 (2018)
42 U.S.C. § 7414(c) (2006)
Adaptation of Federal Law to Developments in Distributed Ledger Technology (2020)
Al-Abdullah M, Alsmadi I, AlAbdullah R, Farkas B (2020) Designing privacy-friendly data repositories: a framework for a blockchain that follows the GDPR. Digit Policy Regul Gov 22(5–6):389–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-04-2020-0050
Alkadi O, Moustafa N, Turnbull B (2020) A review of intrusion detection and blockchain applications in the cloud: approaches, challenges and solutions. IEEE Access 8:104893–104917. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999715
Andrews N, Brownsword R, Chuah J, Yihan G, Halson R, Khan A, Mik E, Stannard JE, Tolhurst GJ (2017) The law of contract (Common Law Series) (ed: Furmston M, Bd. 6). LexisNexis
AR Code § 25-32-122 (2019)
Arcari J (2018) Decoding smart contracts: technology, legitimacy, & legislative uniformity. Fordham J Corp Financ Law 24:363
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-7061 (2017)
Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd, EWHC 10 (2012)
Bacon J, Michels JD, Millard C, Singh J (2018) Blockchain demystified: a technical and legal introduction to distributed and centralized ledgers. Richmond J Law Technol 25:1
Blockchain Technology Act, 205 ILCS 730 (2019)
California Consumer Privacy Act, Cal. Legis. Serv. Ch. 55 (A.B. 375) (WEST) (2018)
California Privacy Rights Act (2020)
Carron B, Botteron V (2019) How smart can a contract be? In: Kraus D, Obrist T, Hari O (eds) Blockchains, smart contracts, decentralised autonomous organisations and the law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Gloucestershire, pp 101–143
Collins H (2003) The law of contract. Butterworths, London
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McDonnell, No. 18-CV-0361 (2018)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2019) CFTC, FinCEN, and SEC issue joint statement on activities involving digital assets. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/cftcfincensecjointstatement101119. Zugegriffen: 14. Juni 2022
Compagnucci MC, Fenwick M, Haapio H (2021) Digital technology, future lawyers and the computable contract designer of tomorrow. In: Research handbook on contract design. Edward Elgar Publishing, Gloucestershire, S 421–444
Corporations Code, Cal. Corp. Code § 204 (1975)
Council Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments, OJ L 173 (2014)
Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market (2017) Edited by European Parliament and the Council of the European Union
Crittenden C (2020) Blockchain in California: a roadmap. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2j9596dp. Zugegriffen: 20. Juli 2022
de Almeida L, Cappelli V, Klausmann N, van Soest H (2021) Peer-to-peer trading and energy community in the electricity market: analysing the literature on law and regulation and looking ahead to future challenges. International Energy Agency. Zugegriffen: 18. Juli 2022
Declaration of the Ministers of the Financial Action Task Force (2022) https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/FATF-Ministerial-Declaration-April-2022.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Aug 2022
Directive 2018/843 of 30 May 2018 on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (2018) Edited by European Parliament and the Council of the European Union
Djurovic M, Janssen A (2018) The formation of blockchain-based smart contracts in the light of contract law. Eur Rev Priv Law 26(6):753–771. https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2018053
Djurovic M, Janssen A (2019) The formation of smart contracts and beyond: shaking the fundamentals of contract law. In: DiMatteo LA, Cannarsa M, Poncibò C (eds) Smart contracts and blockchain technology: role of contract law. Cambridge University Press, UK
Duarte D (2019) An introduction to blockchain technology from a legal perspective and its tensions with the GDPR. Cyberlaw Journal of the Cyberlaw Research Centre of the University of Lisbon School of Law. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3545331
Earls J, Smith M, Smith R (2018) Smart contracts: is the law ready. https://digitalchamber.s3.amazonaws.com/Smart-Contracts-Whitepaper-WEB.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Aug 2022
Estonian blockchain technology (n. d.) https://e-estonia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020mar-nochanges-faq-a4-v03-blockchain-1-1.pdf. Zugegriffen: 14. Aug 2022
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (2017) Distributed ledger technology & cybersecurity − improving information security in the financial sector. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/blockchain-security. Zugegriffen: 25. Aug 2022
Federal Council of Switzerland (2018) Legal framework for distributed ledger technology and blockchain in Switzerland − an overview with a focus on the financial sector. https://www.newsd.admin.ch/newsd/message/attachments/55153.pdf. Zugegriffen: 25. Aug 2022
Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) (2019) Towards Secure Blockchains. https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Crypto/Secure_Blockchain.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3. Zugegriffen: 10. Juni 2022
Ferreira A (2020) Emerging regulatory approaches to blockchain based token economy. J Br Blockchain Assoc. https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-3-1-(6)2020
Ferreira A (2021) Regulating smart contracts: legal revolution or simply evolution? Telecommunications Policy 45(2):102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102081. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596120301713
Financial Services (Distributed Ledger Technology Providers) Regulations, LN.2020/012 (2020)
Florian M, Henningsen S, Beaucamp S, Scheuermann B (2019) Erasing data from blockchain nodes. In: 2019 IEEE European Symposium on security and privacy workshops, pp 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW.2019.00047
Flühmann D, Hsu P (2021) Switzerland: blockchain. https://www.baerkarrer.ch/en/publications/switzerland-blockchain. Zugegriffen: 10. Juni 2022
Forbes L (2022) Consumer protection in the face of smart contracts. Loyola Consum Law Rev 34(1)
Frommelt E (2020) Liability challenges in the blockchain ecosystem. UC Davis Bus Law J 21:165
Garcia J, Garcia J, Collado J (2022) Blockchain & cryptocurrency laws and regulations global legal insights. https://www.globallegalinsights.com/practice-areas/blockchain-laws-and-regulations/gibraltar. Zugegriffen: 8. Juni 2022
General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (2016)
Gibraltar Constitution Order (2006)
Giessen D (2019) Blockchain and the GDPR‘s right to erasure. University of Twente
Grennan J (2022) FinTech regulation in the United States: past, present, and future. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4045057
Guseva Y (2020) A conceptual framework for digital-asset securities: tokens and coins as debt and equity. Maryland Law Rev 80(1):166. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol80/iss1/7
Henly C, Hartnett S, Endemann B, Tejblum B, Cohen DS (2018) Energizing the future with blockchain. Energy Law J 39:197
Herian R (2021) Smart contracts: a remedial analysis. Infor Commun Technol Law 30(1):17–34
Hosmer H (1915) The tax situs of personal property. Louis Law Rev 1:320
Income Tax Act, LN.2010/180 (2010)
Innovative Technology Arrangements and Services Act (2018)
In Re Tezos Securities Litigation, No. 17-cv-06779-RS (2018)
In the Matter of: Coinflip, Inc., d/b/a Derivabit, and Francisco Riordan, CFTC Docket No. 15-29 (2015)
Joint Economic Committee (2018) Report of the Joint Economic Committee Congress of the United States on the 2018 Economic Report of the President. US Government Printing Office
Jones v Padavatton, 2 All ER 616 (1969)
Kaal, Wulf A. 2022. „Title.“ Available at SSRN
Kasatkina M (2021) Consumer protection in the light of smart contracts. ELTE Law J 1:95
Kuhn R, Yaga D, Voas J (2019) Rethinking distributed ledger technology. Comput Commun 52(2):68–72
Kulms R (2020) Blockchains: private law matters special feature. Singap J Leg Stud 2020:63
Lamdan SS (2014) Sunshine for sale: environmental contractors and the freedom of information act. Vermont Law Rev 15(2):227–261
Lee J, Khan VM (2020) Blockchain and smart contract for peer-to-peer energy trading platform: legal obstacles and regulatory solutions. UIC Rev Intellect Property Law 19(4):1
L’Estrange v F Graucob Ltd 2 KB 394 (1934)
Lima C (2018) Blockchain GDPR privacy by design. IEEE Blockchain Group. https://blockchain.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/blockchain-gdpr-privacy-by-design.pdf
Lombino C (2020) New privacy laws require changed operations on commercial websites. In: The LegalTech book: the legal technology handbook for investors, entrepreneurs and FinTech visionaries. Wiley, pp 78–82
Madir J (2018) Smart contracts: (how) do they fit under existing legal frameworks? https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301463
Malta Business Registry MBR (2022) https://www.legal-malta.com/articles/malta-business-registry-mbr. Zugegriffen: 14. Aug 2022
Malta Digital Innovation Authority Act, Act No. XXXI (2018)
Malta Financial Services Authority (n. d.) Guidance note to the financial instrument test. https://www.mfsa.mt/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/20190405_GuidanceFITest.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Aug 2022
Mason M, Gupta A (2015) Transparency. In: Research handbook on climate governance. Edward Elgar, Gloucestershire, pp 446–457
Mavridou A, Laszka A (2018) Designing secure ethereum smart contracts: a finite state machine based approach. In: International conference on financial cryptography and data security, pp 523–540
McKinney SA, Landy R, Wilka R (2017) Smart contracts, blockchain, and the next frontier of transactional law. Wash JL Tech Arts 13:313
Mendelson M (2019) From initial coin offerings to security tokens: a US Federal Securities law analysis. Stanford Technol Law Rev 22:52
Mik E (2017) Smart contracts: terminology, technical limitations and real world complexity. Law Innov Technol 9(2):269–300
Ministry for General Government Affairs and Finance (2018) Government consultation report on the creation of a law on transaction systems based on Trustworthy Technologies (TT). https://www.naegele.law/files/Downloads/2018-10-05-Unofficial-Translation-of-the-Draft-Blockchain-Act.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Aug 2022
Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, Decree of the President of the Republic No. 174 (2017)
Nagrani V (2020) Gibraltar: blockchain comparative guide. https://www.mondaq.com/gibraltar/technology/935292/blockchain-comparative-guide. Zugegriffen: 2. Mai 2022
Neitz MB (2021) How to regulate blockchain’s real-life applications: lessons from the California blockchain working group. Jurimetrics J 61:185–217
Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 719.045 (2019)
Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 78.0297 (2020)
NY State Tech L § 302 (2014)
OBG Limited and others v Allan, UKHL 21 (2007)
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National, EWHC 875 (2008)
Ohio Rev Code § 1306.06 (2013)
Park JJ (2018) When are tokens securities? Some questions from the perplexed. UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 18-13. Lowell Milken Institute Policy Report. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/12/20/when-are-tokens-securities-some-questions-from-the-perplexed/. Zugegriffen: 8. Aug 2022
