Abstract
The bioenergy production from alternative sources such as biomass has been leading to an increase of biomass fly ash (BFA) that need proper management. In this study, the performance and optimization of the biochemical methane potential of tomato residues were studied through the addition of BFA. The results demonstrated that higher methane production can be achieved when BFA is added in the concentration of 2500 and 10,000 mg/L instead of the use of a synthetic nutrient medium. The optimization of the substrate-to-inoculum ratio (SIR) and the BFA concentration demonstrated that a higher SIR can be applied in the reactor due to the higher buffering capacity of the system, which allows the digestion of higher substrate quantities. The optimum conditions determined were a SIR equal to 1.0 and a BFA concentration of 5000 mg/L. Moreover, the kinetic study revealed that the BFA can be added to the anaerobic digestion process without compromising the rate of biogas formation. Overall, this study demonstrated that biomass fly ash can act as a buffering agent as well as a nutrient supplier in the anaerobic digestion process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alavi-Borazjani SA, Tarelho LAC, Capela I (2021) A brief overview on the utilization of biomass ash in biogas production and purification. Waste Biomass Valoriz 12:6375–6388
Almeida PV, Rodrigues RP, Gaspar MC, Braga MEM, Quina MJ (2021a) Integrated management of residues from tomato production: recovery of value-added compounds and biogas production in the biorefinery context. J Environ Manag 299:113505
Almeida PV, Rodrigues RP, Teixeira LM, Santos AF, Martins RC, Quina MJ (2021b) Bioenergy production through mono and co-digestion of tomato residues. Energies 14:5563
Almeida PV, Rodrigues RP, Slezak R, Quina MJ (2022) Assessment of NIR spectroscopy for predicting biochemical methane potential of agro-residues—a biorefinery approach. Biomass Bioenergy 151:106169
Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, Kalyuzhnyi S, Jenicek P, Van Lier JB (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59:927–934
Browne JD, Murphy JD (2013) Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste. Appl Energy 104:170–177
Gaspar MC, Mendes CVT, Pinela S, Moreira R, Carvalho MGVS, Quina MJ, Braga MEM, Portugal A (2019) Assessment of agroforestry residues: their potential within the biorefinery context. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:17154–17165
Jain S, Jain S, Wolf IT, Lee J, Tong YW (2015) A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:142–154
Podmirseg SM, Seewald MSA, Knapp BA, Bouzid O, Biderre-Petit C, Peyret P, Insam H (2013) Wood ash amendment to biogas reactors as an alternative to landfilling? A preliminary study on changes in process chemistry and biology. Waste Manag Res 31:829–842
Rodrigues RP, Klepacz-Smolka A, Martins R, Quina M (2019) Comparative analysis of methods and models for predicting biochemical methane potential of various organic substrates. Sci Total Environ 649:1599–1608
Rodrigues RP, Gando-Ferreira LM, Quina MJ (2022) Increasing value of winery residues through integrated biorefinery processes: a review. Molecules 27:4709
Takashima M, Speece RE, Parkin GF (2009) Mineral requirements for methane fermentation. Crit Rev Environ Control 19:465–479
Xiao Q, Chen W, Tian D, Shen F, Hu J, Long L, Zeng Y, Yang G, Deng S (2020) Integrating the bottom ash residue from biomass power generation into anaerobic digestion to improve biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuels 34:1101–1110
Xiao Q, Hu J, Huang M, Shen F, Tian F, Zeng Y, Jang M-K (2021) Valorizing the waste bottom ash for improving anaerobic digestion performances towards a “Win-Win” strategy between biomass power generation and biomethane production”. J Clean Prod 295:126508
Zhang C, Su H, Baeyens J, Tan T (2014) Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renew Sustain Energy 38:383–392
Acknowledgements
R.P. Rodrigues acknowledges the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) for the Ph.D. grant (SFRH/BD/145694/2019) and the fellowship from the project MATIS, Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER), através do Programa Operacional Regional do Centro (CENTRO2020) CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000014. Thanks are due to the Strategic Project of CIEPQPF (UIDB/00102/2020), financed by FCT through national funds. P.V. Almeida acknowledges the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) for the Ph.D. grant (2020.08445.BD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodrigues, R.P., Almeida, P.V., Martinho, C.M.O., Gando-Ferreira, L.M., Quina, M.J. (2023). Biochemical Methane Potential Enhancement Through Biomass Fly Ash Addition. In: Caetano, N.S., Felgueiras, M.C. (eds) The 9th International Conference on Energy and Environment Research. ICEER 2022. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43559-1_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43559-1_62
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43558-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43559-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)