Skip to main content

Normalizing Digitization Into a New 5.0 Equilibrium. Insights from Socio-Ecological Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Innovation Forum 2023 (RIIFORUM 2023)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 258 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses digitalization as a megatrend that gave rise to a deeper discontinuity with previous social, economic, and environmental patterns. In line with this perspective, managerial literature largely framed the fifth industrial revolution as a new paradigm able to break down barriers, thanks to digital technology, between the real and virtual world. Firm, institutions, and decision-makers are key actors in triggering or resisting the ongoing transformation. In this direction, the paper aims to look beyond economic and technological aspects of the fifth industrial revolution and to consider it as part of a wider socio-ecological adjustment, by adopting a socio-ecological perspective. The study is rooted on theoretical concepts and it provides a conceptual study, through which the fifth industrial revolution appears as a 4.0-based adjustment. In this perspective, Industry 5.0 could present both implications and challenges for societies and firms. On one hand, it contributes to the improvement of sustainability and the increase of customization; on the other hand, it requires particular attention to data management and security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuhn, B.M., Margellos, D.L.: Global perspectives on Megatrends. Ibidem, Hannover (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carayannis, E.G., Morawska-Jancelewicz, J.: The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. J. Knowl. Econ. 13:3445–3471 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Serpa, S., Ferreira, C.M.: Society 5.0 and sustainability digital innovations: a social process. J. Organ. Cult. Commun. Conflicts 23(1), 1–14 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breque, M., De Nul, L., Petridis, A.: Industry 5.0, towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. In: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morawska-Jancelewicz, J.: The role of universities in social innovation within quadruple/quintuple helix model: practical implications from polish experience. J. Knowl. Econ. 13(3), 2230–2271 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., Sułkowski, Ł: The motivation of academics in remote teaching during the covid-19 pandemic in polish universities—opening the debate on a new equilibrium in e-learning. Sustainability 13(5), 2752 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holling, C.S.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., Rockström, J.: Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc. 15(4), 1–9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reyers, B., Moore, M.L., Haider, L.J., Schlüter, M.: The contributions of resilience to reshaping sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 5, 657–664 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L.: Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—inception, conception and perception. J. Manuf. Syst. 61, 530–535 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lim, W.M., Ciasullo, M.V., Douglas, A., Kumar, S.: Environmental social governance (ESG) and total quality management (TQM): a multi-study meta-systematic review. In: Total Quality Management and Business Excellence (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, T.M., Kumar, S., Yue, X., Chan, H.L.: Disruptive technologies and operations management in the Industry 4.0 era and beyond. Prod. Oper. Manage. 31(1), 9–31 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Felice, F., Travaglioni, M., Petrillo, A.: Innovation trajectories for a Society 5.0. Data 6(11), 115 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J.: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Rep. Ind. 4, 82 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M.: Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6, 239–242 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kong, X.T., Luo, H., Huang, G.Q., Yang, X.: Industrial wearable system: the human-centric empowering technology in Industry 4.0. J. Intell. Manuf. 30, 2853–2869 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohamed, M.: Challenges and benefits of Industry 4.0: an overview. Int. J. Supply Oper. Manage. 5(3), 256–265 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tirabeni, L., de Bernardi, P., Forliano, C., Franco, M.: How can organisations and business models lead to a more sustainable society? A framework from a systematic review of the Industry 4.0. Sustainability 11, 6363 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu, Y.: The current status and developing trends of Industry 4.0: a review. Inf. Syst. Front., pp. 1–20 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., Straka, M.: Identification of social and economic expectations: contextual reasons for the transformation process of Industry 4.0 into the Industry 5.0 concept. Sustainability 14(3), 1391 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nara, E.O.B., da Costa, M.B., Baierle, I.C., Schaefer, J.L., Benitez, G.B., do Santos, L.M.A.L., Benitez, L.B.: Expected impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on sustainable development: a study in the context of Brazil’s plastic industry. Sustain. Prod. Consumption 25, 102–122 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Friedman, B., Hendry, D.G.: Value sensitive design: shaping technology with moral imagination. MIT Press, Cambridge (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., Wang, L., et al.: Industry 5.0: prospect and retrospect. J. Manuf. Syst. 65, 279–295 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Crutzen, P.J.: The Anthropocene: the current human-dominated geological era. Pontifical Acad. Sci. Acta 18, 199–293 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kalisch, R., Cramer, A.O., Binder, H., Fritz, J., Leertouwer, I., Lunansky, G., Van Harmelen, A.L., et al.: Deconstructing and reconstructing resilience: a dynamic network approach. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14(5), 765–777 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carpenter, S.R., Arrow, K.J., Barrett, S., Biggs, R., Brock, W.A., Crépin, A.S., De Zeeuw, A., et al.: General resilience to cope with extreme events. Sustainability 4(12), 3248–3259 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Adger, W.N.: Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog. Hum. Geogr. 24(3), 347–364 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ostrom, E.: A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939), 419–422 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Walker, B., Salt, D.: Resilience practice. Island Press, Washington DC (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (eds.): Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., Schoon, M.L.: An introduction to the resilience approach and principles to sustain ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. In: Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social–Ecological Systems, pp. 1–31 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scott, W.R.: Institutional theory: contributing to a theoretical research program. Great Mind. Manage. Process Theory Dev. 37(2), 460–484 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Balkundi, P., Kilduff, M.: The ties that lead: a social network approach to leadership. Leadersh. Q. 17(4), 419–439 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahneman, T., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Burt, R.S.: Structural holes capstone, cautions, and enthusiasms. In: Personal Networks: Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis, pp. 384–416 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moser, S., Meerow, S., Arnott, J., Jack-Scott, E.: The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue. Clim. Change 153(1–2), 21–40 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Barile, S., Simone, C., La Sala, A., Conti, M.E.: Surfing the complex interaction between new technology and norms: a resistance or resilience issue? Insights by the viable system approach (VSA). Acta Europeana Systemica 9, 93–104 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dragoicea, M., Polese, F., Carrubbo, L., Walletzký, L.: Why service science matters in approaching a “resilient” society. In: ITM Web of Conferences, IESS 2.1, vol. 38, pp. 02001-1–02001-18 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zolli, A., Healy, A.M.: Resilience: why things bounce back. Hachette UK (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. La Sala, A.: Resilience in complex socio-organizational systems. From the state-of-the-art to an empirical proposal. Edizioni Nuova Cultura, Roma (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Manca, A.R., Benczur, P., Giovannini, E.: Building a scientific narrative towards a more resilient EU society. In: JRC Science for Policy Report. Artificial Intelligence: Ethics, Governance and Policy Challenges, vol. 137 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Walletzký, L., Carrubbo, L., Badr, G.N., Dragoicea, M., Toli, A.M., Basawi, S.: Reconfiguring the service system for resilience: lessons learned in the higher education context. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. (2023). ISSN 0885–8624

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ciasullo, M.V., Polese, F., Montera, R., Carrubbo, L.: A digital servitization framework for viable manufacturing companies. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 36(13), 142–160 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gilson, L.L., Goldberg, C.B.: Editors’ comment: so, what is a conceptual paper? Group Org. Manag. 40, 127–130 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jaakkola, E.: Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Rev. 10, 18–26 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Petticrew, M., Roberts, H.: Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Wiley, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Floridi, L.: La quarta rivoluzione: come l’infosfera sta trasformando il mondo. Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriana Ferrara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ciasullo, M.V., La Sala, A., Ferrara, M. (2024). Normalizing Digitization Into a New 5.0 Equilibrium. Insights from Socio-Ecological Systems. In: Visvizi, A., Troisi, O., Corvello, V. (eds) Research and Innovation Forum 2023. RIIFORUM 2023. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44721-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics