Skip to main content

Carl Schmitt and the Political Theology of Populism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines Carl Schmitt’s theory of democracy in light of Max Weber’s concept of charismatic rule. It is argued that Schmitt’s crypto-theological understanding of democracy, which assimilates political leadership into prophetic authority, implies an expressive or identitarian conception of democratic community. The latter is at odds with a genuinely democratic understanding of popular consent and liable to provide ideological cover for authoritarian corruptions of democracy. The chapter concludes with the suggestion that a political theology that resembles Schmitt’s forms the ideological basis of contemporary populist interpretations of the democratic ideal. It is therefore wrong to regard populism as only being directed against liberal democracy. Populist ideology and political practice, rather, are inimical to democracy per se.

This chapter incorporates some material from Vinx (2021a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, Hume (1994, p. 16): ‘Force is always on the side of the governed, the governors have nothing to support them but opinion. It is, therefore on opinion that government is founded; and this maxim extends to the most despotic and most military governments, as well as to the most free and most popular’.

  2. 2.

    When I speak of ‘legitimating effect’, I use the term in Weber’s descriptive sense: elections have legitimating effect if citizens, as a matter of social fact, regard the winner to be entitled to rule. Whether that indicates that the ruler’s claim is justified from a normative point of view is another matter, of course.

References

  • Bracher, K. D., Sauer, W., & Schulz, G. (1962). Die nationalsozialistische Machtergreifung. Studien zur Errichtung des totalitären Herrschaftssystems in Deutschland 1933/1934 (2nd ed.). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristi, R. (1998). Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism. University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demiralp, S., & Balta, E. (2021). Defeating Populists: The Case of the 2019 Istanbul Elections. South European Society and Politics, 26(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (2019). Ill Winds. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elklit, J., & Svensson, P. (1997). What Makes Elections Free and Fair? Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrekt, K. (2009). What Carl Schmitt Picked up in Weber’s Seminar: A Historical Controversy Revisited. The European Legacy, 14(6), 667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (2021). Backsliding. Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1994). Of the First Principles of Government. In K. Haakonssen (Ed.), Political Essays (pp. 16–19). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, O. (1995). Plebiszit und Diktatur: Die Volksabstimmungen der Nationalsozialisten. Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, A. (2008). Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary. Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H. (2006). Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. In M. Jestaedt & O. Lepsius (Eds.), Verteidigung der Demokratie (pp. 149–228). Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. G. (2020). Russia’s New Authoritarianism. Putin and the Politics of Order. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2016). What Is Populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M., O’Leary, B., & Wintrobe, R. (2020). Explaining the Paradox of Plebiscites. Government and Opposition, 55(2), 202–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, W. (2016). Carl Schmitt’s Defense of Democracy. In J. Meierhenrich & O. Simons (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt (pp. 312–337). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadurski, W. (2019). Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sajo, A. (2021). Ruling by Cheating. Governance in Illiberal Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2020). The End of Law. Carl Schmitt in the Twenty-First Century (2nd ed.). Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1927/2014). Volksentscheid und Volksbegehren. Ein Beitrag zur Auslegung der Weimarer Verfassung und zur Lehre von der unmittelbaren Demokratie. Duncker & Humblot. (Original work published 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1928/1993). Verfassungslehre. Duncker & Humblot. (Original work published 1928)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1932a/1998). Legalität und Legitimität. Duncker & Humblot. (Original work published 1932a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1932b/1963). Der Begriff des Politischen. Text von 1932b mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Duncker & Humblot. (Original work published 1932b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1933). Staat, Bewegung, Volk. Die Dreigliederung der politischen Einheit. Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2019). Me the People. How Populism Transforms Democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vinx, L. (2021a). Carl Schmitt and the Authoritarian Subversion of Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 47(2), 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinx, L. (2021b). Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Direct Democracy. History of Political Thought, 42(1), 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinx, L. (2015). Carl Schmitt’s Defence of Sovereignty. In D. Dyzenhaus & T. Poole (Eds.), Law, Liberty and State. Oakesshott, Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law (pp. 96–122). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (5th ed., J. Winckelmann, Ed.). Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, F. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Vinx .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vinx, L. (2023). Carl Schmitt and the Political Theology of Populism. In: Lagerspetz, E., Pulkkinen, O. (eds) Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41397-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics