Abstract
South African government operates under the cooperative governance model which seeks to bring all spheres of government together to promote people’s government. Public participation was introduced at the local government to improve efficiency, transparency, and public involvement in decision-making processes. However, the rise in public service delivery protests and unrest in South Africa demonstrates that the current community engagement mechanisms’ systematic design is failing to achieve inclusion in municipal decision-making processes despite an understanding of what public participation is and what is supposed to achieve. This chapter explored the opportunities and shortcomings of current invited and invented spaces of participation in local government and how social innovation and appreciative inquiry to inclusiveness in decision-making processes. Methodologically, virtual ethnography, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data which was analysed using thematic analysis. The study discovered the issues that led communities to utilise the invented spaces of participation instead of the formal invited spaces of participation made available by the government.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Biljohn, M. (2017). Social innovation, an alternative approach to South African local government service delivery? African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(7), 53–63.
Biljohn, M. I. (2019). Developing the Participatory Capacity of South African Citizens in Municipal Service Delivery through Social Innovation. Politeia, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6689/3546
Botha, Y. (2021). Extending polyphonic strategic communication to stakeholder engagement: Exploring deliberate-emergent and radical-emergent approaches. Management Dynamics, 30(2).
Conrwall, A. (2002). Introduction: New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalised participation. DS bulletin 35.2 new democratic spaces? Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.UK/media/57a08ccc40f0b652dd00157e/cornwall.pdf (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Cornwall, A., & Coelho. (2007). Spaces for change? The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. Journal Article. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289986868_Spaces_for_change_The_politics_of_participation_in_new_democratic_arenas (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264.
Dacombe, R., & Parvin, P. (2021). Participatory democracy in an age of inequality. Journal of Representative Democracy, 57(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1933151
du Plooy, F., Davic, C., & Bezuidenhout, R. (2014). Research matters. Juta.
Fashoro, I & Barnard, L. (2018). Challenges to the successful implementation of social media in a South African municipality. Conference: the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists. https://doi.org/10.1145/3129416.3129426.
Freeman, R. E. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1186402 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1186402
Goodin, R. E. (2003). Reflective democracy. Oxford University Press.
Government Communication and Information Systems. (2014). Government communicators handbook, 2014-2017. Available at https://www.gcis.gov.za/government-communicators-handbook-2014-2017 (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Government Communication Policy. (2018). Department of Communication and Information Systems, Government Printers. Pretoria. Available from https://www.gcis.gov.za/sites/default/files/docs/Government%20Communication%20Policy%20Online%20Cabinet%20approved.pdf.
Kaur-Gill, S., & Dutta, M. J. (2017). Digital ethnography. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1-10).
Loux, J. (2011). Collaboration and stakeholder engagement. In R. Q. Grafton & K. Hussey (Eds.), Water resources planning and management. Cambridge University Press.
Mamokhere, J. (2019). An exploration of reasons behind service delivery protests in South Africa: A case of Bolobedu South at the Greater Tzaneen Municipality. International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA), 03 - 05 July 2019, Southern Sun Hotel, OR Tambo International Airport, Johannesburg, South Africa. Available at http://ulspace.ul.ac.za/handle/10386/2669.
Marais, D. L., Quayle, M., & Burns, J. K. (2017). The role of access to information in enabling transparency and public participation in governance: A case study of access to policy consultation records in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(6), 37–49. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC-754deef6f
Mathebula, N. E., Nkuna, N. W., & Sebola, M. P. (2016). Integrated development plan for improved service delivery: A comparative study of municipalities within the Mopani District Municipality, Limpopo Province. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 8(1), 70–85. Available at https://scholar.google.co.za/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=pGTA6vwAAAAJ&citation_for_view=pGTA6vwAAAAJ:A8cqit5AE6sC (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Matshe, E. M. S. (2009). The promotion of public participation in local government: The case of Ditsobotla Municipality, (Masters Dissertation). Potchefstroom, University of North-West.
Mirabftab, F., & Wills, S. (2005). Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2): 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282182. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237397575_Insurgency_and_Spaces_of_Active_Citizenship_The_Story_of_Western_Cape_Antieviction_Campaign_in_South_Africa (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Modise, L. J. (2017). The notion of participatory democracy in relation to local ward committees: The distribution of power. In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v51i1.2248
Motloutsi, E., & Oksiutycz, A. (2019). Stakeholder engagement practices in Greater Tzaneen municipality. MA thesis, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park Johannesburg, Gauteng South Africa.
Mufumadi, S. (2010). IPD Guide-Pack. Government Printers.
Mukwevho, M. H., & Nkuna, N. N. (2018). Are citizens reconfiguring public participation? A response to municipal re-demarcation by Vuwani Community, Vhembe District in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 53(2). Available at https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC-1328bcca47 (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Ngidi, N. D., Mtshixa, C., Diga, K., Mbarathi, N., & May, J. (2016). ‘Asijiki’and the capacity to aspire through social media: The# FeesMustFall movement as an anti-poverty activism in South Africa. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on information and communication technologies and development (pp. 1–11).
Nordberg, K., Marriussen, A., & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development: A case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. OSUVA Open Access. Available at https://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/11399 (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Piper, L., & Nadvi, L. (2010). Popular mobilization, party dominance and participatory governance in South Africa. Citizenship and Social Movements. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350219182.ch-009
Polman, N. B. P., Slee, B., Dijiskhoorn, M. W. C., Ninik, M., Gezik, V., & Soma, K. (2017). Classification of social innovations for marginalized rural areas. SIMRA. Available at http://www.simra-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/D2.1-Classification-of-SI-for-MRAs-in-the-target-region.pdf (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Porta, D. D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: Introduction. Social sciences. Willey.
Public Participation Framework for the South African Legislative Sector. (2013). Legislative Sector South Africa. Available at https://www.sals.gov.za/docs/pubs/ppf.pdf (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Quick, K. S., & Bryson, J. (2016). Theories of public participation in governance. In J. Torbing & C. Ansell (Eds.), Handbook of theories of governance chapter: Public participation (p. 12). Edward Elgar. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282733927_Theories_of_public_participation_in_governance (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Rowlinson, S., & Cheung, Y. K. (2008). Stakeholder management through empowerment: Modelling project success. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802071182
Sebola, M. (2016). Public participation in South Africa’s policy decision-making process: The mass and the elite choices. International Public Administration Review, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2016.1.03. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2760289
Shabangu, P. E., & Oksiutycz, A. (2018). Stakeholders’ perception of the local government stakeholder engagement practices in the Bekkersdal township. Journal of Public Administration, 53(2), 199–214.
Tesoriero, F. (2010). Community development: Community-based alternatives in an age of globalisation. Pearson.
The Presidency. (2016). Republic of South Africa: President Zuma takes the Siyahlola Monitoring Programme to Kwaggafontein in Mpumalanga. Available at https://www.thepresidency.gov.za/content/president-zuma-takes-siyahlola-monitoring-programme-kwaggafontein-mpumalanga (Accessed on: 15 August 2022).
Turner, L. (2014). Penal Populism, Deliberative Methods, and the Production of “Public Opinion” on Crime and Punishment. The Good Society, 23(1), 87–102
Van Rooyen, E. J. (2003). A New Approach to Managing Community Participation and Stakeholder Negotiation in South African Local Government. SAJEMS NS, 6(1), 126–140
Wanyama, E. J., Dicko, B., & Toe, L. P. (2021). Good practices and lessons learned in developing local language tools to support stakeholder engagement activities. Research Square. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.21203%2Frs.3.rs-78190%2Fv1
Williams, P. (2019). The new district model will revolutionise service delivery. Government Communication and Information Systems. Available at https://www.gcis.gov.za/new-district-model-will-revolutionise-service-delivery (Accessed: 24 January 2022).
Williams, P. (2020). Phumla Williams: Fighting covid-19 – District by district, eye witness news, 20 June. Available at https://ewn.co.za/2020/06/09/phumla-williams-fighting-covid-19-district-by-district. Acesssed (28 September, 2023)
Winkler, T. (2011). Retracking Johannesburg: Spaces for participation and policy making. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11413603
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Zerfass, A. & Schneider. L. (2018). Polyphony in corporate and organizational communication: Exploring the roots and characteristics of a new paradigm. Communication Management Review, 3(2), 7–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Motloutsi, E., Motloutsi, A. (2024). Invited and Invented Spaces of Public Participation in South African Local Government: The Study of Community Engagement Practices and Service Delivery Protests. In: Mmutle, T., Molale, T.B., Akinola, O.O., Selebi, O. (eds) Strategic Communication Management for Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41401-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41401-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41400-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41401-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)