Perez AJ, Zeadally S (2022) Secure and privacy-preserving crowdsensing using smart contracts: issues and solutions. Comp Sci Rev 43:100450
Politou E, Casino F, Alepis E, Patsakis C (2019) Blockchain mutability: challenges and proposed solutions. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2019.2949510
Praitheeshan P, Pan L, Yu J, Liu J, Doss R (2019) Security analysis methods on ethereum smart contract vulnerabilities: a survey. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1908.08605
Rühl G (2021) Smart (legal) contracts, or: which (contract) law for smart contracts? In: Cappiello B, Carullo G (eds) Blockchain, law and governance. Springer, Switzerland, pp 159–180
Saad M, Spaulding J, Njilla L, Kamhoua C, Shetty S, Nyang DH, Mohaisen D (2020) Exploring the attack surface of blockchain: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 22(3):1977–2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.2975999
Samreen NF, Alalfi MH (2020) Reentrancy vulnerability identification in Ethereum smart contracts. 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE)
Savelyev A (2017) Contract law 2.0: ‚smart‘ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law. Inf Commu Technol law 26(2):116–134
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946)
Shaw SLK (2009) Conversion of intangible property: a modest, but principled extension? A historical perspective. Victoria Univ Wellington Law Rev 40(2):419–440
Simmons A (2021) Regulating Libra: will legal and regulatory uncertainty prevent the launch of Facebook’s cryptocurrency project? J Bus Technol Law 16:83. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl/vol16/iss1/4
Sklaroff JM (2017) Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev 166:263. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=prize_papers
Solodan K (2019) Legal regulation of cryptocurrency taxation in European countries. Eur J Law Public Adm 6(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/64
Spafford ML, Stanaway DF, Chung S (2019) Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: a cross-border conundrum. J Invest Compliance 20(3):10–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOIC-05-2019-0027
Szabo N (1996) Nick Szabo–Smart contracts: building blocks for digital markets. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_2.html
Tai ETT (2018) Force majeure and excuses in smart contracts. Eur Rev Priv Law 26(6)
Tatar U, Gokce Y, Nussbaum B (2020) Law versus technology: blockchain, GDPR, and tough tradeoffs. Comput Law Secur Rev 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105454
Temte MN (2019) Blockchain challenges traditional contract law: just how smart are smart contracts. Wyoming Law Rev 19:87
TN Code § 47-10-201 (2019)
Token- und VT-Dienstleister-Gesetz, No. 301 (2019)
Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Directive (1993) Edited by European Parliament and the Council of the European Union
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2019) Framework for „investment contract“ analysis of digital assets. https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/framework-investment-contract-analysis-digital-assets#_edn1. Zugegriffen: 25. Aug 2022
Vermont Rules of Evidence 902 (1983)
Virtual Financial Assets Act (2018)
Waite JB (1918) Performance of an existing obligation as consideration for a promise. University of Michigan Law School. https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/903
Wang S, Yuan Y, Wang X, Li J, Qin R, Wang F-W (2018) An overview of smart contract: architecture, applications, and future trends. 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
Werbach K, Cornell N (2017) Contracts ex machina. Duke Law J 67:313
Wilmarth AE (2021) It’s time to regulate stablecoins as deposits and require their issuers to be FDIC-insured banks. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2022-01. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4000795. Zugegriffen: 25. Aug 2022
Woodburn J (1982) Egalitarian societies. Roy Anthropol Inst Great Br Irel 17(3):431–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801707
Wyo. Stat. § 34-29-103 (2019)
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 17-4-206(a) (2018)
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 17-16-625 (2019)
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 17-16-1601 (2018)
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 34-29-106 (2017)
Xu S, Ning J, Ma J, Huang X, Deng RH (2021) K-time modifiable and epoch-based redactable blockchain. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur Commun Netw 16:4507–4520. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2021.3107146
Yaga D, Mell P, Roby N, Scarfone K (2018) Blockchain Technology Overview. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2018/nist.ir.8202.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. Juni 2022
Your Response Ltd v Datateam Business Media Ltd, EWCA Civ 281 (2014)
Zetzsche DA, Buckley RP, Arner DW (2019) Regulating LIBRA: the transformative potential of Facebook’s cryptocurrency and possible regulatory responses. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2019/042
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karisma, K., Moslemzadeh Tehrani, P. (2024). Blockchain: Rechtliche und regulatorische Fragen. In: Nachhaltiges Öl und Gas mit Blockchain. Springer Vieweg, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45842-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45842-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45841-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45842-2
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)