Abstract
This chapter explores the ongoing debate between the gendered paradigm and the family violence paradigm in explaining the etiology of intimate partner violence (IPV). The gendered paradigm of IPV typically argues that violence occurs as an expression of power and control to exert patriarchal norms that clearly delineates an aggressor (man) and victim (woman) binary. The family violence paradigm advances social learning models as necessary to understanding the development of IPV, not as an expression of patriarchy, but from how behavior and the relationship to feelings are learned. Given that research has pointed toward comparable rates of IPV occurring across gender and sexual identity, a new theoretical model is needed to better understand how and why people use violence in navigating their intimate relationships. Building on these approaches, we introduce a novel paradigm rooted in queer theory to improve our understanding of who, how, and why people from diverse sexuality and gender backgrounds engage in IPV. This queer paradigm of IPV deconstructs the aggressor –>victim binary presented in the gendered paradigm to reveal the ways in which individuals can draw on their own agency to redraw their relationships with emotions to reduce instances of IPV.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
Baker, N. L., Buick, J. D., Kim, S. R., Moniz, S., & Nava, K. L. (2013). Lessons from examining same-sex intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 69(3), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0218-3
Berlant, L., & Freeman, E. (1993). Queer nationality. In M. Warner (Ed.), Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory (pp. 193–229). University of Minnesota Press.
Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18–32). Sage.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
Buttell, F., & Starr, E. (2013). Lifting the veil: Foundations for a gender-inclusive paradigm of intimate partner violence. In B. Russell (Ed.), Perceptions of female offenders: How stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses (pp. 117–132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5
Buttell, F. P., Powers, D., & Wong, A. (2012). Evaluating predictors of program attrition among women mandated into batterer intervention treatment. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(1), 20–28.
Cannon, C. (2019). What services exist for LGBTQ perpetrators of IPV in batterer intervention programs across North America? A qualitative study. Partner Abuse, 10(2), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.10.2.222
Cannon, C. (2020a). On the importance of feminist theories: Gender, race, sexuality and IPV. In B. Russell (Ed.), Intimate partner violence and the LGBT+ community: Understanding power dynamics (pp. 37–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44762-5
Cannon, C. (2020b). Learning what you need: Modifying treatment programs for LGBTQ perpetrators of IPV. In B. Russell (Ed.), Intimate partner violence and the LGBT+ community: Understanding power dynamics (pp. 177–193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44762-5
Cannon, C., & Buttell, F. (2015). Illusion of inclusion: The failure of the gender paradigm to account for intimate partner violence in LGBT relationships. Partner Abuse, 6(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.1.65
Cannon, C., & Buttell, F. (2016a). Policy discussions on LGBTQ intimate partner violence in North America. In R. Laratta (Ed.), An analysis of contemporary social welfare issues (pp. 5–12). InTech Open). https://doi.org/10.5772/62677
Cannon, C., & Buttell, F. (2016b). Pushing the paradigm: Addressing controversies over LGBTQ intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 967–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9900-5
Cannon, C., & Buttell, F. (2020). Research-supported recommendations for treating LGBTQ perpetrators of IPV: Implications for policy and practice. Partner Abuse, 11(4), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2020-0025
Cannon, C., & Ferreira, R. J. (2017). Understanding female intimate partner violence perpetration, parenting attitudes, and batterer intervention program completion. Partner Abuse, 8(3), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.8.3.272
Cannon, C., Lauve-Moon, K., & Buttell, F. (2015). Re-theorizing intimate partner violence through post-structural feminism, queer theory, and the sociology of gender. Social Sciences, 4(3), 668–687. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4030668
Cannon, C., Hamel, J., Buttell, F. P., & Ferreira, R. J. (2016). A survey of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the United States and Canada: Findings and implications for policy and intervention. Partner Abuse, 7(3), 226–276. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.3.226
Cannon, C., Ferreira, R. J., & Buttell, F. (2019). Differences and similarities between male and female intimate partner violence perpetration and parenting attitudes. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 16(4), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2019.1625094
Cannon, C., Corvo, K., Buttell, F., & Hamel, J. (2020a). Barriers to advancing evidence-based practice in domestic violence perpetrator treatment in the United States: Ideology, public funding, or both? Partner Abuse, 12(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2020-0008
Cannon, C., Hamel, J., Buttell, F., & Ferreira, R. (2020b). The pursuit of research-supported treatment in batterer intervention: The role of professional licensure and theoretical orientation for Duluth and CBT programs. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 17(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2020.1775744
Cantos, A. L., & O’Leary, K. D. (2014). One size does not fit all in treatment of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 5(2), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.5.2.204
Carney, M. M., & Buttell, F. P. (2004). A multidimensional evaluation of a treatment program for female batterers: A pilot study. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(4), 249–258.
Carney, M., Buttell, F., & Dutton, D. (2007). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.002
Coleman, V. E. (2003). Treating the lesbian batterer: Theoretical and clinical considerations A contemporary psychoanalytic perspective. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 7(1–2), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v07n01_08
Condino, V., Tanzilli, A., Speranza, A. M., & Lingiardi, V. (2016). Therapeutic interventions in intimate partner violence: An overview. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2016.241
Cross, T. P., Mathews, B., Tonmyr, L., Scott, D., & Ouimet, C. (2012). Child welfare policy and practice on children’s exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(3), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.11.004
DeKeseredy, W. S. (1988). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The relevance of social support theory. Journal of Family Violence, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994662
Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships: Part 2. Rates of male and female perpetration. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 170–198.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy (pp. 179–206). Free Press.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71–91.
Dragiewicz, M., & Lindgren, Y. (2009). The gendered nature of domestic violence: Statistical data for lawyers considering equal protection analysis. The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, & the Law, 17(2), 229–268.
Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 680–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.02.001
Dutton, D. G., & White, K. R. (2013). Male victims of domestic violence. New Male Studies: An International Journal, 2(1), 5–17.
Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C., Black, D., & Suhr, L. (2006). Intervention programs for perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Conclusions from a clinical research perspective. Public Health Reports, 121(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490612100405
Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C. M., Whitaker, D. J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4(2), 196–231. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.2.196
Ferreira, R. J., & Buttell, F. P. (2016). Can a “psychosocial model” help explain violence perpetrated by female batterers? Research on Social Work Practice, 26(4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514543665
Ferreira, R. J., Lauve-Moon, K., & Cannon, C. (2017). Male batterer parenting attitudes: Investigating differences between African American and Caucasian men. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(5), 572–581.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Volume 1, an introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Random House, Inc.
Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cwb00
Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11sn283
Halperin, D. M. (1990). One hundred years of homosexuality: And other essays on Greek love (New Ancient World Series). Routledge.
Halpern, C. T., Young, M. L., Waller, M. W., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2004). Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.003
Hamel, J., Cannon, C., Buttell, F., & Ferreira, R. (2020). A survey of IPV perpetrator treatment providers: Ready for evidence-based practice? Partner Abuse, 11(4), 387–414. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2020-0024
Jagose, A. (1997). Queer theory: An introduction. New York University Press.
Kernsmith, P., & Kernsmith, R. (2009). Treating female perpetrators: State standards for batterer intervention services. Social Work, 54(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/54.4.341
Kitzmann, K. M., Gaylord, N. K., Holt, A. R., & Kenny, E. D. (2003). Child witnesses to domestic violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 339–352.
Klostermann, K., Kelley, M. L., Milletich, R. J., & Mignone, T. (2011). Alcoholism and partner aggression among gay and lesbian couples. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(2), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.01.002
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9628-2
Lewis, R. J., Milletich, R. J., Kelley, M. L., & Woody, A. (2012). Minority stress, substance use, and intimate partner violence among sexual minority women. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.004
Lewis, D. C., Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Miller, P. R., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2017). Degrees of acceptance: Variation in public attitudes toward segments of the LGBT community. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1065912917717352
Messinger, A. M. (2011). Invisible victims: Same-sex IPV in the national violence against women survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2228–2243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0886260510383023
Pence, E., Paymar, M., & Ritmeester, T. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826179913
Pfeffer, C. A. (2014). “I don’t like passing as a straight woman”: Queer negotiations of identity and social group membership. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 1–44. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1086/677197
Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. University of California Press.
Seidman, S. (Ed.). (1996). Queer theory/sociology. Blackwell.
Storey, J. E., & Strand, S. (2012). The characteristics and violence risk management of women arrested by the police for intimate partner violence. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1477370812453403
Straus, M. A. (2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.010
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Fast facts: Intimate partner violence. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/fastfact.html
Warner, M. (Ed.). (1993). Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. University of Minnesota Press.
West, C. M. (2012). Partner abuse in ethnic minority and gay, lesbian bisexual, and transgender populations. Partner Abuse, 3(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.3.336
White, K. R., & Dutton, D. G. (2013). Perceptions of female perpetrators. In B. Russell (Ed.), Perceptions of female offenders: How stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses (pp. 101–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5
Winstok, Z. (2011). The paradigmatic cleavage on gender differences in partner violence perpetration and victimization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cannon, C.E.B., Buttell, F. (2023). A Gender Inclusive Paradigm for Domestic Violence Offenders. In: Russell, B., Torres, C. (eds) Perceptions of Female Offenders, Vol. 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45685-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45685-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45684-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45685-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)