Abstract
During the last decades, process mining (PM) has matured and rapidly increased in its adoption. Making sense of data is a main part of the work of PM analysts, which involves cognitive processes. Recent work has leveraged behavioral data to explain these processes. Still, the process of process mining (PPM) is yet to be well understood and a theoretical foundation for explaining how these processes unfold is missing. This paper attempts to fill this gap by understanding how PPM data can be analyzed in a theory-guided manner and what insights can be gained from this analysis. To investigate these aspects, we analyzed verbal data and interaction traces obtained from analysis sessions with 29 participants performing a PM task. The analysis was based on the Predictive Processing (PP) theory and the derived Prediction Error Minimization (PEM) process, anchored in cognitive science. The results include (1) a theoretical adaptation of the PEM theory to the PPM context, (2) four strategies utilized by PM analysts, identified, and validated based on the adapted theory, and (3) an understanding of the differences in performance between analysts using different strategies and independence of the expertise level and the strategy choice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Zoom https://zoom.us/
- 2.
The full study design, including participants’ recruitment procedure, was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval no. 238/21).
- 3.
Fluxicon Disco https://fluxicon.com/disco/
- 4.
Vocalmatic https://vocalmatic.com/
- 5.
MAXQDA https://www.maxqda.com/
References
R’bigui, H., Cho, C.: The state-of-the-art of business process mining challenges. Int. J. Bus. Process Integr. Manage. 8(4), 285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPIM.2017.10009731
Tiwari, A., Turner, C.J., Majeed, B.: A review of business process mining: state-of-the-art and future trends. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 14, 5–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810849373
vom Brocke, J., Jans, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: A five-level framework for research on process mining. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(5), 483–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00718-8
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 12, 257–285 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Jans, M., Soffer, P., Jouck, T.: Building a valuable event log for process mining: an experimental exploration of a guided process. Enterpr. Inf. Syst. 13, 601–630 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2019.1587788
Zerbato, F., Soffer, P., Weber, B.: Initial insights into exploratory process mining practices. In: Polyvyanyy, A., Wynn, M.T., Van Looy, A., Reichert, M. (eds.) Business Process Management Forum. LNBIP, vol. 427, pp. 145–161. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85440-9_9
Zerbato, F., Soffer, P., Weber, B.: Process mining practices: evidence from interviews. In: Di Ciccio, C., Dijkman, R., del Río, A., Ortega, S.R.-M. (eds.) Business Process Management, pp. 268–285. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16103-2_19
Zerbato, F., Koorn, J.J., Beerepoot, I., Weber, B., Reijers, H.A.: On the origin of questions in process mining projects. In: João, P.A., Almeida, D.K., Guizzardi, G., Montali, M., Maggi, F.M., Fonseca, C.M. (eds.) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing, pp. 165–181. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17604-3_10
Kubrak, K., Milani, F., Nolte, A.: Process mining for process improvement - an evaluation of analysis practices. In: Guizzardi, R., Ralyté, J., Franch, X. (eds.) Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 214–230. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_13
Zimmermann, L., Zerbato, F., Weber, B.: Process mining challenges perceived by analysts: an interview study. In: Augusto, A., Gill, A., Bork, D., Nurcan, S., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, pp. 3–17. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07475-2_1
Hohwy, J.: The self-evidencing brain. Noûs 50, 259–285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12062
Clark, A.: Busting Out: Predictive Brains, Embodied Minds, and the Puzzle of the Evidentiary Veil. Noûs 51, 727–753 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12140
de Bruin, L., Michael, J.: Prediction error minimization: implications for embodied cognition and the extended mind hypothesis. Brain Cogn. 112, 58–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.01.009
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H.: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 37(1), 21–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
de Bruin, L., Michael, J.: Prediction error minimization as a framework for social cognition research. Erkenntnis 86(1), 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0090-9
Williams, D.: Predictive processing and the representation wars. Mind. Mach. 28(1), 141–172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9441-6
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis (2019)
de Leoni, M., Mannhardt, F.: Road traffic fine management process. Eindhoven University of Technology. Dataset (2015)
Mannhardt, F.: Multi-perspective process mining. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2018)
Denzin, N.K., Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Contemp. Sociol. 14, 125 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/2070501
Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17, 2–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
Giannakos, M.N., Sharma, K., Pappas, I.O., Kostakos, V., Velloso, E.: Multimodal data as a means to understand the learning experience. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 48, 108–119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.003
Saldaña, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage (2021)
Recker, J., Safrudin, N., Rosemann, M.: How novices design business processes. Inf. Syst. 37, 557–573 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2011.07.001
Westbrook, L.: Mental models: a theoretical overview and preliminary study. J. Inf. Sci. 32, 563–579 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506068134
Staggers, N., Norcio, A.F.: Mental models: concepts for human-computer interaction research. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38, 587–605 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1028
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (1998).https://doi.org/10.1604/9780803959392
Nachar, N.: The Mann-Whitney U: a test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 4(1), 13–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p013
Mendenhall, W., Beaver, B.M., Beaver, R.J.: Mendenhall’s brief introduction to probability and statistics. Brooks/Cole (2001). https://doi.org/10.1604/9780534396091
Baron, J.: Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge University Press (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840265
Wallace, A.F.C.: Plans and the structure of Behavior. Am. Anthropol. 62(6), 1065–1067 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1960.62.6.02a00190
Polya, G.: How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (2004)..https://doi.org/10.1604/9780691119663
Dehaene, S., Lau, H., Kouider, S.: What Is Consciousness, and could machines have it? In: von Braun, J., S. Archer, M., Reichberg, G.M., Sánchez Sorondo, M. (eds.) Robotics, AI, and Humanity, pp. 43–56. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54173-6_4
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment. This work was partially funded by the Israel Science Foundation under grant agreement 2005/21 and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under Grant No.: 200021 197032.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sorokina, E., Soffer, P., Hadar, I., Leron, U., Zerbato, F., Weber, B. (2023). PEM4PPM: A Cognitive Perspective on the Process of Process Mining. In: Di Francescomarino, C., Burattin, A., Janiesch, C., Sadiq, S. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41619-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41620-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)