Abstract
Digital government often addresses how, where, and by whom digital transformation is brought into the complex institutional framed practices of governments and governance of society. However, digital transformation also points at critical demands to address the basic underlying institutional design of governments. The ongoing digital transformation of public welfare institutions opens for a gradual redesign of public institutions. It is important to address core values, such as inclusion, diversity, and literacy, to ensure a reflected transformation and re-design of public institutions. The purpose of this paper is to show how new forms of digital public services may have to be matched with institutional re-design to sustain public values and legitimate governments. We build on Ostrom’s eight design principles for institutional governance of common-pool resources and propose four principles for analyzing potential needs for re-design of institutions. Through a re-analysis of two case studies on automation in Swedish public organizations, we illustrate and discuss the institutional design. Hereby, we identify critical points for further analysis of emerging demands for institutional re-design. The analysis indicates that we must see beyond the organizational changes of digital government reforms and programs. We need to stretch into the institutional and foundational models of the public sector and how to provide equal and resilient welfare in a digital and changing world. We conclude by suggesting an agenda for research on institutional re-design in the digital era.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson, C., Hallin, A., Ivory, C.: Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: configuring work during automation in local government. Gov. Inf. Quart. 39(1), 101662, 1–10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
Bannister, F.: Beyond the box: reflections on the need for more blue sky thinking in research. Gov. Inf. Q. 40(101831), 1–11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101831
Bauman, Z.: Liquid Modernity. Polity Press, Malden (2000)
Beck, U., Lau, C.: Second modernity as a research agenda: theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘meta-change’ of modern society. Br. J. Sociol. 56(4), 525–557 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00082.x
Benner, M.: The Scandinavian challenge: the future of advanced welfare states in the knowledge economy. Acta Sociologica. 46(2), 132–149 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699303046002004
Bernhard, I., Gustafsson, M., Hedström, K., Seyferin, J., Whilborg, E.: A digital society for all? - Meanings, practices and policies for digital diversity. In: 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3067–3076 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.371
Bijker, W.E.: Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. MIT press, Cambridge (1997)
Collington, R.: Disrupting the welfare state? Digitalisation and the retrenchment of public sector capacity. New Polit. Econ. 27(2), 312–328 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1952559
Esping-Andersen, G.: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1990)
Geels, F.W.: Micro-foundations of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: Developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics and neo-institutional theory. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 152, 119894 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119894
Gil-Garcia, J.R., Dawes, S.S., Pardo, T.A.: Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads. Public Manage. Rev. 20(5), 633–646 (2018). https://doi-org.e.bibl.liu.se/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
Goodin, R.E. (ed.): The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge University IPress, Cambridge (1998)
Larsson, K.K.: Digitization or equality: when government automation covers some, but not all citizens. Gov. Inf. Quart. 38(1), 101547, 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101547
Lindgren, I., Åkesson, M., Thomsen, M., Toll, D.: Organizing for robotic process automation in local government: observations from two case studies of robotic process automation implementation in Swedish municipalities. In: Juell-Skielse, G., Lindgren, I., Åkesson, M. (eds.) Service Automation in the Public Sector: Concepts, Empirical Examples and Challenges, pp. 189–203. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92644-1_10
Lindgren, I.: Exploring the use of robotic process automation in local government. EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2020, 249–258 (2020)
Lindgren, I., Johansson, B., Söderström, F., Toll, D.: Why is it difficult to implement robotic process automation? Empirical cases from Swedish municipalities. In: Janssen, et al. (eds.) EGOV 2022. LNCS vol. 13391, pp.353–368. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_23
Madsen, C.Ø., Lindgren, I., Melin, U.: The accidental caseworker – how digital self-service influences citizens' administrative burden. Govern. Inf. Quart. 39(1), 101653, 1–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101653
Nelson, R.R.: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Harvard (1985)
Norris, P.: Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001). https://doi.org/10.1108/146366903322008287
North, D.C.: Toward a theory of institutional change. Political Econ. Inst. Compet. Represent. 31(4), 61–69 (1993)
Nyhlén, S., Gidlund, K.L.: In conversation with digitalization: myths, fiction or professional imagining? Inf. Polity. 27(3), 331–341 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200287
Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Ostrom, E.: Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., Cordella, A.: Public value creation in digital government. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(4), 101421 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421
Pollitt, C.: New Perspectives on Public Services: Place and Technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Popper, K.: The Open Society and its Enemies. Routledge, London (1945)
Room, G.: Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy: Agile Decision-Making in a Turbulent World. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2011)
Rothstein, B.O., Teorell, J.A.: What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21(2), 165–190 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
Scott, W.R.: Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)
Svallfors, S. (ed.): Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2012). https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804782524.001.0001
Toll, D.: Sociotechnical imaginaries of the automated municipality. Licentiate dissertation, Linköping University Electronic Press (2022)
Toll, D., Lindgren, I., Melin, U.: Stakeholder views of process automation as an enabler of prioritized value ideals in a Swedish municipality. JeDEM 14(2), 32–56 (2022). https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i2.726
Toonen, T.: Resilience in public administration: The work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom from a public administration perspective. Public Admin. Rev. 70(2), 193–202 (2010). https://doi-org.e.bibl.liu.se/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02147.x
Wihlborg, E., Larsson, H., Hedström, K.: “The Computer Says No!” – a case study on automated decision-making in public authorities. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2093–2912. IEEE Computer Society (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.364
Woolgar, S., Neyland, D.: Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584741.001.0001
Zürn, M.: A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819974.001.0001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wihlborg, E., Lindgren, I., Hedström, K., Gidlund, K. (2023). Institutional Re-design for a Digital Era - Learning from Cases of Automation. In: Edelmann, N., Danneels, L., Novak, AS., Panagiotopoulos, P., Susha, I. (eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41616-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41617-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)