Skip to main content

PEM4PPM: A Cognitive Perspective on the Process of Process Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management (BPM 2023)

Abstract

During the last decades, process mining (PM) has matured and rapidly increased in its adoption. Making sense of data is a main part of the work of PM analysts, which involves cognitive processes. Recent work has leveraged behavioral data to explain these processes. Still, the process of process mining (PPM) is yet to be well understood and a theoretical foundation for explaining how these processes unfold is missing. This paper attempts to fill this gap by understanding how PPM data can be analyzed in a theory-guided manner and what insights can be gained from this analysis. To investigate these aspects, we analyzed verbal data and interaction traces obtained from analysis sessions with 29 participants performing a PM task. The analysis was based on the Predictive Processing (PP) theory and the derived Prediction Error Minimization (PEM) process, anchored in cognitive science. The results include (1) a theoretical adaptation of the PEM theory to the PPM context, (2) four strategies utilized by PM analysts, identified, and validated based on the adapted theory, and (3) an understanding of the differences in performance between analysts using different strategies and independence of the expertise level and the strategy choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Zoom https://zoom.us/

  2. 2.

    The full study design, including participants’ recruitment procedure, was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval no. 238/21).

  3. 3.

    Fluxicon Disco https://fluxicon.com/disco/

  4. 4.

    Vocalmatic https://vocalmatic.com/

  5. 5.

    MAXQDA https://www.maxqda.com/

References

  1. R’bigui, H., Cho, C.: The state-of-the-art of business process mining challenges. Int. J. Bus. Process Integr. Manage. 8(4), 285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPIM.2017.10009731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tiwari, A., Turner, C.J., Majeed, B.: A review of business process mining: state-of-the-art and future trends. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 14, 5–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810849373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. vom Brocke, J., Jans, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: A five-level framework for research on process mining. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(5), 483–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00718-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sweller, J.: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 12, 257–285 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jans, M., Soffer, P., Jouck, T.: Building a valuable event log for process mining: an experimental exploration of a guided process. Enterpr. Inf. Syst. 13, 601–630 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2019.1587788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zerbato, F., Soffer, P., Weber, B.: Initial insights into exploratory process mining practices. In: Polyvyanyy, A., Wynn, M.T., Van Looy, A., Reichert, M. (eds.) Business Process Management Forum. LNBIP, vol. 427, pp. 145–161. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85440-9_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Zerbato, F., Soffer, P., Weber, B.: Process mining practices: evidence from interviews. In: Di Ciccio, C., Dijkman, R., del Río, A., Ortega, S.R.-M. (eds.) Business Process Management, pp. 268–285. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16103-2_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Zerbato, F., Koorn, J.J., Beerepoot, I., Weber, B., Reijers, H.A.: On the origin of questions in process mining projects. In: João, P.A., Almeida, D.K., Guizzardi, G., Montali, M., Maggi, F.M., Fonseca, C.M. (eds.) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing, pp. 165–181. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17604-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kubrak, K., Milani, F., Nolte, A.: Process mining for process improvement - an evaluation of analysis practices. In: Guizzardi, R., Ralyté, J., Franch, X. (eds.) Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 214–230. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann, L., Zerbato, F., Weber, B.: Process mining challenges perceived by analysts: an interview study. In: Augusto, A., Gill, A., Bork, D., Nurcan, S., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, pp. 3–17. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07475-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hohwy, J.: The self-evidencing brain. Noûs 50, 259–285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, A.: Busting Out: Predictive Brains, Embodied Minds, and the Puzzle of the Evidentiary Veil. Noûs 51, 727–753 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Bruin, L., Michael, J.: Prediction error minimization: implications for embodied cognition and the extended mind hypothesis. Brain Cogn. 112, 58–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H.: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 37(1), 21–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Bruin, L., Michael, J.: Prediction error minimization as a framework for social cognition research. Erkenntnis 86(1), 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0090-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams, D.: Predictive processing and the representation wars. Mind. Mach. 28(1), 141–172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9441-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Leoni, M., Mannhardt, F.: Road traffic fine management process. Eindhoven University of Technology. Dataset (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mannhardt, F.: Multi-perspective process mining. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Denzin, N.K., Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Contemp. Sociol. 14, 125 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/2070501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17, 2–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Giannakos, M.N., Sharma, K., Pappas, I.O., Kostakos, V., Velloso, E.: Multimodal data as a means to understand the learning experience. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 48, 108–119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saldaña, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Recker, J., Safrudin, N., Rosemann, M.: How novices design business processes. Inf. Syst. 37, 557–573 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2011.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Westbrook, L.: Mental models: a theoretical overview and preliminary study. J. Inf. Sci. 32, 563–579 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506068134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Staggers, N., Norcio, A.F.: Mental models: concepts for human-computer interaction research. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38, 587–605 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (1998).https://doi.org/10.1604/9780803959392

  28. Nachar, N.: The Mann-Whitney U: a test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 4(1), 13–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mendenhall, W., Beaver, B.M., Beaver, R.J.: Mendenhall’s brief introduction to probability and statistics. Brooks/Cole (2001). https://doi.org/10.1604/9780534396091

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Baron, J.: Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge University Press (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840265

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Wallace, A.F.C.: Plans and the structure of Behavior. Am. Anthropol. 62(6), 1065–1067 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1960.62.6.02a00190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Polya, G.: How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (2004)..https://doi.org/10.1604/9780691119663

  33. Dehaene, S., Lau, H., Kouider, S.: What Is Consciousness, and could machines have it? In: von Braun, J., S. Archer, M., Reichberg, G.M., Sánchez Sorondo, M. (eds.) Robotics, AI, and Humanity, pp. 43–56. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54173-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Acknowledgment. This work was partially funded by the Israel Science Foundation under grant agreement 2005/21 and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under Grant No.: 200021 197032.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizaveta Sorokina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sorokina, E., Soffer, P., Hadar, I., Leron, U., Zerbato, F., Weber, B. (2023). PEM4PPM: A Cognitive Perspective on the Process of Process Mining. In: Di Francescomarino, C., Burattin, A., Janiesch, C., Sadiq, S. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41619-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41620-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics