Skip to main content

Identification of Benign Tumor Masses Using Deep Learning Techniques Based on Semantic Segmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Intelligence (IWANN 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14134))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 501 Accesses

Abstract

Ovarian tumors affect women of all ages and the main challenge for optimal therapeutic management is to determine whether there is a benign or malignant tumor. The main imagistic tool for the evaluation of ovarian tumors is pelvic ultrasonography. To support the diagnosis of clinicians several artificial intelligence applications and ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis systems are emerging in recent years. This paper covers a comparative study between different convolutional neural networks based on semantic segmentation, implemented, and proposed for the identification of four benign ovarian tumor masses (chocolate cyst, mucinous cystadenoma, teratoma, and simple cyst). The semantic segmentation networks used in our comparative study are based on DeepLab-V3+ networks with 5 different encoders and a fully convolutional network. The scope of this study is to present the performances of each network for each of the covered benign classes and to illustrate the ones with the best performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 72(1), 7–33 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeppernick, F., Meinhold-Heerlein, I., Meinhold-Heerlein, Á.I.: The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Arch. Gynecol Obs. 290(5), 839–842 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basha, M.A.A., Metwally, M.I., Gamil, S.A., et al.: Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses. Eur. Radiol. 31(2), 674–684 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sokalska, A., et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 34(4), 462–470 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, C., Wang, Y., Wang, F.: Deep learning for ovarian tumor classification with ultrasound images. In: Hong, R., Cheng, W.-H., Yamasaki, T., Wang, M., Ngo, C.-W. (eds.) PCM 2018. LNCS, vol. 11166, pp. 395–406. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00764-5_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, H., et al.: Application of deep convolutional neural networks for discriminating benign, borderline, and malignant serous ovarian tumors from ultrasound images. Front Oncol. 11, 770683 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu, S.T., Su, Y.J., Hung, C.H., Chen, M.J., Lu, C.H., Kuo, C.E.: Automatic ovarian tumors recognition system based on ensemble convolutional neural network with ultrasound imaging. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 22(1), 298 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen, F., Epstein, E.L., Smedberg, E., Åkerlund, M., Smith, K., Epstein, E.: Ultrasound image analysis using deep neural networks for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors: comparison with expert subjective assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 57(1), 155–163 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saida, T., et al.: Diagnosing ovarian cancer on MRI: a preliminary study comparing deep learning and radiologist assessments. Cancers (Basel). 14(4), 987 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung, Y., et al.: Ovarian tumor diagnosis using deep convolutional neural networks and a denoising convolutional autoencoder. Sci. Rep. 12, 17024 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pavlik, E.J., et al.: Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 122(2 Pt 1), 210–217 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stany, M.P., Hamilton, C.A.: Benign disorders of the ovary. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 35(2), 271–284 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Louis, M.S., Mangal, R., Stead, T.S., Sosa, M., Ganti, L.: Ovarian dermoid tumor. Cureus, 14(7), e27233 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moyon, M.A., et al.: Giant ovarian mucinous cystadenoma, a challenging situation in resource-limited countries. J. Surg. Case Rep. (12), rjz366 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vercellini, P., Viganò, P., Somigliana, E., Fedele, L.: Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 10(5), 261–275 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Holsbeke, C., Van Calster, B., Guerriero, S., et al.: Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 35(6), 730–740 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. https://github.com/cv516buaa/mmotu_ds2net. Accessed 21 Jan 2023

  18. Zhao, Q., et al.: A multi-modality ovarian tumor ultrasound image dataset for unsupervised cross-domain semantic segmentation. arXiv: 2207.06799 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 34313440. June 7–12, Boston, MA, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., Adam, H.: Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In: Ferrari V., Hebert M., Sminchisescu C., Weiss Y. (eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2018. ECCV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11211 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. El-Khatib, M., Teodor, O., Popescu, D., Ichim, L.: Using combined CNNs for ROI segmentation in early investigation of pregnancy. In: 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), pp. 897902. May 17–20, Istanbul, Turkey (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Howard, A.G., et al.: MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv: 1704.04861 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Popescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

El-Khatib, M., Teodor, O.M., Popescu, D., Ichim, L. (2023). Identification of Benign Tumor Masses Using Deep Learning Techniques Based on Semantic Segmentation. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Catala, A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IWANN 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43085-5_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43085-5_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43084-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43085-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics