Abstract
Through the collaborative practice of British socialist-feminist photographer Jo Spence (1934–1992) and the contents of her memorial archive, this chapter explores what is at stake when political, future-oriented work is institutionalized. It begins by analysing how art-market and museum economies mute Spence’s polemic and the ways in which archival theory and practice must be recast to amplify it as a basic tenet of archival stewardship. The chapter then elucidates the pressures on Spence’s collaborative work as it became entangled with the individualistic mechanisms of capitalism, art markets and copyright law. After examining the archive’s conceptualization of photography as inherently collaborative, and its commitment to operating in ways consonant with the political aims of the work, the chapter traces the tensions over ownership of the phototherapy work Spence made with Rosy Martin. Focusing on the mutuality of their collaboration beyond posing and operating the camera, the chapter proposes we conceptualise it through the co-counselling principles used in their phototherapy, and the organizational principles of Libreria delle Donne in Milan, Italy (1975–), rather than notions of artistic attribution. Doing so illuminates the importance of archivists and historians in keeping the dynamics of past collaborative practices alive for the present and the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A correlation with what Walter Benjamin conceptualized as ‘use’ or ‘cult value’ in his famous 1936 ‘Work of Art’ essay (Akker 2016) is evident here: several Spence and Dennett’s original agit-prop panel exhibitions that perhaps, in Dennett’s view, possessed an ‘aura’ of authenticity were sold to the Museu d’Art Contemporani de Barcelona and the Museo Nacional Centro de Reina Sofia in Spain. Representation of the Jo Spence Estate was also signed over to the London-based commercial gallerist Richard Saltoun who sells components of the archive as fine art—both ‘vintage’ pieces and Dennett-approved limited-edition reprints from original negatives. In addition to The Image Centre’s holdings, significant amounts of photographs, documents and reference material from the Jo Spence Memorial Archive can be found in collections at the History and Theory of Photography Research Centre, Birkbeck, University of London; Bishopsgate Institute, London; and the Tate Britain’s archives.
- 2.
Spence was also a member of the Hackney Flashers’ collective and Siona Wilson briefly discusses their panel exhibition Women and Work (retitled at one point as Women at Work) and its appearance in numerous configurations, including in Spence’s autobiography Putting Myself in the Picture. She foregrounds the Hackney Flashers treatment of photographs as reproducible units of information, not fixed compositional elements. She emphasizes this as a direct reference to the proletariat amateurism of the interwar period and the use of the wall newspaper in factories and other contexts as a “temporary makeshift collage[s] of information and imagery that served as a leftist alternative to the mainstream press” (Wilson, 158–159).
- 3.
http://www.shin-gallery.com/Exhibition/?ex_cd=35&view_fg=P&site_gb=1 (accessed June 2021).
- 4.
In addition to Spence, the Shin Gallery maintains a stock of work by many artists and photographers. All the available Jo Spence work listed on their website excludes her collaborators: Dennett is not credited for Remodelling Photo History (The History Lesson) 1982, or A Picture of Health: Helmet Shot 1982, and Martin is not credited for Phototherapy (Infantilization-Mind/Body), 1984.
- 5.
The relevant links are: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/spence-libido-uprising-part-i-and-part-ii-p80411; https://www.richardsaltoun.com/artists/36-jo-spence/works/17422-jo-spence-libido-uprising-1989/; http://www.britishphotography.org/artists/19153/12335/jo-spence-photo-therapy-libido-uprising-part-1?r=artists/19153/jo-spence (accessed June 2021).
- 6.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents (accessed June 2021); see also Sanig 2002. Thanks to Alexandra Symons-Sutcliffe for help with the legal research for this.
References
Akker, Chiel van den. 2016. Benjamin, the Image and the End of History. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology 3 (1): 43–54.
Azoulay, Ariella Aïsha. 2008. Civil Imagination: A Political Ontology of Photography, 2015. London: Verso.
Brothman, Brien. 1999. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria 48: 64–88.
Cook, Terry. 2011. The Archive(s) Is a Foreign Country: Historians, Archivists, and the Changing Archival Landscape. American Archivist 74 (2): 600–635.
Dennett, Terry. 1979. England: The (Workers’) Film & Photo League. In Photography/Politics: One, ed. Terry Dennett and Jo Spence, 100–117. London: Photography Workshop.
Dennet, Terry. n.d. Undated. Letter to Pat. Photocopied booklet in JSMLA, London.
———. 2012. Letter to Patrizia Di Bello. Re: Donation from Terry Dennett Jo Spence Memorial Archive to History and Theory of Photography Research Centre. Manuscript in the JSMLA at Birkbeck, University of London.
Dennett, Terry, and Jo Spence. 1979. A Statement from Photography Workshop. Photography/Politics: One. Ed. by Terry Dennett and Jo Spence. London: Photography Workshop: II.
Di Bello, Patrizia. 2018. Sculptural Photographs from the Calotype to Digital Technologies. London: Bloomsbury.
Freeman, Elizabeth. 2010. Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham: Duke University Press.
Heath, Charlene. 2020. L’image militante et son institutionnalisation. Transbordeur photographie: histoire société. Vol. 4, 104–113. Paris and Genève: Association Transbordeur & Éditions Macula.
———. 2017. In Search of Red: Remodelling the Jo Spence Memorial Archive. Photography and Culture 10 (3): 289–298.
Kee, Joan. 2019. Models of Integrity: Art and Law in Post-Sixties America. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Ketelaar, Eric. 2001. Tacit Narratives: The Meanings of Archives. Archival Science 1: 131–141.
Martin, Rosy. 2023. Conversation with the author. London.
Martin, Rosy, and Jo Spence. 1985. New Portraits for Old: The Use of the Camera in Therapy. Feminist Review. Spring: 66–92.
Ribalta, Jorge, Duncan Forbes, Sarah James, and Siona Wilson. 2015. The Reception of Worker Photography and the New Documentary Culture in Britain. Not Yet: On the Reinvention of Documentary and the Critique of Modernism. Essays and Documents [1972-1991], 63–67. Madrid: Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía.
Roberts, David Richard. 2 May 1994. Probate Letter. Untitled jpeg in Terry Dennett’s digital archive, JSMLA.
Roe, Alex Martinis. 2018. To Become Two: Propositions for Feminist Collective Practice. Berlin: Archive Books.
Sanig, Karen. 2002. In Protection of Copyright in Art under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Dear Images: Art: Copyright and Culture, ed. Daniel McClean and Karsten Schubert, 47–56. London: Ridinghouse, ICA.
Spence, Jo. 1986a. Putting Myself in the Picture: A Political, Personal and Photographic Autobiography. London: Camden Press.
———. 1986b. Review of Children’s Books. Spare Rib:48
———. 1986c. In The Sign as a Site of Class Struggle: Reflections on Works by John Heartfield. Photography/Politics: Two, ed. Patricia Holland, Jo Spence, and Simon Watney, 176–186. London: Comedia/Photography Workshop.
———. 1992a. Condition Letter. Reproduced in X Marks the Spot. Not Our Class #3, 2012. London: Lambeth Women’s Project: Unpaginated.
———. 1992b. Jo Spence to Rosy Martin. Jpeg ‘jo rosy letter’ from folder ‘jo death high res scans’ in Terry Dennett’s digital archive at JSMLA.
Spence, Jo, and Rosy Martin. 1988. Photo-Therapy: Psychic Realism as a healing Art? Jo Spence and Rosy Martin describe the background to their work in Photo-Therapy. Ten.8. Autumn:2–17.
Spence, Jo, and Terry Dennett. n.d. Why Your Camerawork is Late. Photocopied Typescripts in JSMLA.
Unknown. 2017. Jo Spence. New Yorker 4: 10.
Wilson, Siona. 2015. Revolting Photographs: Proletarian Amateurism in Jo Spence and Terry Dennett’s Photography Workshop. In Art Labor, Sex Politics: Feminist Effects in 1970s British Art and Performance, 139–199. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heath, C., Di Bello, P. (2024). The Work Which Is Not One. In: Bertrand, M., Chambefort-Kay, K. (eds) Contemporary Photography as Collaboration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41444-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41444-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41443-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41444-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)