Skip to main content

The Municipal Regime in Argentina

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local Governance in Multi-Layered Systems

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 108))

  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

In the article, the various government orders of the Argentine federation and the bases of municipal autonomy in the National Constitution are first developed. Subsequently, the bases of the municipal regime are considered in the Provincial Constitutions and after, the different types of existing local governments. The Municipal Organic Charters are also analyzed, as an expression of local autonomy. And finally, the violations of said autonomies are described, with special reference to the financial and tax aspects, within the framework of the centralization that the country suffers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Hernández (2019a).

  2. 2.

    See Hernández (1997a); Hernández (2009) especially Chapters III, IV, and V, where further analysis can be found; Hernández (2017), which contains a more up-to-date analysis; and Hernández (2019b). In English, see Hernández (2018, 2019c, d).

  3. 3.

    In which I served as Vice-President of the Drafting Committee.

  4. 4.

    According to Art. 124 of the National Constitution, each Region is created and integrated into the respective Province. Only the Province of Buenos Aires and the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires do not constitute a Region, which might be very important for solving the problems of the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires, with more than 13,000,000 of inhabitants. See Hernández (2019b).

  5. 5.

    The population is approximately 44 million people and Argentina is the eighth largest countries of the world.

  6. 6.

    As there is no room to analyse this important point concerning the historical evolution of this debate, please refer to the books quoted supra, note 3.

  7. 7.

    Art. 75 Section 2 establishes that laws and tax sharing agreements must be agreed between the President and the Governors, with subsequent approval by the Congress and the Legislatures. This must be the most important expression of concerted federalism and the basis of federal finances. Unfortunately, 25 years after the 1994 constitutional reform, it has not been possible to fulfill this mandate. See Hernández (2020), pp. 125 ff.

  8. 8.

    CSJN, ‘Intendente Municipal Capital c. Provincia de La Rioja s. Amparo’, 11 November 2014, where I represented the Municipality plaintiff before the Supreme Court of Justice, See Cuaderno de Federalismo, 2014 Annual Federalism Report, Institute of Federalism of the National Academy of Law and Social Sciences of Córdoba, Córdoba, 2015, on www.acaderc.org.ar. This ruling, together with those mentioned above, are the most important of the jurisprudence of our Highest Federal Court around the municipal autonomy.

  9. 9.

    See Hernández and Krivocapich (2021a). In the case of the Municipality of La Banda, I was also the lawyer who represented the plaintiff and in this last case, we presented an Amicus Curiae before the Supreme Court of Justice on behalf of more than 40 Municipalities of the Province of Buenos Aires.

  10. 10.

    See Hernández (2019a, c) and, regarding our constitutional culture, Hernández et al. (2016).

  11. 11.

    There are approximately 2300 local governments in the 23 Provinces. In general, only cities or municipalities of the first category can issue their own Municipal Organic Charts, according to the Provincial Constitutions. See Hernández (2003), p. 140.

  12. 12.

    The first degree is the federal level, the second degree is the provincial level, and the third degree is the municipal level.

  13. 13.

    For a further analysis of these issues, see Hernández (2003).

  14. 14.

    Considered the father of the historic National Constitution of 1853.

  15. 15.

    The author had the honor to chair the Municipal Constitutional Convention of the City of Córdoba, which in 1995 enacted the first Municipal Charter for a city of more than one million inhabitants in Latin America. The charter was the result of a very high degree of consensus by the five blocks of political parties in the Convention delegates. This Charter has served as a model for many others in Argentina.

  16. 16.

    The Province of Buenos Aires is the most centralized one and has the most backward municipal system of all. There is no political decentralization, since for approximately 17,000,000 inhabitants in 307,000 km2 there are only 135 municipal governments based in a city, while the other localities have delegates appointed by the Mayor. In some cases, that delegate is more than 100 km2 from the capital city. There is a movement promoting the autonomy of these localities, which recently met in Huanguelén. See the interview in the newspaper La Nueva of Bahia Blanca, June 2, 2018, where I pointed out the need for an immediate constitutional reform in the Province to guarantee municipal autonomy and decentralize provincial power. In addition, see Hernández (2003), the chapter on Régimen Municipal Argentino.

  17. 17.

    See Hernández (2005). The subject is regulated in Municipal Organic Law No. 8102 of the Province of Córdoba, enacted in 1991 on the basis of my draft bill in the Provincial Legislature. I was also a member of the Drafting Committee in the Provincial Constituent Assembly of the Province of Córdoba, which in 1987 enshrined the principle of municipal autonomy in Arts. 180, 183 and concordants of the Provincial Constititution.

  18. 18.

    There are 47 cities with a population of more than 10,000 inhabitants that are required to adopt an Organic Charter, but only 27 cities have done so.

  19. 19.

    See Hernández (2019b), p. 20 ‘Proposals for the strengthening of Federalism’.

  20. 20.

    The author represented the plaintiff (the Municipality) in this other case of historical importance regarding local autonomy. Besides this, it cannot be ignored that there is a need for greater consistency in the standards of control of constitutionality of the Courts and the Court in relation to local autonomy, particularly in relation to the advances observed in the powers of taxation and municipal police power, despite the provisions of Art. 75, section 30 of the Supreme Law. In this regard, see the decision in the case Cet v. Municipalidad de Río Cuarto- Acción. Declarativa de inconstitucionalidad, in 2014, where the Superior Court of Justice of the Province of Córdoba upheld the action brought by the provincial gaming concessionaire against an Ordinance of the Deliberating Council that had tried to limit the 24-hour operation of the Casino, in exercise of the health police power, and in view of the problems caused by gambling addiction. Notwithstanding the extraordinary appeals and complaints filed, in addition to the request for a public hearing, the Supreme Court finally dismissed the matter in 2017, although the opposing vote of Justice Rosatti should be noted.

  21. 21.

    See Hernández and Krivocapich (2021b).

  22. 22.

    Llach and Grotz (2013).

  23. 23.

    Whose detail can be seen in Hernández (2009), chapter III.

  24. 24.

    What was invalidated by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, in the ruling of 24 November 2015 that gave rise to the claims presented by the Provinces of San Luis, Santa Fe and Córdoba, for the detractions made to the coparticipable mass, without the participation and agreement of the Provinces.

  25. 25.

    OECD Statistical Database, www.oecd.org.

  26. 26.

    See the argumentation of José Raúl Heredia in his cited work, in the point ‘Autonomy versus tax centralization’, 181 ff (Heredia 2005).

  27. 27.

    Proposal No. 1, in Hernández (2019b).

References

  • Abalos MG (2003) El régimen municipal argentino, después de la reforma nacional de 1994. Cuestiones Constitucionales, 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Heredia JR (2005) El poder tributario de los municipios, in the point ‘Autonomy versus tax centralization’. Rubinzal Culzoni Editores, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (1997a) Federalismo, autonomía municipal y la Ciudad de Buenos Aires en la reforma constitucional de 1994. Depalma, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (1997b) Derecho Municipal, 2nd edn. Depalma, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2003) Derecho Municipal. National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2005) El régimen municipal cordobés. Revista de Derecho Público, 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2009) Federalismo y Constitucionalismo Provincial, 2nd edn. Abeledo Perrot, Buenos Aires, 912 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2017) La Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires y el fortalecimiento del federalismo argentino. Jusbaires, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2018) Constitutional law in Argentina, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2019a) A veinticinco años de la Reforma Constitucional de 1994’ – Legitimidad, ideas fuerza, diseño constitucional, modernización e incumplimiento. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2019b) Estudios de federalismo comparado. Argentina, Estados Unidos y Mexico. UNAM y Rubinal Culzoni Editores, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2019c) Subnational constitutional law in Argentina, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2019d) Studies in comparative federalism. Argentina, The United States and Mexico. E-Book, Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM (2020) El federalismo argentino. Continuación. Aspectos fiscales y económicos. In: Hernández AM, Barrera Buteler G (eds) Derecho Público Provincial. Abeledo Perrot, Buenos Aires, pp 125–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM, Krivocapich G (2021a) “Municipal Autonomy in its tax aspect”-Commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court in “Esso v. Municipality of Quilmes”. La Ley, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM, Krivocapich G (2021b) Autonomía municipal en su aspecto tributario. La Ley, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández AM et al (2016) Segunda Encuesta de Cultura Constitucional. Argentina: una sociedad anómica. Eudeba, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Llach JJ, Grotz M (2013) Federales y unitarios en el siglo XXI. Temas, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Losa N (1995) Derecho Municipal en la Constitución vigente. Abaco, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchiaro EJ (2000) Derecho Municipal. Nuevas Relaciones Intermunicipales. Ediar, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosatti H (1997) Tratado de Derecho Municipal, 2nd edn. Rubinzal Culzoni, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuccherino RM (1992) Zuccherino, Tratado de Derecho Federal, Estadual y Municipal (Argentino y Comparado), 2nd edn. Depalma, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hernández, A.M. (2023). The Municipal Regime in Argentina. In: Nicolini, M., Valdesalici, A. (eds) Local Governance in Multi-Layered Systems. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 108. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41792-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41792-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41791-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41792-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics