Abstract
Remote laboratories can be an essential support for teaching and learning. They offer possibilities that otherwise cannot be implemented in the classroom. The project OnLabEdu (Online Laboratories for School Education) focuses on developing remote labs for school, including the development of appropriate accompanying teaching and learning materials. This paper presents the first design of a learning arrangement for a characteristic curve remote lab. The learning arrangement was designed based on the model of educational reconstruction and therefore, takes the clarification of the scientific content and students’ perspectives into account. The topic is RGB LEDs and the connection of the terms energy, forward voltage, and wavelength of light. Following a design-based research approach, the learning arrangement was evaluated through two probing acceptance interviews with two high school students. The main goal was to identify first hints on learning obstacles, along with elements that support learning within the learning arrangement together with the handling of the remote lab itself. The results showed barriers to conceptual understanding of energy and forward voltage and that students had problems writing down their ideas in appropriate technical language. Furthermore, the students noted room for improvement concerning the interface of the remote lab. Based on these findings, ideas for re-designing the learning arrangement are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schlichting, L.C.M., et al.: Remote laboratory: application and usability. In: 2016 XII Congreso de Tecnologia, Aprendizaje y Ensenanza de la Electronica (XII Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching Conference) (TAEE) 22.06.2016–24.06.2016, pp. 1–7. IEEE, Seville, Spain (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAEE.2016.7528355
Pester, A., Klinger, T.: Distributed experiments and distributed learning. Int. J. Onl. Eng. 16(6), 19–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i06.13661
Barab, S., Squire, K.: Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J. Learn. Sci. 13(1), 1–14 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., Hopf, M.: Design-based research as a model for systematic curriculum development: the example of a curriculum for introductory optics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16(2), 020152 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020152
Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., Parchmann, I.: The model of educational reconstruction – a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In: Jorde, D., Dillon, J. (eds.) Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrospective and Prospective, pp. 13–27. Sense Publ., Rotterdam (2012). https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2848.6720
Duit, R.: The constructivist view in science education–what it has to offer and what should not be expected from it. Investigaçôes em ensino de ciências 1(1), 40–75 (1996)
Feynman R.P., Leighton R.B., Sands M.L.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume II: Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter. Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, CA (2011)
Jaeger, R.C., Blalock, T.N., Blalock, B.J.: Microelectronic Circuit Design, 6th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2023)
Liu, X., Ebenezer, J., Fraser, D.M.: Structural characteristics of university engineering students’ conceptions of energy. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 39(5), 423–441 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10030
Schecker, H., Duit, R.: Schülervorstellungen zu Energie und Wärmekraftmaschinen. In: Schecker, H., Wilhelm, T., Hopf, M., Duit, R. (eds.) Schülervorstellungen und Physikunterricht, pp. 163–183. Springer Spektrum, Berlin (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57270-2_8
Saputro, D.E., Sarwanto, S., Sukarmin, S., Ratnasari, D.: Students’ conceptions analysis on several electricity concepts. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1013, 12043 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012043
Wilhelm, T., Hopf, M.: Schülervorstellungen zum elektrischen stromkreis. In: Schecker, H., Wilhelm, T., Hopf, M., Duit, R. (eds.) Schülervorstellungen und Physikunterricht, pp. 115–138. Springer Spektrum, Berlin (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57270-2_6
Wiener, G.J., Schmeling, S.M., Hopf, M.: The technique of probing acceptance as a teacher’s professional development tool: a PCK study. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 55(6), 849–875 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21442
Jung, W.: Probing acceptance, a technique for investigation learning difficulties. In: Duit, R., Goldberg, F., Niedderer, H. (eds.) Research in Physics Learning - Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the University of Bremen, pp. 278–295. IPN, Kiel (1992)
Kuckartz, U.: Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and using Software. Sage, Newcastle upon Tyne (2013)
Acknowledgements
This project is funded by the Innovation Foundation for Education and is carried out as part of the Innovation Labs for Education program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krumphals, I., Steinmetz, T.B., Kreiter, C., Klinger, T. (2023). The Development of a Learning Arrangement in a Characteristic Curve Remote Laboratory. In: Guralnick, D., Auer, M.E., Poce, A. (eds) Creative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education. TLIC 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 767. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41636-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41637-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)