Skip to main content

Exploring Factors Influencing Firm Profitability: The Case of the Meat Industry in Portugal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Management, Tourism and Smart Technologies (ICMTT 2023)

Abstract

The study examines the profitability of the meat industry in Portugal and its determining factors. Annual financial data of the Portuguese firms are collected from the database Analysis System of Iberian Balance Sheets from 2014 to 2020. Based on 1,631 observations, one dependent variable and four groups of independent variables are tested using estimation methods, i.e., Pooled Ordinary Least Square and Fixed Effects and Generalised Method of Moments. The empirical evidence shows that firm size and tangible assets have significant impacts on firm profitability. Besides, profitability is persistent, implying that the continuous nature of profitability over time provides a firm with an advantage in capturing new opportunities to improve its performance. However, external factors show no effects on firm profitability. In general, the capability to manage assets and liabilities flexibly is highly related to profitability, enabling the firms to prosper after the financial crisis. Therefore, the paper provides useful information for stakeholders in considering solutions to improve firms´ resilience and profitability while facing unfavourable economic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission: Statistical Factsheet Portugal: Agriculture and Rural Development (2021).  https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/agri-statistical-factsheet-pt_en.pdf, Accessed 15 June 2022

  2. Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE), at https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&userLoadSave=Load&userTableOrder=178&tipoSeleccao=1&contexto=pq&selTab=tab1&submitLoad=true&xlang=pt, Accessed 15 June 2022

  3. Nunes, P.M., Serrasqueiro, Z.: Profitability determinants of Portuguese knowledge-intensive business services: empirical evidence using panel data models. Appl. Econ. Lett. 22(1), 51–56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2014.925041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vătavu, S.: The impact of capital structure on financial performance in Romanian listed companies. Proc. Econ. Finance 32(15), 1314–1322 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01508-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dahiyat, A.A., Weshah, S.R., Aldahiyat, M.: Liquidity and solvency management and its impact on financial performance : empirical evidence from jordan. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 8(5), 135–141 (2021). https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santos, E., Lisboa, I.,  Eugénio, T.: The financial performance of family versus non-family firms operating in nautical tourism. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14(3) (2022).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031693

  7. Branco, C., Domingues, T., Martins, A.: The Determinants of TFP Growth in the Portuguese Service Sector (2018).  https://www.gee.gov.pt/RePEc/WorkingPapers/GEE_PAPERS_114.pdf, Accessed 15 June 2022

  8. Vu, H.C., Phi, T.V., Dang, T.B.: The impact of firm size on the performance of Vietnamese private enterprises: a case study. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 19(2), 243–250 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vo, D.H., Nguyen, T.M.: The impact of corporate governance on firm performance: empirical study in Vietnam. Int. J. Econ. Financ. 6(6), 1–13 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n6p1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grazzi, M., Moschella, D.: Small, young, and exporters: new evidence on the determinants of firm growth. J. Evol. Econ. 28(1), 125–152 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsiapa, M.: Performance of large firms in Greece during the unstable period of 2011–2016: lessons from the weak parts of Europe. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ. 31(1), 94–114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-06-2019-0109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen, P.A., Nguyen, H.A., Ngo, T., Nguyen, P.V.: The relationship between productivity and firm’s performance: evidence from listed firms in Vietnam stock exchange. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 6(3), 131–140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no3.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemonakis, C., Vassakis, K., Zopounidis, C., Voulgaris, F.: Efficiency, competitiveness and exports of agricultural firms in the post-crisis era: evidence from Greece. Inter. J. Soc. Syst. Sci. 8(1), 14–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsss.2016.076006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Serrasqueiro, Z.S., Nunes, P.M.: Determinants of growth in Portuguese small and medium-sized hotels: Empirical evidence using panel data models. Tour. Econ. 22(2), 375–396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chun, H., Nadiri, M.I.: Intangible investment and changing sources of growth in Korea. Japanese Econ. Rev. 67(1), 50–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jere.12079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsiao, Y.C., Lo, M.L., Lin, C.L., Lin, H.L.: Portfolio of intangible investments and production and innovation performance: evidence from taiwanese manufacturing firms. Asian Econ. J. 35(4), 345–362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunes, P. M., Serrasqueiro, Z., Leitão, J.: Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs. high-tech SMEs. Res. Policy 41(1), 36–53 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.011

  18. Bhattacharya, A., Morgan, N.A., Rego, L.L.: Examining why and when market share drives firm profit. J. Mark. 86(4), 73–94 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211031922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Edeling, A., Himme, A.: When does market share matter? new empirical generalizations from a meta-analysis of the market share-performance relationship. J. Mark. 82(3), 1–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.16.0250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cin, B.C., Kim, Y.J., Vonortas, N.S.: The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from Korean SMEs. Small Bus. Econ. 48(2), 345–360 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9786-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, M., Liu, L., Xu, S., Du, M., Liu, X., Zhang, Y.: The influences of government subsidies on performance of new energy firms: a firm heterogeneity perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(17) (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174518

  22. Söderblom, A., Samuelsson, M., Wirlund, J., Sandberg, R.: Inside the black box of outcome additionality: effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance. Res. Policy 44(8), 1501–1512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Assagaf, A., Yusoff, Y.M., Hassan, R.: Government subsidy, strategic profitability and its impact on financial performance: empirical evidence from Indonesia. Investm.Manag. Financ. Innov. 14(3), 135–147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3).2017.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bu, D., Zhang, C., Wang, X.: Purposes of government subsidy and firm performance. China J. Account. Stud. 5(1), 100–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2017.1292730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Egbunike, C.F., Okerekeoti, C.U.: Macroeconomic factors, firm characteristics and financial performance: a study of selected quoted manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Asian J. Account. Res. 3(2), 142–168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2018-0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghareli, S., Mohammadi, A.: A study on the effect of macroeconomic variables and firm characteristics on the quality of financial reporting of listed firms in tehran stock exchange. J. Fund. Appli. Sci. 8(2), 1777 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v8i2s.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yüksel, S., Muhktarov, S., Mammadov, E., Özsan, M.: Determinants of profitability in the banking sector: an analysis of post-Soviet countries. Economies 6(3) (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6030041

  28. The World Bank: Annual GDP Growth – Portugal (2022). In: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2020&locations=PT&start=2010, Accessed 21 July 2022

  29. Arellano, M., Bond, S.: Some tests of specification for panel data:monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58(2), 277–297 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nunes, P.J., Serrasqueiro, Z.M., Sequeira, T.N.: Profitability in Portuguese service industries: a panel data approach. Serv. Ind. J. 29(5), 693–707 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902720188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wooldridge, J.M.: Introductory Econometrics A Modern Approach 5th edn. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roodman, D.: How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J.  9(1), 86–136 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnston, R., Jones, K., Manley, D.: Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour. Qual. Quant. 52(6), 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bond, S.S., Hoeffler, A., Temple, J.: GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models. Economics Papers (01), No 2001-W21, Nuffield College, University of Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lopez-Valeiras, E., Gomez-Conde, J., Fernandez-Rodriguez, T.: Firm size and financial performance: intermediate effects of indebtedness. Agribusiness 32(4), 454–465 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shehata, N., Salhin, A., El-Helaly, M.: Board diversity and firm performance: evidence from the U.K. SMEs. Appli. Econ. 49(48), 4817–4832 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1293796

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out within the scope of the project “BIOMA - Soluções Integradas de Bioeconomia para a Mobilização da Cadeia Agroalimentar (POCI-01–0247-FEDER-046112)”, financed by the “Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER)” through the “Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI)”; and Applied Management Research Unit (UNIAG), R&D unit funded by the FCT – Portuguese Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education. “Project Code Reference: UIDB/04752/2020”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Le Quyen Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, L.Q. et al. (2024). Exploring Factors Influencing Firm Profitability: The Case of the Meat Industry in Portugal. In: Montenegro, C., Rocha, Á., Cueva Lovelle, J.M. (eds) Management, Tourism and Smart Technologies. ICMTT 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 773. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44131-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics