Abstract
Whereas Patel and Pavitt’s (Econ Innov New Technol 3:77–95, 1994a) work has been modestly cited, its postulation of two archetypes for national innovation systems, i.e. dynamic and myopic national innovation systems, has hardly been used to advance insight in firm behaviour; in this chapter we explore this dichotomy and build a novel research instrument for characterising this behaviour with regard to technological activities (although we equate their original terminology with innovation). An exploration of the underlying postulations, background and domain assumptions leads to the development of elements for the instrument. At the same time, it demonstrates that firm behaviour has limitedly been discussed in the context of national innovation systems. Therefore, suggestions for research, including the use of research methods, build on the deliberations on this chapter. Furthermore, the thoughts on how to use the research instrument informed by systems theories indicate the multiple levels of analysis: decision making on and monitoring of innovation processes in firms and innovation networks, sectoral innovation systems, regional innovation systems and national innovation systems. In addition, decision making on and monitoring of innovation processes in firms and innovation networks is related in this chapter to two models derived from systems theories: the model for the dynamic adaptation capability and the model for management of innovation and organisational structures. Particularly, we advocate that data for using the research instruments to position firm behaviour in the continuum of dynamic and myopic national innovation systems can be aggregated to compare firms across sectoral, regional and national innovation systems; this will lead to answering the question whether firms’ perspectives on innovation are an expression of its individual approach to innovation management or whether they share traits related to managing innovation with other firms in an industrial sector, regional innovation system or national innovation system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achterbergh, J., & Vriens, D. (2009). Organizations: Social systems conducting experiments. Springer.
Agnihotri, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). CEO narcissism and myopic management. Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.006
Aken, J. E. V. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x
Alderman, J., Forsyth, J., Griffy-Brown, C., & Walton, R. C. (2022). The benefits of hiring a STEM CEO: Decision making under innovation and real options. Technology in Society, 71, 102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102064
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 241–271.
Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1997). Technological globalisation or national systems of innovation? Futures, 29(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(96)00072-9
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. Wiley.
Auernhammer, J. (2020). Design research in innovation management: A pragmatic and human-centered approach. R&D Management, 50(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12409
Babelytė-Labanauskė, K., & Nedzinskas, Š. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research organizations’ R&D and innovation performance. Journal of Modelling in Management, 12(4), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-05-2015-0025
Balzat, M., & Hanusch, H. (2004). Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0187-y
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
Baskaran, A., & Muchie, M. (2008). Towards a unified conception of innovation systems. Paper presented at the 6th Globelics Conference, Mexcio City.
Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm: The managerial cybernetics of organization. John Wiley & Sons.
Bennett, D., & Dekkers, R. (2009). Industrial networks of the future: Review of research and practice. In R. Dekkers (Ed.), Dispersed manufacturing networks: Challenges for research and practice (pp. 13–34). Springer.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
Breznik, L., & Hisrich, D. R. (2014). Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: Are they related? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2014-0018
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374
Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., & Rehman, S. S. (2016). Mode 3 knowledge production: Systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0045-9
Çelikyurt, U., & Dönmez, B. N. (2017). Engineer CEOs and firm performance in BIST manufacturing firms. SSRN, 14, 2943710.
Colapinto, C., & Porlezza, C. (2012). Innovation in creative industries: From the quadruple helix model to the systems theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0051-x
Daellenbach, U. S., McCarthy, A. M., & Schoenecker, T. S. (1999). Commitment to innovation: The impact of top management team characteristics. R&D Management, 29(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00130
Dekkers, R. (2017). Applied systems theory (2nd edn.). Springer.
Dekkers, R., & Hicks, C. (2019). How many cases do you need for studies into operations management? Guidance based on saturation. Paper presented at the 26th EurOMA Conference, Helsinki.
Dekkers, R., Barlow, A., Chaudhuri, A., & Saranga, H. (2020). Theory informing decision-making on outsourcing: A review of four ‘five-year’ snapshots spanning 47 years. Adam Smith Business School. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3691983
Dekkers, R., Carey, L., & Langhorne, P. (2022). Making literature reviews work: A multidisciplinary guide to systematic approaches. Springer.
Dekkers, R. (2005). (R)Evolution, organizations and the dynamics of the environment. Springer.
Dekkers, R. (2009). Endogenous innovation in China: The case of the printer industry. Asia Pacific Business Review, 15(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380802396466
Dekkers, R., Koukou, M. I., Mitchell, S., & Sinclair, S. (2019). Engaging with open innovation: A Scottish perspective on its opportunities, challenges and risks. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 28(1), 193–226. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.028.0187
Dekkers, R., Whittam, G., Talbot, S., & Thomson, J. C. (2014). Does Schumpeter still rule? Reflections on the current epoch. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 13(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.013.0007
Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400303
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Elsahn, Z., Callagher, L., Husted, K., Korber, S., & Siedlok, F. (2020). Are rigor and transparency enough? Review and future directions for case studies in technology and innovation management. R&D Management, 50(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12412
Eom, B.-Y., & Lee, K. (2010). Determinants of industry–academy linkages and their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Research Policy, 39(5), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.015
Fallon-Byrne, L., & Harney, B. (2017). Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities for innovation: A review and research agenda. Irish Journal of Management, 36(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijm-2017-0004
Feldman, M. P., & Ronzio, C. R. (2001). Closing the innovative loop: Moving from the laboratory to the shop floor in biotechnology manufacturing. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620010005484
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., & Sharma, Z. (2011). Incentives and innovation: Evidence from CEO compensation contracts (0025–1747). Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper/B. o. Finland.
Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–348). Pinter.
Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309
Fukuda, K., & Watanabe, C. (2008). Japanese and US perspectives on the national innovation ecosystem. Technology in Society, 30(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.10.008
Gouldner, A. W. (1971). The coming crisis of western sociology. Heinemann.
Groenveld, P. (2007). Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Research-Technology Management, 50(6), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1997.11671157
Hayes, R. H., & Abernathy, W. J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 67–77.
Hewitt-Dundas, N., Gkypali, A., & Roper, S. (2019). Does learning from prior collaboration help firms to overcome the ‘two-worlds’ paradox in university-business collaboration? Research Policy, 48(5), 1310–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.016
Hidalgo, A., & Albors, J. (2008). Innovation management techniques and tools: A review from theory and practice. R&D Management, 38(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00503.x
Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P.-A., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation systems in less successful developing countries: The case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1445–1457.
Jaruzelski, B., Dehoff, K., & Bordia, R. (2006). Smart spenders: The global innovation 1000. Strategy+Business.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3%3c193::AID-SMJ949%3e3.0.CO;2-C
Kidd, P. S., & Parshall, M. B. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118453
Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 37–50.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121.
Kybernetes’ Editorial Team. (2000). Ten pints of Beer: The rationale of Stafford Beer’s cybernetic books (1959–1994). Kybernetes, 29(5/6), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920010333044
Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998). The inter-organizational Dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.285
Lavoie, M., & Finnie, R. (1998). The early careers of engineers and the accumulation of skills in the Canadian economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000028
Lawrence, P. (1980). Managers and management in West Germany. Routlegde.
Le Dain, M.-A., Calvi, R., & Cheriti, S. (2010). Developing an approach for design-or-buy-design decision-making. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2010.03.010
Lee, C., Park, G., Marhold, K., & Kang, J. (2017). Top management team’s innovation-related characteristics and the firm’s explorative R&D: An analysis based on patent data. Scientometrics, 111(2), 639–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2322-1
Lekkerkerk, L. J. (2012). Innovatie-en organisatiestructuur; Ontwikkeling en test van een functiemodel voor structuuronderzoek en-diagnose. (Doctoral Thesis), Radboud University, Nijmegen. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2066/93601
Levesque, M., Phan, P., Raymar, S., & Waisman, M. (2014). Are CEOs Myopic? A dynamic model of the ongoing debate corporate governance in the US and global settings (Vol. 17, pp. 125–151). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/23.5.279
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/25.3.195
Lundvall, B. -Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user producer interaction to national systems of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 349–369). Pinter.
Marxt, C., & Brunner, C. (2013). Analyzing and improving the national innovation system of highly developed countries: The case of Switzerland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1035–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.008
Motohashi, K. (2008). Growing R&D collaboration of Japanese firms and policy implications for reforming the national innovation system. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380802116773
Mueller, D. C., & Yun, S. L. (1998). Rates of return over the firm’s lifecycle. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/7.2.347
Neely, A., Filippini, R., Forza, C., Vinelli, A., & Hii, J. (2001). A framework for analysing business performance, firm innovation and related contextual factors: Perceptions of managers and policy makers in two European regions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060110384307
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1987). Is Western Europe losing the technological race? Research Policy, 16(2), 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90024-2
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994a). National innovation systems: Why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599400000004
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994b). Uneven (and divergent) technological accumulation among advanced countries: Evidence and a framework of explanation *. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 759–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.3.759
Patrinos, H. A., & Lavoie, M. (1995). Engineers and economic development in Greece. International Journal of Manpower, 16(10), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729510102648
Pavitt, K., & Patel, P. (1988). The international distribution and determinants of technological activities. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4(4), 35–55.
Peng, C.-W. (2017). CEO tenure, managerial myopia, and innovation efficiency. International Research Journal of Applied Finance, 8(12), 742–761.
Petersen, J. K., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3–4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(3&4), 137–168.
Popper, K. R. (1966). Logik der Forschung. Mohr.
Radice, H. (1998). ‘Globalization’ and national differences. Competition and Change, 3(3), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/102452949800300301
Ragin, C. C. (1999). Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal complexity. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1225–1239.
Reale, F. (2019). Governing innovation systems: A Parsonian social systems perspective. Technology in Society, 59, 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101174
Reinert, H., & Reinert, E. S. (2006). Creative destruction in economics: Nietzsche, sombart, schumpeter. In J. G. Backhaus & W. Drechsler (Eds.), Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900): Economy and society (pp. 55–85). Springer.
Sampson, R. C. (2005). Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1009–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.483
Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9–20.
Schenkenhofer, J. (2022). Hidden champions: A review of the literature and future research avenues. Management Review Quarterly, 72(2), 417–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00253-6
Schlaile, M. P., Urmetzer, S., Blok, V., Andersen, A. D., Timmermans, J., Mueller, M., et al. (2017). Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustainability, 9(12), 2253.
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Schumpeter, J. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. von Duncker & Humblot.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Selz, O. (1913). Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs, erster Teil. Spemann.
Senge, P. M. (1992). The fifth discipline. Century Business.
Simon, H. (1990). “Hidden champions”: Speerspitze der deutschen Wirtschaft. Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaft, 60(9), 875–890.
Simon, H. (1996). You don’t have to be German to be a “Hidden Champion.” Business Strategy Review, 7(2), 1–13.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/146324400363536
Stevens, G. A., & Burley, J. (1997). 3000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success! Research-Technology Management, 40(3), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1997.11671126
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3c509::AID-SMJ882%3e3.0.CO;2-Z
Tidd, J. (1995). Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1240307
Tidd, J., & Brocklehurst, M. (1999). Routes to technological learning and development: An assessment of Malaysia’s innovation policy and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 62(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00047-5
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., & Venkataraman, G., S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford University Press.
van Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12096
Venohr, B., & Meyer, K. E. (2007). The German miracle keeps running: How Germany’s hidden champions stay ahead in the global economy (Vol. 30). Working Papers.
Wagner, M., & Kreuter, A. (1998). Erfolgsfaktoren innovativer Unternehmen. io Management Zeitschrift Industrielle Organisation, 67(10), 34–41.
Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8), 1407–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.004
Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency and quality. The Free Press.
Witt, A. (2015). Internationalisation of Hidden Champions and other global niche strategy variants. A comparison between German and British world market leading companies. (Doctoral Thesis), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Woodside, A. G. (2016). Bad to good: Achieving high quality and impact in your research. Emerald Group Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dekkers, R., Lekkerkerk, L.J., Su, P. (2024). Toward a Research Instrument for Firm Behaviour in the Dichotomy Dynamic Versus Myopic National Innovation Systems: Reflections from a Systems Perspective. In: Dekkers, R., Morel, L. (eds) European Perspectives on Innovation Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41796-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41796-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41795-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41796-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)