Abstract
In the past few decades, NGOs have become a vital part of the organisational landscape, and accountability is an essential aspect of their work. The concept of accountability refers to the obligation of an organisation to account for its actions, decisions, and performance to its stakeholders. NGOs are accountable to two main stakeholders—donors and beneficiaries—in what is called upward and downward accountability, respectively. Various environmental and institutional pressures have altered and designed the face of NGOs’ answer to accountability as a coping strategy; thus far, this dimension is undeveloped in the literature. Therefore, the current study examined the accountability dimensions system within NGOs in Ghana. Expanding on the new institutional sociology theory, predominantly the normative forces, including the media and the other identified bodies, the study assumed an in-depth interpretive case study approach in Ghana using a single community-based organisation. Interviews and documentary reviews were used to attain data. A total of 35 interviews were conducted with various groups, both outside and within the case organisation. The study findings are analysed and interpreted from the view of institutional theory, predominantly the new institutional sociology. It was found that in examined NGOs, the dominant accountability systems are upward towards donors. Moreover, downward accountability is not given significant prominence by NGOs in Ghana, mostly due to absence of donor’s commitment. From the study, it is evident that NGOs accountability systems are shaped by institutional pressures. The result has consequences on understanding the reporting and operational systems of NGOs, principally, in developing countries such as Ghana. It is said that NGOs can deliberately and vigorously respond to these institutional pressures for legitimacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, Z., Hopper, T., & Wickramsinghe, D. (2011). Counter hegemony and accountability in BRAC-a Bangladesh NGO [online]. Accessed from http://hdl.handle.net/10292/5006
Antlöv, H., Ibrahim, R., & van Tuijl, P. (2006). NGO governance and accountability in Indonesia: Challenges in a newly democratizing country. In NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations (pp. 147–163). Earthscan.
Awio, G., Northcott, D., & Lawrence, S. (2011). Social capital and accountability in grass-roots NGOs: The case of the Ugandan community-led HIV/AIDS initiative. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(1), 63–92.
Banks, N., & Hulme, D. (2012). The role of NGOs and civil society in development and poverty reduction. In Brooks world poverty institute working paper 171. University of Manchester.
Baur, D., & Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Institute of Business Ethics, 9(21), 9.
Brass, J. N. (2012). Why do NGOs go where they go? Evidence from Kenya. World Development, 40(2), 387–401.
Chenhall, R. H., Hall, M., & Smith, D. (2010). Social capital and management control system: A study of non-governmental organisation. Accounting, Organisation and Society, 35, 737–756.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). University of Chicago Press.
Ebrahim, A. (2003a). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191–212.
Ebrahim, A. (2003b). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87.
Ebrahim, A. (2009). Placing the normative logics of accountability in “thick” perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(6), 885–904.
Faizan, R., Haque, A. U., Cockrill, A., & Aston, J. (2019). Females at strategic level affecting logistics firms’ competitiveness: Qualitative comparative analysis. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(1), 57–71.
Fowler, A. (Ed.). (2013). Striking a balance: A guide to enhancing the effectiveness of non-governmental organisations in international development. Routledge.
Fox, J., & Brown, L. (1998). The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and grassroots movements. MIT Press.
Goddard, A., & Assad, M. J. (2006). Accounting and navigating legitimacy in Tanzanian NGOs. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(3), 377–404.
Gray, R. (2013). Back to basics: What do we mean by environmental (and social) accounting and what is it for?—A reaction to Thornton. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 24(6), 459–468.
Gray, R., Brennan, A., & Malpas, J. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38(4), 258–273.
Haque, A. U., & Yamoah, F. A. (2021). The role of ethical leadership in managing occupational stress to promote innovative work behaviour: A cross-cultural management perspective. Sustainability, 13, 9608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179608
Hasmath, R., & Hsu, J. Y. J. (2013). Isomorphic pressures, epistemic communities and state-NGO collaboration in China. The China Quarterly, 220(December 2014), 936–954.
Hayfron-Benjamin, M. (2013). An exploration of the roles of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in the promotion of women’s rights: The case of Abantu for development in Ghana. PhD thesis, University of Education, Winneba.
Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (Eds.). (2013). Making a difference: NGO’s and development in a changing world. Routledge.
Jordan, L. (2005). Mechanisms for NGO accountability. GPPi Research Paper Series, 3.
Kaldor, M. (2013). New and old wars: Organised violence in a global era (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Kendall, J., & Knapp, M. (1995). A loose and baggy monster: Boundaries, definitions and typologies: An introduction to the voluntary sector. Routledge.
Mercer, C., & Green, M. (2013). Making civil society work: Contracting, cosmopolitanism and community development in Tanzania. Geoforum, 45, 106–115.
Meyer, J. W. (2007). Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage.
Myers, T. A. (2013). Accountability and Transparency in the Financial Services Sector: Advancing Sustainable Finance. Journal of International Business Ethics, 6(1/2), 72.
O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study of Amnesty Ireland. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 801–824.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th ed.). Sage.
Smillie, I., Helmich, H., Randel, J., & German, T. (Eds.). (2013). Stakeholders: Government-NGO partnerships for international development. Routledge.
Yamoah, F. A., & Haque, A. U. (2022). Strategic management through digital platforms for remote working in the higher education industry during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL10_NO2_6
Yin R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Awuah-Werekoh, K., Yamoah, F.A., Faizan, R. (2023). Accountability Systems of Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs): Case Study from Ghana. In: Yamoah, F.A., Haque, A.u. (eds) Corporate Management Ecosystem in Emerging Economies . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41578-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41578-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41577-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41578-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)